The Ability of Doppler Uterine Artery Ultrasound to Predict Premature Birth.

Current Health Sciences Journal Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-30 DOI:10.12865/CHSJ.48.03.05
Ioana-Victoria Camen, Maria Magdalena Manolea, Sidonia Catalina Vrabie, Maria-Sidonia Sandulescu, Mircea-Sebastian Serbanescu, Mihail Virgil Boldeanu, Simona-Daniela Neamtu, Anca-Maria Istrate-Ofiteru, Anda Lorena Dijmarescu, Marius Bogdan Novac
{"title":"The Ability of Doppler Uterine Artery Ultrasound to Predict Premature Birth.","authors":"Ioana-Victoria Camen,&nbsp;Maria Magdalena Manolea,&nbsp;Sidonia Catalina Vrabie,&nbsp;Maria-Sidonia Sandulescu,&nbsp;Mircea-Sebastian Serbanescu,&nbsp;Mihail Virgil Boldeanu,&nbsp;Simona-Daniela Neamtu,&nbsp;Anca-Maria Istrate-Ofiteru,&nbsp;Anda Lorena Dijmarescu,&nbsp;Marius Bogdan Novac","doi":"10.12865/CHSJ.48.03.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Demonstration of the predictive capacity of Doppler Uterine Artery (UtA) on preterm birth (PB) by serial measurement at various ages of pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The prospective study included a group of 116 pregnant women, of whom 85 gave birth prematurely and 31 pregnant women gave birth at term, constituting the control group. UtA Doppler measurement was performed by the abdominal approach. Quantitative wave evaluations were performed by the pulsatility index (PI), the systole/diastole ratio (S/D), as well as the qualitative analysis of the flow rate waveform (notch). UtA Doppler evaluation was performed in 3 pregnancy periods: 18.0-22.6 weeks, 28.0-31.6 weeks, and 32.0-35.6 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only at the third examination, at 32.0-35.5 weeks of gestation, was there a statistically significant difference between the S/D-UtA ratio and PI-UtA correlated with the risk of premature birth (p<0.05). Although there was an association between UtA Doppler and late preterm birth, the predictive ability was low. Also, UtA Doppler was not statistically significant for preterm birth before 32 weeks of gestation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although we did not find a statistical association between second-trimester UtA Doppler and preterm birth, we do suggest a closer look at women with abnormal UtA Doppler in the second trimester. We believe that, according to the results obtained, UtA Doppler can predict especially iatrogenic premature birth depending on the prediction of the most severe complications, severe preeclampsia, and SGA.</p>","PeriodicalId":10938,"journal":{"name":"Current Health Sciences Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/05/1d/CHSJ-48-03-277.PMC9940921.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Health Sciences Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12865/CHSJ.48.03.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Demonstration of the predictive capacity of Doppler Uterine Artery (UtA) on preterm birth (PB) by serial measurement at various ages of pregnancy.

Methods: The prospective study included a group of 116 pregnant women, of whom 85 gave birth prematurely and 31 pregnant women gave birth at term, constituting the control group. UtA Doppler measurement was performed by the abdominal approach. Quantitative wave evaluations were performed by the pulsatility index (PI), the systole/diastole ratio (S/D), as well as the qualitative analysis of the flow rate waveform (notch). UtA Doppler evaluation was performed in 3 pregnancy periods: 18.0-22.6 weeks, 28.0-31.6 weeks, and 32.0-35.6 weeks.

Results: Only at the third examination, at 32.0-35.5 weeks of gestation, was there a statistically significant difference between the S/D-UtA ratio and PI-UtA correlated with the risk of premature birth (p<0.05). Although there was an association between UtA Doppler and late preterm birth, the predictive ability was low. Also, UtA Doppler was not statistically significant for preterm birth before 32 weeks of gestation.

Conclusions: Although we did not find a statistical association between second-trimester UtA Doppler and preterm birth, we do suggest a closer look at women with abnormal UtA Doppler in the second trimester. We believe that, according to the results obtained, UtA Doppler can predict especially iatrogenic premature birth depending on the prediction of the most severe complications, severe preeclampsia, and SGA.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
子宫动脉多普勒超声预测早产的能力。
目的:通过对不同孕龄的系列测量,验证子宫动脉多普勒(UtA)对早产(PB)的预测能力。方法:前瞻性研究包括116名孕妇,其中85名早产,31名足月分娩,构成对照组。通过腹部入路进行UtA多普勒测量。通过搏动指数(PI)、收缩/舒张比(S/D)以及流速波形(陷波)的定性分析进行定量波形评估。在3个妊娠期进行UtA多普勒评估:18.0-22.6周、28.0-31.6周和32.0-35.6周。结果:仅在妊娠32.0-35.5周第三次检查时,S/D-UtA比率和PI-UtA与早产风险之间是否存在统计学显著差异(结论:尽管我们没有发现妊娠中期UtA多普勒与早产之间的统计相关性,但我们确实建议仔细观察妊娠中期出现异常UtA多普勒的女性。我们相信,根据所获得的结果,UtA多普勒可以预测尤其是医源性早产,这取决于对最严重并发症的预测ampsia和SGA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
HOSPITAL WASTE MANAGEMENT AND TREATMENT IN HEALTHCARE SECTOR: A REVIEW HOUSEHOLD COPING STRATEGIES FOR DELIVERY CARE COSTS: FINDINGS FROM A RURAL DISTRICT OF PAKISTAN DIFFICULTY IN USABILITY OF ELECTRONIC PERSONAL HEALTH RECORD SYSTEMS FOR AN UNDERSERVED ELDERLY ADULT POPULATION A PROFILE OF DIABETIC RETINOPATY PATIENTS RECEIVING GREEN LASER FROM 2015 TO 2019 IN D.I.KHAN DIVISION, PAKISTAN RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN JOB EMBEDDEDNESS, ETHICAL CLIMATE WITH NURSES’ TURNOVER: THE MODERATING ROLE OF LOCUS OF CONTROL AND PERCEIVED EMPLOYMENT ALTERNATIVES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1