{"title":"Discrimination Based on Physical Attractiveness: Causes and Consequences <i>A Critical Perspective</i>.","authors":"Bhawana Maheshwari","doi":"10.1177/00332941221149174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The consequences of physical attractiveness (PA) are ubiquitous, however not often become a topic of discussion. The consequences, in general, are attributed to preference or discrimination without much deliberation. There is a very thin line between the two. The study makes an attempt to distinguish between preference and discrimination based on PA. In an organizational context, this distinction seems warranted since PA does impact work-related outcomes. The distinction was addressed by examining published studies between 1970 and 2021 on PA in the management and economics field of research. The study highlights when and how preference turns into discrimination and furthers discusses the causes of such discrimination. The causes are equivalent to antecedents; the antecedent to being physically attractive is mostly genes. The antecedents to the discrimination are the attributions that we have associated with being physically attractive. The study highlights these attributions and the reasons for these attributions. To completely understand a phenomenon, it is essential to understand what causes it. Therefore, this study tries to understand what causes discrimination based on PA. The study has implications for diversity and inclusion literature and practice. It also adds to the literature on PA.</p>","PeriodicalId":21149,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Reports","volume":" ","pages":"2855-2872"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941221149174","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The consequences of physical attractiveness (PA) are ubiquitous, however not often become a topic of discussion. The consequences, in general, are attributed to preference or discrimination without much deliberation. There is a very thin line between the two. The study makes an attempt to distinguish between preference and discrimination based on PA. In an organizational context, this distinction seems warranted since PA does impact work-related outcomes. The distinction was addressed by examining published studies between 1970 and 2021 on PA in the management and economics field of research. The study highlights when and how preference turns into discrimination and furthers discusses the causes of such discrimination. The causes are equivalent to antecedents; the antecedent to being physically attractive is mostly genes. The antecedents to the discrimination are the attributions that we have associated with being physically attractive. The study highlights these attributions and the reasons for these attributions. To completely understand a phenomenon, it is essential to understand what causes it. Therefore, this study tries to understand what causes discrimination based on PA. The study has implications for diversity and inclusion literature and practice. It also adds to the literature on PA.
身体吸引力(PA)的后果无处不在,但并不经常成为讨论的话题。一般来说,这些后果被归结为偏好或歧视,而没有经过深思熟虑。这两者之间只有一线之隔。本研究试图区分基于 PA 的偏好和歧视。在组织环境中,这种区分似乎是有道理的,因为 PA 确实会影响与工作相关的结果。通过研究 1970 年至 2021 年间在管理学和经济学研究领域发表的有关 PA 的研究报告,对两者进行了区分。研究强调了偏好何时以及如何转化为歧视,并进一步讨论了这种歧视的原因。原因等同于前因;具有身体吸引力的前因主要是基因。而歧视的前因则是我们对具有身体吸引力的归因。本研究强调了这些归因以及产生这些归因的原因。要完全理解一种现象,就必须了解造成这种现象的原因。因此,本研究试图了解导致基于 PA 的歧视的原因。本研究对多样性和包容性文献及实践具有重要意义。它还为有关 PA 的文献增添了新的内容。