Elderly Patient Involvement in the Decision-Making Process of Breast Cancer Management in Kuwait.

Q3 Medicine The gulf journal of oncology Pub Date : 2023-01-01
Afrah Aladwani, Faisal Alterkait, Alexander Mullen, Emad Eldosouky
{"title":"Elderly Patient Involvement in the Decision-Making Process of Breast Cancer Management in Kuwait.","authors":"Afrah Aladwani,&nbsp;Faisal Alterkait,&nbsp;Alexander Mullen,&nbsp;Emad Eldosouky","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Worldwide statistics highlight that around 40% of breast cancer cases occur in patients aged 65 years and above, with expectations that this will increase as the population gets older. Cancer management in elderly patients is still unclear and depends primarily on individual oncologist decisions. The literature suggests that elderly breast cancer patients receive less intensive chemotherapy than younger patients, which is mainly attributed to a lack of effective individualized assessment or age bias. The current study explored the impact of elderly patient involvement in the decision-making process of breast cancer management and less intensive treatment allocation in Kuwait.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In an observational exploratory populationbased study, 60 newly diagnosed breast cancer patients aged 60 years and above and candidates for chemotherapy were included. Patients were grouped based on the treating oncologists' decision to receive either intensive first-line chemotherapy (standard treatment) or less intensive/ other than first-line chemotherapy (non-standard treatment) according to standardized international guidelines recommendations. Patients' attitudes toward the recommended treatment (accept/ reject) were documented through a short semi-structured interview. The prevalence of patients' interference with the treatment was reported, and individual causes were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data showed that 58.8% and 41.2% of elderly patients were allocated for intensive and less intensive treatment, respectively. Overall, 15% of patients interfered with the treatment plan against their oncologists' recommendations even though they were allocated for less intensive treatment. Among those, 6.7% of patients rejected the recommended treatment, 3.3% delayed initiating treatment, and 5% received <3 cycles of chemotherapy but refused to continue cytotoxic treatment. None of the patients requested intensive treatment. This interference was mainly directed by cytotoxic treatment toxicity concerns and targeted treatment preference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In clinical practice, oncologists allocate selected breast cancer patients aged 60 years and above for less intensive cytotoxic treatment to enhance their tolerance; however, this was not always associated with patients' acceptance and compliance. Lack of awareness of targeted treatment indications and utilization directed 15% of patients to reject, delay, or refuse to continue the recommended cytotoxic treatment against their oncologists' recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":53633,"journal":{"name":"The gulf journal of oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The gulf journal of oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Worldwide statistics highlight that around 40% of breast cancer cases occur in patients aged 65 years and above, with expectations that this will increase as the population gets older. Cancer management in elderly patients is still unclear and depends primarily on individual oncologist decisions. The literature suggests that elderly breast cancer patients receive less intensive chemotherapy than younger patients, which is mainly attributed to a lack of effective individualized assessment or age bias. The current study explored the impact of elderly patient involvement in the decision-making process of breast cancer management and less intensive treatment allocation in Kuwait.

Methods: In an observational exploratory populationbased study, 60 newly diagnosed breast cancer patients aged 60 years and above and candidates for chemotherapy were included. Patients were grouped based on the treating oncologists' decision to receive either intensive first-line chemotherapy (standard treatment) or less intensive/ other than first-line chemotherapy (non-standard treatment) according to standardized international guidelines recommendations. Patients' attitudes toward the recommended treatment (accept/ reject) were documented through a short semi-structured interview. The prevalence of patients' interference with the treatment was reported, and individual causes were investigated.

Results: Data showed that 58.8% and 41.2% of elderly patients were allocated for intensive and less intensive treatment, respectively. Overall, 15% of patients interfered with the treatment plan against their oncologists' recommendations even though they were allocated for less intensive treatment. Among those, 6.7% of patients rejected the recommended treatment, 3.3% delayed initiating treatment, and 5% received <3 cycles of chemotherapy but refused to continue cytotoxic treatment. None of the patients requested intensive treatment. This interference was mainly directed by cytotoxic treatment toxicity concerns and targeted treatment preference.

Conclusion: In clinical practice, oncologists allocate selected breast cancer patients aged 60 years and above for less intensive cytotoxic treatment to enhance their tolerance; however, this was not always associated with patients' acceptance and compliance. Lack of awareness of targeted treatment indications and utilization directed 15% of patients to reject, delay, or refuse to continue the recommended cytotoxic treatment against their oncologists' recommendations.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年患者参与科威特乳腺癌管理决策过程。
导读:世界范围内的统计数据显示,大约40%的乳腺癌病例发生在65岁及以上的患者中,预计随着人口老龄化,这一比例将会增加。老年患者的癌症管理仍不清楚,主要取决于个体肿瘤学家的决定。文献表明,老年乳腺癌患者接受的化疗强度低于年轻患者,这主要是由于缺乏有效的个体化评估或年龄偏见。目前的研究探讨了科威特老年患者参与乳腺癌管理和低强度治疗分配决策过程的影响。方法:在一项基于人群的观察性探索性研究中,纳入60例60岁及以上的新诊断乳腺癌患者和化疗候选者。患者根据治疗肿瘤学家的决定进行分组,根据标准化的国际指南建议接受强化一线化疗(标准治疗)或较弱/非一线化疗(非标准治疗)。通过简短的半结构化访谈记录患者对推荐治疗的态度(接受/拒绝)。报告了患者干扰治疗的发生率,并调查了个体原因。结果:数据显示,58.8%和41.2%的老年患者被分配到强化治疗和低强化治疗。总体而言,15%的患者不按照肿瘤学家的建议干预治疗计划,即使他们被分配到较低强度的治疗。其中,6.7%的患者拒绝推荐治疗,3.3%的患者延迟开始治疗,5%的患者接受了推荐治疗。结论:在临床实践中,肿瘤学家会选择60岁及以上的乳腺癌患者进行低强度的细胞毒治疗,以增强患者的耐受性;然而,这并不总是与患者的接受和依从性有关。由于缺乏对靶向治疗适应证和使用的认识,15%的患者拒绝、延迟或拒绝继续接受肿瘤医生推荐的细胞毒性治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The gulf journal of oncology
The gulf journal of oncology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
Assessing Mismatch Repair Expression by Immunohistochemistry in Colorectal Adenocarcinoma -Insight from a Tertiary Care Centre. Assessment of Radiation Induced Pneumonitis and Pericarditis in Patients Undergoing Breast Conservative Treatment Using Hypofractionated Simultaneous Integrated Boost Technique. Comparison of Acute Toxicities, Overall Treatment Time and Quality of Life in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Treated with IMRT and Helical Tomotherapy. Cost of Healthcare Services in Geriatric Neuro-oncology: A descriptive Analysis. Establishing and Monitoring an Effective Management of Benign Nontoxic Multinodular Goitre in Kuwait "Utilizing Two Different Dose Levels of Recombinant Human TSH in Combination with Radioactive Iodine".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1