A census of clinical trials conducted under the U.S. exception from informed consent rule.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Academic Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1111/acem.14645
Krista L Snyder, Jon F Merz
{"title":"A census of clinical trials conducted under the U.S. exception from informed consent rule.","authors":"Krista L Snyder,&nbsp;Jon F Merz","doi":"10.1111/acem.14645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The exception from informed consent (EFIC) rule was adopted in 1996, permitting waiver of informed consent for certain emergency research, including trials funded by the U.S. government. The rule requires prospective consent from patients or their legally authorized representative(s) (LAR) if practicable. For those enrolled without consent, the patient or their LAR must be given an opportunity to opt out from continued participation at the earliest opportunity. We sought to census the trials conducted under the EFIC rule to facilitate research to better understand how the rule is being used.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multipronged search to identify all trials conducted under the EFIC rule, drawing on reviews, database searches, examination of the FDA's docket, posting an inquiry on the institutional review board forum, and email requests to lead authors of all published EFIC trials and related review articles. We describe the trials, when they were started and completed, and whether they were terminated early.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified a total of 110 trials as of the end of April 2022: 78 complete, 13 recruiting, seven registered on clinicaltrials.gov but not yet recruiting, five trials that were abandoned before enrolling any subjects, and seven trials in early planning. Nine of the 78 completed trials were pilot or feasibility trials. Of 69 completed full trials, 30 (43.5%) were terminated early. The most common reason for early termination was futility (15 trials, 25.0%) followed by poor recruitment (10 trials, 14.5%). The rate of conduct of trials has been remarkably constant since 2001, with roughly 18 trials started in each 5-year period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We have compiled a census of trials conducted under the U.S. FDA's EFIC rule, the availability of which we hope will stimulate further in-depth data collection and analysis of this set of trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":"30 2","pages":"133-138"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.14645","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The exception from informed consent (EFIC) rule was adopted in 1996, permitting waiver of informed consent for certain emergency research, including trials funded by the U.S. government. The rule requires prospective consent from patients or their legally authorized representative(s) (LAR) if practicable. For those enrolled without consent, the patient or their LAR must be given an opportunity to opt out from continued participation at the earliest opportunity. We sought to census the trials conducted under the EFIC rule to facilitate research to better understand how the rule is being used.

Methods: We conducted a multipronged search to identify all trials conducted under the EFIC rule, drawing on reviews, database searches, examination of the FDA's docket, posting an inquiry on the institutional review board forum, and email requests to lead authors of all published EFIC trials and related review articles. We describe the trials, when they were started and completed, and whether they were terminated early.

Results: We identified a total of 110 trials as of the end of April 2022: 78 complete, 13 recruiting, seven registered on clinicaltrials.gov but not yet recruiting, five trials that were abandoned before enrolling any subjects, and seven trials in early planning. Nine of the 78 completed trials were pilot or feasibility trials. Of 69 completed full trials, 30 (43.5%) were terminated early. The most common reason for early termination was futility (15 trials, 25.0%) followed by poor recruitment (10 trials, 14.5%). The rate of conduct of trials has been remarkably constant since 2001, with roughly 18 trials started in each 5-year period.

Conclusions: We have compiled a census of trials conducted under the U.S. FDA's EFIC rule, the availability of which we hope will stimulate further in-depth data collection and analysis of this set of trials.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在美国知情同意规则例外情况下进行的临床试验普查。
背景:1996年通过了知情同意(EFIC)规则的例外,允许在某些紧急研究中放弃知情同意,包括由美国政府资助的试验。如果可行的话,该规则要求患者或其合法授权代表(LAR)事先同意。对于那些未经同意而参加的患者,必须尽早给予患者或其注册律师选择退出继续参与的机会。我们试图对根据EFIC规则进行的试验进行普查,以促进研究,以便更好地了解该规则是如何使用的。方法:我们进行了多管齐下的搜索,以确定所有在EFIC规则下进行的试验,利用综述,数据库搜索,检查FDA的摘要,在机构审查委员会论坛上发布查询,并向所有已发表的EFIC试验和相关评论文章的主要作者发出电子邮件请求。我们描述了试验的开始和结束时间,以及它们是否提前终止。结果:截至2022年4月底,我们共确定了110项试验:78项完成,13项招募,7项在clinicaltrials.gov上注册但尚未招募,5项试验在纳入受试者之前被放弃,7项试验在早期计划中。在完成的78项试验中,有9项是试点试验或可行性试验。在69个完成的完整试验中,30个(43.5%)提前终止。早期终止妊娠最常见的原因是不孕(15项试验,25.0%),其次是招募不良(10项试验,14.5%)。自2001年以来,进行审判的速度一直非常稳定,每5年大约有18个审判开始。结论:我们编制了一份根据美国FDA的EFIC规则进行的试验普查,我们希望它的可用性将刺激进一步深入的数据收集和分析这组试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Emergency Medicine
Academic Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Emergency Medicine (AEM) is the official monthly publication of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) and publishes information relevant to the practice, educational advancements, and investigation of emergency medicine. It is the second-largest peer-reviewed scientific journal in the specialty of emergency medicine. The goal of AEM is to advance the science, education, and clinical practice of emergency medicine, to serve as a voice for the academic emergency medicine community, and to promote SAEM''s goals and objectives. Members and non-members worldwide depend on this journal for translational medicine relevant to emergency medicine, as well as for clinical news, case studies and more. Each issue contains information relevant to the research, educational advancements, and practice in emergency medicine. Subject matter is diverse, including preclinical studies, clinical topics, health policy, and educational methods. The research of SAEM members contributes significantly to the scientific content and development of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Recovering lost opportunities in the management of critically ill patients boarding in the emergency department. Ten-percentage-points difference is not enough for a better experience in getting timely care for emergent patients. GRACE-4 letter to the editor "Opening invisible wounds" response. Algorithmic identification of overlapping abstract submissions at the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine annual meeting. Effect of administration sequence of induction agents on first-attempt failure during emergency intubation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1