Diagnosis of urinary tract infection in infants under 3 months with fever without a source: reliability of urinalysis and urine culture.

Benigno M Méndez-Espinola, Emilio Gallardo-Aravena
{"title":"Diagnosis of urinary tract infection in infants under 3 months with fever without a source: reliability of urinalysis and urine culture.","authors":"Benigno M Méndez-Espinola, Emilio Gallardo-Aravena","doi":"10.24875/BMHIM.23000030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Urinary tract infection (UTI) is infants' most common serious bacterial infection. This study aimed to investigate the reliability of urianalysis (UA) to predict UTI, to specify the colony forming units (CFU)/ml threshold for diagnosis, and to identify variables that help suspect bacteremia in infants under 3 months with UTI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed clinical records of children under 3 months hospitalized for a fever without source and recorded age, sex, days of fever pre-consultation, temperature and severity at admission, discharge diagnoses, laboratory tests, and treatments. According to the discharge diagnosis, we divided them into UTIs (-) and (+) with or without bacteremia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 467 infants were admitted: 334 with UTI and 133 without UTI. In UTIs (+), the pyuria had a sensitivity of 95.8% and bacteria (+) 88.3%; specificity was high, especially for nitrites (96.2%) and bacteria (+) (92.5%). Positive predictive value (PPV) for nitrites was 95.9%, for bacteria 96.7%, and oyuria 92.5%. Escherichia coli was present in 83.8% of urine and 87% of blood cultures. UTIs with bacteremia had inflammatory urinalysis, urine culture > 100,000 CFU/ml, and higher percentage of C reactive protein (CRP) > 50 mg (p= 0.002); 94.6% of the urine culture had > 50,000 CFU.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The pyuria and bacteria (+) in urine obtained by catheterization predict UTI. The cut-off point for diagnosis was ≥ 50,000 CFU/ml. No variables to suspect bacteremia were identified in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":9103,"journal":{"name":"Boletín médico del Hospital Infantil de México","volume":"80 5","pages":"288-295"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boletín médico del Hospital Infantil de México","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/BMHIM.23000030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is infants' most common serious bacterial infection. This study aimed to investigate the reliability of urianalysis (UA) to predict UTI, to specify the colony forming units (CFU)/ml threshold for diagnosis, and to identify variables that help suspect bacteremia in infants under 3 months with UTI.

Methods: We reviewed clinical records of children under 3 months hospitalized for a fever without source and recorded age, sex, days of fever pre-consultation, temperature and severity at admission, discharge diagnoses, laboratory tests, and treatments. According to the discharge diagnosis, we divided them into UTIs (-) and (+) with or without bacteremia.

Results: A total of 467 infants were admitted: 334 with UTI and 133 without UTI. In UTIs (+), the pyuria had a sensitivity of 95.8% and bacteria (+) 88.3%; specificity was high, especially for nitrites (96.2%) and bacteria (+) (92.5%). Positive predictive value (PPV) for nitrites was 95.9%, for bacteria 96.7%, and oyuria 92.5%. Escherichia coli was present in 83.8% of urine and 87% of blood cultures. UTIs with bacteremia had inflammatory urinalysis, urine culture > 100,000 CFU/ml, and higher percentage of C reactive protein (CRP) > 50 mg (p= 0.002); 94.6% of the urine culture had > 50,000 CFU.

Conclusions: The pyuria and bacteria (+) in urine obtained by catheterization predict UTI. The cut-off point for diagnosis was ≥ 50,000 CFU/ml. No variables to suspect bacteremia were identified in this study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
3个月以下无源发热婴儿尿路感染的诊断:尿液分析和尿液培养的可靠性
背景:尿路感染(UTI)是婴幼儿最常见的严重细菌感染。本研究旨在探讨尿路分析(UA)预测UTI的可靠性,确定集落形成单位(CFU)/ml诊断阈值,并确定有助于怀疑3个月以下UTI婴儿菌血症的变量。方法:回顾3个月以下无源发热住院患儿的临床记录,记录入院时的年龄、性别、发热预诊天数、体温和严重程度、出院诊断、实验室检查和治疗情况。根据出院诊断,我们将其分为尿路感染(-型)和尿路感染(+型),伴有或不伴有菌血症。结果:共收治467例患儿,其中有尿路感染334例,无尿路感染133例。在uti(+)中,脓尿的敏感性为95.8%,细菌(+)的敏感性为88.3%;特异性高,亚硝酸盐(96.2%)和细菌(+)特异性高(92.5%)。亚硝酸盐阳性预测值(PPV)为95.9%,细菌阳性预测值为96.7%,尿阳性预测值为92.5%。83.8%的尿液和87%的血液培养物中存在大肠杆菌。合并菌血症的尿路感染伴炎性尿分析,尿培养>0万CFU/ml, C反应蛋白(CRP) bbb50 mg百分比较高(p= 0.002);94.6%的尿培养为50万CFU。结论:导尿中脓尿和细菌(+)可预测尿路感染。诊断临界值≥50,000 CFU/ml。本研究未发现可疑菌血症的变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Boletín Médico del Hospital Infantil de México is a bimonthly publication edited by the Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez. It receives unpublished manuscripts, in English or Spanish, relating to paediatrics in the following areas: biomedicine, clinical, public health, clinical epidemology, health education and clinical ethics. Articles can be original research articles, in-depth or systematic reviews, clinical cases, clinical-pathological cases, articles about public health, letters to the editor or editorials (by invitation).
期刊最新文献
Acknowledgments to reviewers 2023. Analysis of the changes in the management of preterm newborns born in a Spanish third-level hospital in the past 10 years. Changes in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit statistics during the COVID-19 pandemic. Comparison between the KARVI scale and the Child Development Evaluation test (EDI) as a screening tool for suspected neurodevelopmental delay. Dietary patterns of Sonoran breastfeeding women are associated to exclusive or partial breastfeeding regimes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1