Menstrual cup and risk of IUD expulsion - a systematic review.

Nicola Bowman, Annette Thwaites
{"title":"Menstrual cup and risk of IUD expulsion - a systematic review.","authors":"Nicola Bowman,&nbsp;Annette Thwaites","doi":"10.1186/s40834-022-00203-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The menstrual cup is a safe, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly menstrual product which is increasing in usage, especially in younger women. The potential risk for concomitant menstrual cup use to increase IUD expulsion has been raised over the last 10 years, however, few studies assess this. This systematic review aims to identify, appraise and synthesize the current specific evidence on menstrual cup use and risk of partial or total IUD expulsion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, and the Cochrane Library were searched for publications available in English, until February 20th, 2021. Quantitative and qualitative studies, systematic reviews and case series reports were included. Websites of menstrual cup manufacturers LenaCup®, DivaCup®, Lunette®, AllMatters® and Saalt® were searched for warnings relevant to IUD expulsion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies were included in this review, comprising 73 partial or total IUD expulsion events in patients with IUD contraception using menstrual cups. The case study reports included two individuals who each experienced two and three expulsions respectively. Of the seven publications, three reported expulsion rates of 3.7%, 17.3% and 18.6%. Time to expulsion ranged from less than one week to two and a half years. These three studies disagree on whether there is a statistically significant association between menstrual cup use and IUD expulsion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a possible association between menstrual cup use and increased risk of IUD expulsion and this information should be shared with patients. However evidence is scarce and high-quality randomised controlled trials are needed to address this risk and the impact of factors such as age, menstrual cup removal technique, pelvic anatomy, IUD type, and measures such as cutting the IUD strings short or delaying menstrual cup use for a period post-insertion. This research gap is limiting patients' ability to make informed choices regarding intrauterine contraception and menstrual management and must urgently be addressed in the context of rising IUD and menstrual cup use, particularly among a younger demographic who are seeking highly effective contraception.</p>","PeriodicalId":10637,"journal":{"name":"Contraception and Reproductive Medicine","volume":"8 1","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9863186/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception and Reproductive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-022-00203-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: The menstrual cup is a safe, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly menstrual product which is increasing in usage, especially in younger women. The potential risk for concomitant menstrual cup use to increase IUD expulsion has been raised over the last 10 years, however, few studies assess this. This systematic review aims to identify, appraise and synthesize the current specific evidence on menstrual cup use and risk of partial or total IUD expulsion.

Methods: PubMed, and the Cochrane Library were searched for publications available in English, until February 20th, 2021. Quantitative and qualitative studies, systematic reviews and case series reports were included. Websites of menstrual cup manufacturers LenaCup®, DivaCup®, Lunette®, AllMatters® and Saalt® were searched for warnings relevant to IUD expulsion.

Results: Seven studies were included in this review, comprising 73 partial or total IUD expulsion events in patients with IUD contraception using menstrual cups. The case study reports included two individuals who each experienced two and three expulsions respectively. Of the seven publications, three reported expulsion rates of 3.7%, 17.3% and 18.6%. Time to expulsion ranged from less than one week to two and a half years. These three studies disagree on whether there is a statistically significant association between menstrual cup use and IUD expulsion.

Conclusion: There is a possible association between menstrual cup use and increased risk of IUD expulsion and this information should be shared with patients. However evidence is scarce and high-quality randomised controlled trials are needed to address this risk and the impact of factors such as age, menstrual cup removal technique, pelvic anatomy, IUD type, and measures such as cutting the IUD strings short or delaying menstrual cup use for a period post-insertion. This research gap is limiting patients' ability to make informed choices regarding intrauterine contraception and menstrual management and must urgently be addressed in the context of rising IUD and menstrual cup use, particularly among a younger demographic who are seeking highly effective contraception.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
月经杯与宫内节育器脱落的风险——一项系统综述。
背景:月经杯是一种安全、经济、环保的月经用品,其使用越来越多,尤其是在年轻女性中。在过去的10年里,伴随使用月经杯增加宫内节育器排出的潜在风险已经被提出,然而,很少有研究对此进行评估。本系统综述旨在识别、评估和综合目前关于月经杯使用和部分或全部宫内节育器脱落风险的具体证据。方法:检索PubMed和Cochrane图书馆的英文版出版物,截止到2021年2月20日。包括定量和定性研究、系统评价和病例系列报告。在月经杯制造商LenaCup®、DivaCup®、Lunette®、AllMatters®和Saalt®的网站上搜索与取出宫内节育器相关的警告。结果:本综述纳入了7项研究,包括使用月经杯避孕的宫内节育器患者的73例部分或全部排出宫内节育器事件。案例研究报告包括两个分别经历了两次和三次驱逐的人。在这7篇论文中,有3篇的开除率分别为3.7%、17.3%和18.6%。被开除的时间从不到一周到两年半不等。这三项研究在使用月经杯和排出宫内节育器之间是否存在统计学上的显著关联上存在分歧。结论:使用月经杯可能与宫内节育器脱落风险增加有关,这一信息应与患者分享。然而,证据缺乏,需要高质量的随机对照试验来解决这种风险以及年龄、月经杯取出技术、骨盆解剖、宫内节育器类型等因素的影响,以及缩短宫内节育器串或在插入后延迟使用月经杯等措施。这一研究差距限制了患者在宫内避孕和月经管理方面做出知情选择的能力,在宫内节育器和月经杯使用不断增加的背景下,特别是在寻求高效避孕的年轻人群中,必须迫切解决这一问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction: Unintended pregnancy and contraceptive use among women in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review and meta-analysis Male characteristics and contraception in four districts of the central region, Ghana. Postpartum family planning uptake in Uganda: findings from the lot quality assurance sampling survey. Assessing the sustainability of two independent voucher-based family planning programs in Pakistan: a 24-months post-intervention evaluation. Emergency contraceptive use of Metronidazole among University female students in Dodoma region of Tanzania: a descriptive cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1