T2-weighted Imaging Hyperintensity and Transcranial Motor-evoked Potentials During Cervical Spine Surgery: Effects of Sevoflurane in 150 Consecutive Cases.

IF 2.3 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-20 DOI:10.1097/ANA.0000000000000909
Nicole LeClair, Milca Ejimone, Davene Lynch, Jayanth Dasika, Dinesh Rao, Amie L Hoefnagel, Paul D Mongan
{"title":"T2-weighted Imaging Hyperintensity and Transcranial Motor-evoked Potentials During Cervical Spine Surgery: Effects of Sevoflurane in 150 Consecutive Cases.","authors":"Nicole LeClair, Milca Ejimone, Davene Lynch, Jayanth Dasika, Dinesh Rao, Amie L Hoefnagel, Paul D Mongan","doi":"10.1097/ANA.0000000000000909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is debate on the impact of inhalational esthetic agents on transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs) during intraoperative neuromonitoring. Current guidelines advise their avoidance, which contrasts with common clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study of 150 consecutive cervical spine surgeries at a single institution compared stimulation voltages and TcMEP amplitudes in patients who did and did not receive sevoflurane as part of a balanced anesthetic technique. Patients were divided into 3 groups stratified by the presence or absence of increased signal intensity within the cervical spinal cord on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (indicative or myelopathy/spinal cord injury [SCI]) and sevoflurane use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with no magnetic resonance imaging evidence of myelopathy/SCI that received sevoflurane (n=80) had the lowest stimulation voltages and largest TcMEP amplitude responses in the lower extremities compared with those with no magnetic resonance imaging evidence of myelopathy/SCI (n=30). In patients with evidence of myelopathy/SCI who did not receive sevoflurane (n=19), lower extremity TcMEP amplitudes were similar to patients with a myelopathy/SCI that received sevoflurane. Six of these 19 patients had initial low-dose sevoflurane discontinued because of concerns of low/absent baseline TcMEP amplitudes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Balanced anesthesia with 0.5 MAC sevoflurane in patients with and without radiological evidence of myelopathy/SCI allows reliable TcMEP monitoring. However, in communication with surgical and neuromonitoring teams, it may be advisable in a subset of patients to avoid or discontinue sevoflurane in favor of a propofol/opioid-based anesthetic to ensure adequate and reproducible TcMEPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"150-158"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0000000000000909","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is debate on the impact of inhalational esthetic agents on transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs) during intraoperative neuromonitoring. Current guidelines advise their avoidance, which contrasts with common clinical practice.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study of 150 consecutive cervical spine surgeries at a single institution compared stimulation voltages and TcMEP amplitudes in patients who did and did not receive sevoflurane as part of a balanced anesthetic technique. Patients were divided into 3 groups stratified by the presence or absence of increased signal intensity within the cervical spinal cord on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (indicative or myelopathy/spinal cord injury [SCI]) and sevoflurane use.

Results: Patients with no magnetic resonance imaging evidence of myelopathy/SCI that received sevoflurane (n=80) had the lowest stimulation voltages and largest TcMEP amplitude responses in the lower extremities compared with those with no magnetic resonance imaging evidence of myelopathy/SCI (n=30). In patients with evidence of myelopathy/SCI who did not receive sevoflurane (n=19), lower extremity TcMEP amplitudes were similar to patients with a myelopathy/SCI that received sevoflurane. Six of these 19 patients had initial low-dose sevoflurane discontinued because of concerns of low/absent baseline TcMEP amplitudes.

Conclusions: Balanced anesthesia with 0.5 MAC sevoflurane in patients with and without radiological evidence of myelopathy/SCI allows reliable TcMEP monitoring. However, in communication with surgical and neuromonitoring teams, it may be advisable in a subset of patients to avoid or discontinue sevoflurane in favor of a propofol/opioid-based anesthetic to ensure adequate and reproducible TcMEPs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颈椎手术中的 T2 加权成像高强度和经颅运动诱发电位:在 150 例连续病例中使用七氟醚的效果。
背景:关于术中神经监测时吸入麻醉剂对经颅运动诱发电位(TcMEPs)的影响存在争议。目前的指南建议避免使用此类药物,这与常见的临床实践形成了鲜明对比:这项回顾性队列研究对一家医疗机构的 150 例连续颈椎手术进行了研究,比较了作为平衡麻醉技术的一部分接受和未接受七氟醚的患者的刺激电压和 TcMEP 波幅。根据T2加权磁共振成像中颈椎脊髓内信号强度是否增高(提示或脊髓病/脊髓损伤 [SCI])和七氟烷的使用情况将患者分为三组:与没有磁共振成像证据显示脊髓病/脊髓损伤的患者(n=30)相比,接受七氟烷治疗的没有磁共振成像证据显示脊髓病/脊髓损伤的患者(n=80)下肢的刺激电压最低,TcMEP振幅反应最大。有脊髓病/脊髓损伤证据但未接受七氟烷治疗的患者(19 人)的下肢 TcMEP 振幅与接受七氟烷治疗的脊髓病/脊髓损伤患者相似。在这19名患者中,有6名患者因担心基线TcMEP振幅过低/消失而停止使用初始低剂量七氟烷:结论:在有或没有放射学证据表明患有脊髓病/脊髓损伤的患者中使用 0.5 MAC 七氟醚进行平衡麻醉可实现可靠的 TcMEP 监测。然而,在与手术团队和神经监测团队沟通后,可能会建议部分患者避免使用或停止使用七氟醚,转而使用丙泊酚/阿片类麻醉药,以确保TcMEP的充分性和可重复性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
10.80%
发文量
119
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology (JNA) is a peer-reviewed publication directed to an audience of neuroanesthesiologists, neurosurgeons, neurosurgical monitoring specialists, neurosurgical support staff, and Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit personnel. The journal publishes original peer-reviewed studies in the form of Clinical Investigations, Laboratory Investigations, Clinical Reports, Review Articles, Journal Club synopses of current literature from related journals, presentation of Points of View on controversial issues, Book Reviews, Correspondence, and Abstracts from affiliated neuroanesthesiology societies. JNA is the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care, the Neuroanaesthesia and Critical Care Society of Great Britain and Ireland, the Association de Neuro-Anesthésiologie Réanimation de langue Française, the Wissenschaftlicher Arbeitskreis Neuroanästhesie der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizen, the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutschsprachiger Neuroanästhesisten und Neuro-Intensivmediziner, the Korean Society of Neuroanesthesia, the Japanese Society of Neuroanesthesia and Critical Care, the Neuroanesthesiology Chapter of the Colegio Mexicano de Anesthesiología, the Indian Society of Neuroanesthesiology and Critical Care, and the Thai Society for Neuroanesthesia.
期刊最新文献
Safety and Efficacy of Neuroprotective Agents as Adjunctive Therapies for Reperfusion in the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Anesthesia for the Pregnant Patient Undergoing Intracranial Procedures. Epidemiology of Post-craniotomy Hypertension and Its Association With Adverse Outcome(s): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Effects of Scalp Nerve Block on Symptomatic Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome After Combined Revascularization Surgery for Moyamoya Disease. Comparison of Intubating Conditions Between Direct Laryngoscopy and C-MAC Video-laryngoscopy in Patients With Simulated Cervical Spine Immobilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1