Highly differentiated loci resolve phylogenetic relationships in the Bean Goose complex.

Jente Ottenburghs, Johanna Honka, Marja E Heikkinen, Jesper Madsen, Gerhard J D M Müskens, Hans Ellegren
{"title":"Highly differentiated loci resolve phylogenetic relationships in the Bean Goose complex.","authors":"Jente Ottenburghs,&nbsp;Johanna Honka,&nbsp;Marja E Heikkinen,&nbsp;Jesper Madsen,&nbsp;Gerhard J D M Müskens,&nbsp;Hans Ellegren","doi":"10.1186/s12862-023-02103-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reconstructing phylogenetic relationships with genomic data remains a challenging endeavor. Numerous phylogenomic studies have reported incongruent gene trees when analyzing different genomic regions, complicating the search for a 'true' species tree. Some authors have argued that genomic regions of increased divergence (i.e. differentiation islands) reflect the species tree, although other studies have shown that these regions might produce misleading topologies due to species-specific selective sweeps or ancient introgression events. In this study, we tested the extent to which highly differentiated loci can resolve phylogenetic relationships in the Bean Goose complex, a group of goose taxa that includes the Taiga Bean Goose (Anser fabalis), the Tundra Bean Goose (Anser serrirostris) and the Pink-footed Goose (Anser brachyrhynchus).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>First, we show that a random selection of genomic loci-which mainly samples the undifferentiated regions of the genome-results in an unresolved species complex with a monophyletic A. brachyrhynchus embedded within a paraphyletic cluster of A. fabalis and A. serrirostris. Next, phylogenetic analyses of differentiation islands converged upon a topology of three monophyletic clades in which A. brachyrhynchus is sister to A. fabalis, and A. serrirostris is sister to the clade uniting these two species. Close inspection of the locus trees within the differentiated regions revealed that this topology was consistently supported over other phylogenetic arrangements. As it seems unlikely that selection or introgression events have impacted all differentiation islands in the same way, we are convinced that this topology reflects the 'true' species tree. Additional analyses, based on D-statistics, revealed extensive introgression between A. fabalis and A. serrirostris, which partly explains the failure to resolve the species complex with a random selection of genomic loci. Recent introgression between these taxa has probably erased the phylogenetic branching pattern across a large section of the genome, whereas differentiation islands were unaffected by the homogenizing gene flow and maintained the phylogenetic patterns that reflect the species tree.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The evolution of the Bean Goose complex can be depicted as a simple bifurcating tree, but this would ignore the impact of introgressive hybridization. Hence, we advocate that the evolutionary relationships between these taxa are best represented as a phylogenetic network.</p>","PeriodicalId":9127,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ecology and Evolution","volume":"23 1","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9854053/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Ecology and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-023-02103-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Reconstructing phylogenetic relationships with genomic data remains a challenging endeavor. Numerous phylogenomic studies have reported incongruent gene trees when analyzing different genomic regions, complicating the search for a 'true' species tree. Some authors have argued that genomic regions of increased divergence (i.e. differentiation islands) reflect the species tree, although other studies have shown that these regions might produce misleading topologies due to species-specific selective sweeps or ancient introgression events. In this study, we tested the extent to which highly differentiated loci can resolve phylogenetic relationships in the Bean Goose complex, a group of goose taxa that includes the Taiga Bean Goose (Anser fabalis), the Tundra Bean Goose (Anser serrirostris) and the Pink-footed Goose (Anser brachyrhynchus).

Results: First, we show that a random selection of genomic loci-which mainly samples the undifferentiated regions of the genome-results in an unresolved species complex with a monophyletic A. brachyrhynchus embedded within a paraphyletic cluster of A. fabalis and A. serrirostris. Next, phylogenetic analyses of differentiation islands converged upon a topology of three monophyletic clades in which A. brachyrhynchus is sister to A. fabalis, and A. serrirostris is sister to the clade uniting these two species. Close inspection of the locus trees within the differentiated regions revealed that this topology was consistently supported over other phylogenetic arrangements. As it seems unlikely that selection or introgression events have impacted all differentiation islands in the same way, we are convinced that this topology reflects the 'true' species tree. Additional analyses, based on D-statistics, revealed extensive introgression between A. fabalis and A. serrirostris, which partly explains the failure to resolve the species complex with a random selection of genomic loci. Recent introgression between these taxa has probably erased the phylogenetic branching pattern across a large section of the genome, whereas differentiation islands were unaffected by the homogenizing gene flow and maintained the phylogenetic patterns that reflect the species tree.

Conclusions: The evolution of the Bean Goose complex can be depicted as a simple bifurcating tree, but this would ignore the impact of introgressive hybridization. Hence, we advocate that the evolutionary relationships between these taxa are best represented as a phylogenetic network.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高度分化的位点解决了豆鹅复合体的系统发育关系。
背景:利用基因组数据重建系统发育关系仍然是一项具有挑战性的工作。许多系统基因组学研究报告了在分析不同基因组区域时不一致的基因树,使寻找“真正的”物种树变得复杂。一些作者认为,增加分化的基因组区域(即分化岛)反映了物种树,尽管其他研究表明,这些区域可能由于物种特异性选择性扫描或古老的渗入事件而产生误导性的拓扑结构。在这项研究中,我们测试了高分化位点在豆鹅复合体中解决系统发育关系的程度,豆鹅复合体是一组鹅分类群,包括Taiga豆鹅(Anser fabalis), Tundra豆鹅(Anser serrirostris)和粉足鹅(Anser brachyrhynchus)。结果:首先,我们发现基因组位点的随机选择(主要是基因组未分化区域的样本)导致了一个未解决的物种复合体,即单系的短舌甲嵌入了副系的fabalis和serrirostris群中。接下来,分化岛的系统发育分析集中在三个单系进化枝的拓扑结构上,其中a . brachyrhynchus是a . fabalis的姐妹,a . serrirostris是将这两个物种结合在一起的进化枝的姐妹。对不同区域内基因座树的仔细观察表明,这种拓扑结构与其他系统发育安排相比得到了一致的支持。由于选择或渐渗事件似乎不太可能以相同的方式影响所有分化岛,我们确信这种拓扑结构反映了“真正的”物种树。另外,基于d -统计的分析显示,蚕豆和serrirostris之间存在广泛的渐渗,这在一定程度上解释了随机选择基因组位点无法解决物种复杂问题的原因。最近这些分类群之间的渐渗可能抹去了大部分基因组的系统发育分支模式,而分化岛不受均质化基因流的影响,保持了反映物种树的系统发育模式。结论:豆鹅复合体的进化可以描述为一个简单的分岔树,但这忽略了渐进杂交的影响。因此,我们主张这些分类群之间的进化关系最好代表为一个系统发育网络。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Genomics of hybrid parallel origin in Aquilegia ecalcarata Resolving the phylogeny of Thladiantha (Cucurbitaceae) with three different target capture pipelines Peripatric speciation within Torreya fargesii (Taxaceae) in the Hengduan Mountains inferred from multi-loci phylogeography Ecosystem restoration, regeneration and rewilding. Native amphibian toxin reduces invasive crayfish feeding with potential benefits to stream biodiversity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1