Association between brain volume and disability over time in multiple sclerosis.

Thomas Moridi, Leszek Stawiarz, Kyla A McKay, Benjamin V Ineichen, Russell Ouellette, Daniel Ferreira, J-Sebastian Muehlboeck, Eric Westman, Ingrid Kockum, Tomas Olsson, Fredrik Piehl, Jan Hillert, Ali Manouchehrinia, Tobias Granberg
{"title":"Association between brain volume and disability over time in multiple sclerosis.","authors":"Thomas Moridi,&nbsp;Leszek Stawiarz,&nbsp;Kyla A McKay,&nbsp;Benjamin V Ineichen,&nbsp;Russell Ouellette,&nbsp;Daniel Ferreira,&nbsp;J-Sebastian Muehlboeck,&nbsp;Eric Westman,&nbsp;Ingrid Kockum,&nbsp;Tomas Olsson,&nbsp;Fredrik Piehl,&nbsp;Jan Hillert,&nbsp;Ali Manouchehrinia,&nbsp;Tobias Granberg","doi":"10.1177/20552173221144230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most previous multiple sclerosis (MS) brain atrophy studies using MS impact scale 29 (MSIS-29) or symbol digit modalities test (SDMT) have been cross-sectional with limited sets of clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate which brain and lesion volume metrics show the strongest long-term associations with the expanded disability status scale (EDSS), SDMT, and MSIS-29, and whether MRI-clinical associations vary with age.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We acquired MRI and clinical data from a real-world Swedish MS cohort. FreeSurfer and SPM Lesion Segmentation Tool were used to obtain brain parenchymal, cortical and subcortical grey matter, thalamic and white matter fractions as well as T<sub>1</sub>- and T<sub>2</sub>-lesion volumes. Mixed-effects and rolling regression models were used in the statistical analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 989 persons with MS followed for a median of 9.3 (EDSS), 10.1 (SDMT), and 9.3 (MSIS-29) years, respectively. In a cross-sectional analysis, the strength of the associations of the MRI metrics with the EDSS and MSIS-29 was found to drastically increase after 40-50 years of age. Low baseline regional grey matter fractions were associated with longitudinal increase of EDSS and physical MSIS-29 scores and decrease in SDMT scores and these atrophy measures were stronger predictors than the lesion volumes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The strength of MRI-clinical associations increase with age. Grey matter volume fractions are stronger predictors of long-term disability measures than lesion volumes.</p>","PeriodicalId":18961,"journal":{"name":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental, Translational and Clinical","volume":"8 4","pages":"20552173221144230"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9768834/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental, Translational and Clinical","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552173221144230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Most previous multiple sclerosis (MS) brain atrophy studies using MS impact scale 29 (MSIS-29) or symbol digit modalities test (SDMT) have been cross-sectional with limited sets of clinical outcomes.

Objectives: To investigate which brain and lesion volume metrics show the strongest long-term associations with the expanded disability status scale (EDSS), SDMT, and MSIS-29, and whether MRI-clinical associations vary with age.

Methods: We acquired MRI and clinical data from a real-world Swedish MS cohort. FreeSurfer and SPM Lesion Segmentation Tool were used to obtain brain parenchymal, cortical and subcortical grey matter, thalamic and white matter fractions as well as T1- and T2-lesion volumes. Mixed-effects and rolling regression models were used in the statistical analyses.

Results: We included 989 persons with MS followed for a median of 9.3 (EDSS), 10.1 (SDMT), and 9.3 (MSIS-29) years, respectively. In a cross-sectional analysis, the strength of the associations of the MRI metrics with the EDSS and MSIS-29 was found to drastically increase after 40-50 years of age. Low baseline regional grey matter fractions were associated with longitudinal increase of EDSS and physical MSIS-29 scores and decrease in SDMT scores and these atrophy measures were stronger predictors than the lesion volumes.

Conclusions: The strength of MRI-clinical associations increase with age. Grey matter volume fractions are stronger predictors of long-term disability measures than lesion volumes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多发性硬化症脑容量与残疾之间的关系。
背景:以前大多数使用MS影响量表29 (MSIS-29)或符号数字模式测试(SDMT)的多发性硬化症(MS)脑萎缩研究都是横断面的,临床结果有限。目的:研究哪些脑和病变体积指标与扩展残疾状态量表(EDSS)、SDMT和MSIS-29表现出最强的长期相关性,以及mri临床相关性是否随年龄而变化。方法:我们从真实世界的瑞典MS队列中获得MRI和临床数据。使用FreeSurfer和SPM病变分割工具获得脑实质、皮层和皮层下灰质、丘脑和白质分数以及T1和t2病变体积。统计分析采用混合效应和滚动回归模型。结果:我们纳入了989例MS患者,随访时间中位数分别为9.3年(EDSS)、10.1年(SDMT)和9.3年(MSIS-29)。在横断面分析中,发现MRI指标与EDSS和MSIS-29的关联强度在40-50岁后急剧增加。低基线区域灰质分数与EDSS和物理MSIS-29评分的纵向增加和SDMT评分的下降有关,这些萎缩指标比病变体积更强。结论:mri临床关联的强度随着年龄的增长而增加。灰质体积分数比病变体积更能预测长期残疾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic pathways and barriers in multiple sclerosis in Zambia: A qualitative study. Baricitinib triggering a central nervous system inflammatory-demyelinating disease: A case report. Apolipoprotein E4 and its later-life health effects on the multiple sclerosis population. The impact of relapse on patient disability, clinical outcomes, and subsequent burdens to patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and caregivers. Setting priorities for how future research in multiple sclerosis in Canada considers equity, diversity and inclusion: A modified e-Delphi study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1