Effectiveness of pancreatic stent placement in pediatric patients with acute recurrent and chronic pancreatitis.

Gerardo Blanco-Rodríguez, Mallerli N Ledezma-Cifuentes, Eustorgio S García-Cárdenas, Gerardo Blanco-Velasco, Mario Peña-García, Jaime Penchyna-Grub, Gustavo Teyssier-Morales, Jessie N Zurita Cruz
{"title":"Effectiveness of pancreatic stent placement in pediatric patients with acute recurrent and chronic pancreatitis.","authors":"Gerardo Blanco-Rodríguez, Mallerli N Ledezma-Cifuentes, Eustorgio S García-Cárdenas, Gerardo Blanco-Velasco, Mario Peña-García, Jaime Penchyna-Grub, Gustavo Teyssier-Morales, Jessie N Zurita Cruz","doi":"10.24875/BMHIM.23000044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of pancreatic prostheses in children with acute recurrent pancreatitis (ARP) and chronic pancreatitis (CP) has evolved. The main established indication is the treatment of persistent abdominal pain. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of pancreatic stenting for refractory abdominal pain in pediatric patients with ARP and CP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective case series study. We included patients under 16 years of age diagnosed with ARP and CP in the study. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was performed with the insertion of one and later two pancreatic stents. We evaluated abdominal symptoms before and after treatment, number of changes, duration of treatment, and complications with follow-up at 24 months and after withdrawal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine patients with ARP and CP were included in the study: six with undetermined etiology and three with pancreas divisum. The mean age was 12.4 years. Prosthesis placement relieved abdominal pain in 100% of cases, with 3.2 replacement sessions every 6.2 months for 27.4 months, and mild complications (15.7%). One patient experienced pain on removal of the prosthesis and required bypass surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pancreatic stent placement in patients with refractory abdominal pain with ARP and CP proved to be effective and safe, providing medium-term symptom relief and minimal complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":9103,"journal":{"name":"Boletín médico del Hospital Infantil de México","volume":"80 5","pages":"296-301"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boletín médico del Hospital Infantil de México","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/BMHIM.23000044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of pancreatic prostheses in children with acute recurrent pancreatitis (ARP) and chronic pancreatitis (CP) has evolved. The main established indication is the treatment of persistent abdominal pain. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of pancreatic stenting for refractory abdominal pain in pediatric patients with ARP and CP.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective case series study. We included patients under 16 years of age diagnosed with ARP and CP in the study. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was performed with the insertion of one and later two pancreatic stents. We evaluated abdominal symptoms before and after treatment, number of changes, duration of treatment, and complications with follow-up at 24 months and after withdrawal.

Results: Nine patients with ARP and CP were included in the study: six with undetermined etiology and three with pancreas divisum. The mean age was 12.4 years. Prosthesis placement relieved abdominal pain in 100% of cases, with 3.2 replacement sessions every 6.2 months for 27.4 months, and mild complications (15.7%). One patient experienced pain on removal of the prosthesis and required bypass surgery.

Conclusion: Pancreatic stent placement in patients with refractory abdominal pain with ARP and CP proved to be effective and safe, providing medium-term symptom relief and minimal complications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童急性复发性和慢性胰腺炎患者胰腺支架置入的有效性。
背景:胰腺假体在儿童急性复发性胰腺炎(ARP)和慢性胰腺炎(CP)中的应用已经发展。主要确定的适应症是治疗持续性腹痛。本研究旨在评估胰腺支架植入术治疗顽固性腹痛患儿的疗效。方法:我们进行了回顾性病例系列研究。我们纳入了16岁以下被诊断为ARP和CP的患者。内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)分别置入1个和2个胰腺支架。我们评估了治疗前后的腹部症状、变化次数、治疗持续时间和并发症,随访时间为24个月和停药后。结果:9例ARP合并CP患者纳入研究,其中6例病因不明,3例胰腺分裂。平均年龄为12.4岁。所有病例的腹痛均得到缓解,每6.2个月更换3.2次,持续27.4个月,并发症轻微(15.7%)。一名患者在移除假体时感到疼痛,需要进行搭桥手术。结论:胰腺支架置入术治疗伴有ARP和CP的难治性腹痛是有效和安全的,可以中期缓解症状,并发症最少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Boletín Médico del Hospital Infantil de México is a bimonthly publication edited by the Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez. It receives unpublished manuscripts, in English or Spanish, relating to paediatrics in the following areas: biomedicine, clinical, public health, clinical epidemology, health education and clinical ethics. Articles can be original research articles, in-depth or systematic reviews, clinical cases, clinical-pathological cases, articles about public health, letters to the editor or editorials (by invitation).
期刊最新文献
Acknowledgments to reviewers 2023. Analysis of the changes in the management of preterm newborns born in a Spanish third-level hospital in the past 10 years. Changes in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit statistics during the COVID-19 pandemic. Comparison between the KARVI scale and the Child Development Evaluation test (EDI) as a screening tool for suspected neurodevelopmental delay. Dietary patterns of Sonoran breastfeeding women are associated to exclusive or partial breastfeeding regimes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1