Prediction of Low-intensity Physical Activity in Stable Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Atsuyoshi Kawagoshi, Masahiro Iwakura, Yutaka Furukawa, Keiyu Sugawara, Hitomi Takahashi, Takanobu Shioya
{"title":"Prediction of Low-intensity Physical Activity in Stable Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.","authors":"Atsuyoshi Kawagoshi,&nbsp;Masahiro Iwakura,&nbsp;Yutaka Furukawa,&nbsp;Keiyu Sugawara,&nbsp;Hitomi Takahashi,&nbsp;Takanobu Shioya","doi":"10.1298/ptr.E10208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop an equation of the predicted amount of low-intensity physical activity (LPA) by analyzing clinical parameters in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, we analyzed the assessments of clinical parameters evaluated every 6 months from the start of pulmonary rehabilitation in 53 outpatients with stable COPD (age 77 ± 6 yrs; 46 men; body mass index 21.8 ± 4.1 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; forced expiratory volume in one second 63.0 ± 26.4% pred). An uniaxial accelerometer was used to measure the number of steps and the time spent in LPA of 1.8-2.3 metabolic equivalents during 14 consecutive days. We also evaluated body composition, respiratory function, skeletal muscle strength, inspiratory muscle strength, exercise capacity, and gait speed. Factors associated with the time spent in LPA were examined by multivariate regression analysis. Internal validity between the predicted amount of LPA obtained by the equation and the measured amount was examined by regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multivariate regression analysis revealed that gait speed (β = 0.369, p = 0.007) and maximum inspiratory mouth pressure (PI<sub>max</sub>) (β = 0.329, p = 0.016) were significant influence factors on LPA (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.354, p <0.001). The stepwise regression analysis showed a moderate correlation between the measured amount and predicted amount of LPA calculated by the regression equation (r = 0.609, p <0.001; LPA = 31.909 × gait speed + 0.202 × PI<sub>max</sub> - 20.553).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Gait speed and PI<sub>max</sub> were extracted as influence factors on LPA, suggesting that the regression equation could predict the amount of LPA.</p>","PeriodicalId":74445,"journal":{"name":"Physical therapy research","volume":"25 3","pages":"143-149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9910347/pdf/ptr-25-143.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical therapy research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1298/ptr.E10208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To develop an equation of the predicted amount of low-intensity physical activity (LPA) by analyzing clinical parameters in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we analyzed the assessments of clinical parameters evaluated every 6 months from the start of pulmonary rehabilitation in 53 outpatients with stable COPD (age 77 ± 6 yrs; 46 men; body mass index 21.8 ± 4.1 kg/m2; forced expiratory volume in one second 63.0 ± 26.4% pred). An uniaxial accelerometer was used to measure the number of steps and the time spent in LPA of 1.8-2.3 metabolic equivalents during 14 consecutive days. We also evaluated body composition, respiratory function, skeletal muscle strength, inspiratory muscle strength, exercise capacity, and gait speed. Factors associated with the time spent in LPA were examined by multivariate regression analysis. Internal validity between the predicted amount of LPA obtained by the equation and the measured amount was examined by regression analysis.

Results: Multivariate regression analysis revealed that gait speed (β = 0.369, p = 0.007) and maximum inspiratory mouth pressure (PImax) (β = 0.329, p = 0.016) were significant influence factors on LPA (R2 = 0.354, p <0.001). The stepwise regression analysis showed a moderate correlation between the measured amount and predicted amount of LPA calculated by the regression equation (r = 0.609, p <0.001; LPA = 31.909 × gait speed + 0.202 × PImax - 20.553).

Conclusion: Gait speed and PImax were extracted as influence factors on LPA, suggesting that the regression equation could predict the amount of LPA.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者低强度体力活动的预测
目的:通过分析慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的临床参数,建立预测低强度体力活动(LPA)量的方程。方法:在这项横断面研究中,我们分析了53例稳定期COPD门诊患者(年龄77±6岁;46人。体质指数21.8±4.1 kg/m2;1秒用力呼气量(63.0±26.4%)。使用单轴加速度计测量连续14天1.8-2.3代谢当量的LPA步数和时间。我们还评估了身体组成、呼吸功能、骨骼肌力量、吸气肌力量、运动能力和步态速度。多变量回归分析与LPA时间相关的因素。用回归分析检验了方程预测的LPA量与实测量之间的内效度。结果:多因素回归分析显示,步态速度(β = 0.369, p = 0.007)和最大吸气口压(PImax) (β = 0.329, p = 0.016)是影响LPA的显著因素(R2 = 0.354, p max - 20.553)。结论:提取步态速度和PImax作为LPA的影响因素,表明回归方程可以预测LPA的量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development and Validation of a Decision Tree Analysis Model for Predicting Home Discharge in a Convalescent Ward: A Single Institution Study. Early Ambulation Following Lung Resection Surgery: Impact on Short-term Outcomes in Patients with Lung Cancer. Effects of Isometric Quadriceps Muscle Exercise with Visual and Auditory Feedback at 1 Year after Total Knee Arthroplasty. Family-centered Care for Children with Disabilities in Japan-the Origin and Future of the "Ryouiku". The Assessment and Response of Rehabilitation Professionals to Sudden Deterioration in Symptoms: An Analysis of the National Database in Japan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1