Measuring emotions in mathematics: the Achievement Emotions Questionnaire-Mathematics (AEQ-M).

IF 2 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Zdm-Mathematics Education Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-26 DOI:10.1007/s11858-022-01425-8
Maik Bieleke, Thomas Goetz, Takuya Yanagida, Elouise Botes, Anne C Frenzel, Reinhard Pekrun
{"title":"Measuring emotions in mathematics: the Achievement Emotions Questionnaire-Mathematics (AEQ-M).","authors":"Maik Bieleke, Thomas Goetz, Takuya Yanagida, Elouise Botes, Anne C Frenzel, Reinhard Pekrun","doi":"10.1007/s11858-022-01425-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding the structure, antecedents, and outcomes of students' emotions has become a topic of major interest in research on mathematics education. Much of this work is based on the Achievement Emotions Questionnaire-Mathematics (AEQ-M), a self-report instrument assessing students' mathematics-related emotions. The AEQ-M measures seven emotions (enjoyment, pride, anger, anxiety, shame, hopelessness, boredom) across class, learning, and test contexts (internal structure). Based on control-value theory, it is assumed that these emotions are evoked by control and value appraisals, and that they influence students' motivation, learning strategies, and performance (external relations). Despite the popularity and frequent use of the AEQ-M, the research leading to its development has never been published, creating uncertainty about the validity of the proposed internal structure and external relations. We close this gap in Study 1 (<i>N</i> = 781 students, Grades 5-10, mean age 14.1 years, 53.5% female) by demonstrating that emotions are organized across contexts and linked to their proposed antecedents and outcomes. Study 2 (<i>N</i> = 699 students, Grade 7 and 9, mean age 14.0 years, 56.9% female) addresses another deficit in research on the AEQ-M, the lack of evidence regarding the assumption that emotions represent sets of interrelated affective, cognitive, motivational, and physiological/expressive components. We close this gap by evaluating extended AEQ-M scales, systematically assessing these components for five core mathematics emotions (enjoyment, anger, anxiety, hopelessness, boredom). Our work provides solid grounds for future research using the AEQ-M to assess emotions and their components in the domain of mathematics.</p>","PeriodicalId":51441,"journal":{"name":"Zdm-Mathematics Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9607838/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zdm-Mathematics Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01425-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the structure, antecedents, and outcomes of students' emotions has become a topic of major interest in research on mathematics education. Much of this work is based on the Achievement Emotions Questionnaire-Mathematics (AEQ-M), a self-report instrument assessing students' mathematics-related emotions. The AEQ-M measures seven emotions (enjoyment, pride, anger, anxiety, shame, hopelessness, boredom) across class, learning, and test contexts (internal structure). Based on control-value theory, it is assumed that these emotions are evoked by control and value appraisals, and that they influence students' motivation, learning strategies, and performance (external relations). Despite the popularity and frequent use of the AEQ-M, the research leading to its development has never been published, creating uncertainty about the validity of the proposed internal structure and external relations. We close this gap in Study 1 (N = 781 students, Grades 5-10, mean age 14.1 years, 53.5% female) by demonstrating that emotions are organized across contexts and linked to their proposed antecedents and outcomes. Study 2 (N = 699 students, Grade 7 and 9, mean age 14.0 years, 56.9% female) addresses another deficit in research on the AEQ-M, the lack of evidence regarding the assumption that emotions represent sets of interrelated affective, cognitive, motivational, and physiological/expressive components. We close this gap by evaluating extended AEQ-M scales, systematically assessing these components for five core mathematics emotions (enjoyment, anger, anxiety, hopelessness, boredom). Our work provides solid grounds for future research using the AEQ-M to assess emotions and their components in the domain of mathematics.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
测量数学情绪:数学成就情绪问卷(AEQ-M)。
了解学生情绪的结构、前因和结果已成为数学教育研究的一个重要课题。这项工作大多基于数学成就情绪问卷(AEQ-M),这是一个评估学生数学相关情绪的自我报告工具。AEQ-M 可测量学生在课堂、学习和测试情境(内部结构)中的七种情绪(愉快、自豪、愤怒、焦虑、羞愧、绝望、无聊)。根据控制-价值理论,我们假设这些情绪是由控制和价值评价引起的,并影响学生的学习动机、学习策略和学习成绩(外部关系)。尽管 AEQ-M 很受欢迎,也经常被使用,但导致其发展的研究却从未发表过,这就给所提出的内部结构和外部关系的有效性带来了不确定性。我们在研究 1(781 名学生,5-10 年级,平均年龄 14.1 岁,53.5% 为女性)中弥补了这一空白,证明情绪在不同的情境中是有组织的,并与其提出的前因后果相关联。研究 2(N = 699 名学生,7 年级和 9 年级,平均年龄 14.0 岁,56.9% 为女性)解决了 AEQ-M 研究中的另一个不足,即缺乏证据证明情绪代表了一系列相互关联的情感、认知、动机和生理/表达成分。我们通过评估扩展的 AEQ-M 量表,系统地评估了五种核心数学情绪(愉快、愤怒、焦虑、绝望、无聊)的这些组成部分,从而弥补了这一不足。我们的工作为今后使用 AEQ-M 评估数学领域的情绪及其组成部分的研究提供了坚实的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Zdm-Mathematics Education
Zdm-Mathematics Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
124
期刊介绍: ZDM – Mathematics Education is one of the oldest mathematics education research journals. The papers appearing in the seven themed issues per year are strictly by invitation only followed by internal peer review by the guest-editors and external review by invited experts. The journal exists to survey, discuss and extend current research-based and theoretical perspectives as well as to create a forum for critical analyses of issues within mathematics education. The audience is pre-dominantly mathematics education researchers around the world interested in current developments in the field.
期刊最新文献
Teaching for statistical and data literacy in K-12 STEM education: a systematic review on teacher variables, teacher education, and impacts on classroom practice Acknowledgements to reviewers 2023 Mathematics and interdisciplinary STEM education: recent developments and future directions Technology maker practices in mathematics learning in STEM contexts: a case in Brazil and two cases in Canada Teacher growth in exploiting mathematics competencies through STEAM projects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1