Policies and Practices on Out-of-Hospital Birth: a Review of Qualitative Studies in the Time of Coronavirus.

IF 1 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Current Sexual Health Reports Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1007/s11930-022-00354-7
Patrizia Quattrocchi
{"title":"Policies and Practices on Out-of-Hospital Birth: a Review of Qualitative Studies in the Time of Coronavirus.","authors":"Patrizia Quattrocchi","doi":"10.1007/s11930-022-00354-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The purpose of this review is to summarize the current knowledge on out-of-hospital births (at home or in an independent birth center) in high-income countries in the time of coronavirus. Qualitative studies published between 2020 and 2022 providing findings on women's and health providers' perspectives and experiences, as well as policies and practices implemented, are synthetized.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of women choosing the home or a birth center to deliver has grown considerably. Main reasons for this choice include fear of contagion in facilities and restrictions during delivery and the post-partum period, especially women's separation from their companion of choice and their newborn. Findings suggest that homebirth within a public model has several advantages in the experience of birth for both women and professionals during the pandemic period, maintaining the benefits of biomedicine when needed.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, the interest in out-of-hospital birth increased in high-income countries, and the number of women choosing the home or a birth center to deliver has grown considerably. This review aims to give a more in-depth understanding of women's and health providers' perspectives on and experiences of out-of-hospital birth services during this period. Twenty-five studies in different countries, including the USA, Canada, Australia, Switzerland, the Netherlands, the UK, Spain, Croatia, and Norway, were reviewed. Findings stress that out-of-hospital birth has allowed women to deliver according to their wishes and needs. In addition, the pandemic experience represents an opportunity for policy to better support and integrate out-of-hospital services in the health care system in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":29957,"journal":{"name":"Current Sexual Health Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"36-48"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9735103/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Sexual Health Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-022-00354-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: The purpose of this review is to summarize the current knowledge on out-of-hospital births (at home or in an independent birth center) in high-income countries in the time of coronavirus. Qualitative studies published between 2020 and 2022 providing findings on women's and health providers' perspectives and experiences, as well as policies and practices implemented, are synthetized.

Recent findings: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of women choosing the home or a birth center to deliver has grown considerably. Main reasons for this choice include fear of contagion in facilities and restrictions during delivery and the post-partum period, especially women's separation from their companion of choice and their newborn. Findings suggest that homebirth within a public model has several advantages in the experience of birth for both women and professionals during the pandemic period, maintaining the benefits of biomedicine when needed.

Summary: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the interest in out-of-hospital birth increased in high-income countries, and the number of women choosing the home or a birth center to deliver has grown considerably. This review aims to give a more in-depth understanding of women's and health providers' perspectives on and experiences of out-of-hospital birth services during this period. Twenty-five studies in different countries, including the USA, Canada, Australia, Switzerland, the Netherlands, the UK, Spain, Croatia, and Norway, were reviewed. Findings stress that out-of-hospital birth has allowed women to deliver according to their wishes and needs. In addition, the pandemic experience represents an opportunity for policy to better support and integrate out-of-hospital services in the health care system in the future.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
院外分娩政策与实践:冠状病毒时期定性研究综述
综述目的:本综述的目的是总结目前关于冠状病毒时期高收入国家院外分娩(在家或在独立分娩中心)的知识。综合了2020年至2022年期间发表的定性研究,这些研究提供了关于妇女和保健提供者的观点和经验以及实施的政策和做法的调查结果。最新发现:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,选择在家或分娩中心分娩的妇女人数大幅增加。这一选择的主要原因包括害怕在设施中传染以及分娩和产后期间受到限制,特别是妇女与其选择的伴侣和新生儿分离。调查结果表明,在公共模式下的家庭分娩在大流行期间对妇女和专业人员的分娩经验有若干优势,在需要时保持生物医学的好处。总结:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,高收入国家对院外分娩的兴趣有所增加,选择在家或分娩中心分娩的妇女人数大幅增加。本综述旨在更深入地了解妇女和保健提供者对这一时期院外分娩服务的看法和经验。本文回顾了来自美国、加拿大、澳大利亚、瑞士、荷兰、英国、西班牙、克罗地亚和挪威等不同国家的25项研究。调查结果强调,院外分娩允许妇女根据自己的意愿和需要分娩。此外,这次大流行的经验为今后更好地支持院外服务并将其纳入卫生保健系统的政策提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Sexual Health Reports
Current Sexual Health Reports UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
The Subjective Experience of Individuals with Pedohebephilic Interest From Intimate Exams to Ritual Nicking: Interpreting Nonconsensual Medicalized Genital Procedures as Sexual Boundary Violations Virtual Reality Therapy for Sexual Dysfunctions: a Scoping Review Sexual Function Outcomes Following Gender-Affirming Vaginoplasty: a Literature Review Sexual Function and Relationship Satisfaction Among Women Who Have Experienced Intimate Partner Violence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1