Patient safety culture in a COVID-19 ICU compared to a clinical-surgical ICU in the Brazilian Eastern Amazon: A cross-sectional study.

Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3233/JRS-210071
Maria Luiza Rodrigues Dos Santos, Victória Brioso Tavares, Natália Silva da Costa, Marcos Valério Santos da Silva, João Simão de Melo-Neto
{"title":"Patient safety culture in a COVID-19 ICU compared to a clinical-surgical ICU in the Brazilian Eastern Amazon: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Maria Luiza Rodrigues Dos Santos,&nbsp;Victória Brioso Tavares,&nbsp;Natália Silva da Costa,&nbsp;Marcos Valério Santos da Silva,&nbsp;João Simão de Melo-Neto","doi":"10.3233/JRS-210071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for a new dynamic in the organization and practices of health services, as it required rapid restructuring to promote safe and harm-free assistance.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the dimensions of the patient safety culture (PSC) from the perspective of the health team professionals in clinical-surgical ICU (G1) compared to a COVID-19 ICU (G2).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional, analytical, descriptive and inferential study, using the \"Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture\" questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The domain \"Supervisor/Manager Expectations and Actions Promoting Patient Safety (PS)\" was a potential weakness for G1 (p = 0.003). G2 was most positive on improving PS, being informed about errors, considering PS as a top priority to management, and that the units work together to provide the best care (p > 0.05). G1 was most negative about the work culture with staff from other units, exchange of information across units, and shift changes (p > 0.05). The highest PS grade was related to greater communication, and a smaller frequency of events was reported only for G2 (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There must be a balance in terms of attention focused on PS between different ICUs in times of crisis, especially regarding the supervisors/managers actions.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/JRS-210071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for a new dynamic in the organization and practices of health services, as it required rapid restructuring to promote safe and harm-free assistance.

Objective: To assess the dimensions of the patient safety culture (PSC) from the perspective of the health team professionals in clinical-surgical ICU (G1) compared to a COVID-19 ICU (G2).

Methods: Cross-sectional, analytical, descriptive and inferential study, using the "Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture" questionnaire.

Results: The domain "Supervisor/Manager Expectations and Actions Promoting Patient Safety (PS)" was a potential weakness for G1 (p = 0.003). G2 was most positive on improving PS, being informed about errors, considering PS as a top priority to management, and that the units work together to provide the best care (p > 0.05). G1 was most negative about the work culture with staff from other units, exchange of information across units, and shift changes (p > 0.05). The highest PS grade was related to greater communication, and a smaller frequency of events was reported only for G2 (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: There must be a balance in terms of attention focused on PS between different ICUs in times of crisis, especially regarding the supervisors/managers actions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
巴西东亚马逊地区COVID-19重症监护室与临床外科重症监护室的患者安全文化比较:一项横断面研究
背景:2019冠状病毒病大流行突出表明,卫生服务的组织和做法需要一种新的动态,因为它需要快速重组,以促进安全和无害的援助。目的:从临床外科ICU (G1)与COVID-19 ICU (G2)的卫生团队专业人员的角度评估患者安全培养(PSC)的维度。方法:采用“医院患者安全文化调查”问卷进行横断面、分析、描述和推理研究。结果:“主管/经理期望和行动促进患者安全(PS)”领域是G1的潜在弱点(p = 0.003)。G2最积极的是改善PS,被告知错误,将PS视为管理的首要任务,各单位共同努力提供最佳护理(p > 0.05)。G1对与其他单位员工的工作文化、跨单位信息交流和轮班变化最为负面(p > 0.05)。最高的PS分级与更大的沟通有关,只有G2的事件发生频率较小(p > 0.05)。结论:在危机时刻,不同icu之间对PS的关注程度必须达到平衡,特别是在主管/管理人员的行动方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1