Patient-Specific Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking Approach for Scar Detection in Concomitant Ischemic and Non-Ischemic Heart Disease.

Malgorzata Polacin, Tobias Hünermund, Oliver Müggler, Hatem Alkadhi, Sebastian Kozerke, Robert Manka
{"title":"Patient-Specific Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking Approach for Scar Detection in Concomitant Ischemic and Non-Ischemic Heart Disease.","authors":"Malgorzata Polacin,&nbsp;Tobias Hünermund,&nbsp;Oliver Müggler,&nbsp;Hatem Alkadhi,&nbsp;Sebastian Kozerke,&nbsp;Robert Manka","doi":"10.26502/fccm.92920297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study investigated a patient-specific approach of using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) feature tracking for scar detection in a heterogenous patient group with chronic ischemic and non-ischemic heart disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CMR exams of 89 patients with concomitant chronic ischemic and non-ischemic heart disease (IHD+) as well as 65 patients with ischemic scars only (IHD) were retrospectively evaluated. In all patients, global (GCS) and segmental circumferential strain (SCS) was derived from native cine images using a dedicated software (Segment CMR, Medviso). After calculation of patient-specific median GCS (GCS<sub>median</sub>), segmental values from GCS<sub>median</sub> percentage plots were correlated with corresponding myocardial segments in late gadolinium enhancement (LGE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall GCS ranged between -3.5% to -19.8% and average GCS was lower in IHD+ than in IHD (p <0.05). In IHD, 19% of all myocardial segments were infarcted, in IHD+ 16.6%. Additionally, non-ischemic LGE was present in 6.7% of segments in IHD+. Correlation of GCS<sub>median</sub> percentage plots with corresponding LGE showed that presence of ischemic scar tissue in a myocardial segment was very likely below a cut-off of 39.5% GCS<sub>median</sub> (87.5% sensitivity, 86.3% specificity, AUC 0.907, 95% CI 0.875-0.938, p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patient-specific GCS<sub>median</sub> percentage plots calculated from native cine images, ischemic scar tissue can be suspected in myocardial segments below the threshold of 40% GCS<sub>median</sub> (sensitivity 88%, specificity 86%), even in a heterogenous patient cohort with ischemic and non-ischemic heart disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":72523,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine","volume":"6 6","pages":"542-549"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9937585/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26502/fccm.92920297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study investigated a patient-specific approach of using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) feature tracking for scar detection in a heterogenous patient group with chronic ischemic and non-ischemic heart disease.

Methods: CMR exams of 89 patients with concomitant chronic ischemic and non-ischemic heart disease (IHD+) as well as 65 patients with ischemic scars only (IHD) were retrospectively evaluated. In all patients, global (GCS) and segmental circumferential strain (SCS) was derived from native cine images using a dedicated software (Segment CMR, Medviso). After calculation of patient-specific median GCS (GCSmedian), segmental values from GCSmedian percentage plots were correlated with corresponding myocardial segments in late gadolinium enhancement (LGE).

Results: Overall GCS ranged between -3.5% to -19.8% and average GCS was lower in IHD+ than in IHD (p <0.05). In IHD, 19% of all myocardial segments were infarcted, in IHD+ 16.6%. Additionally, non-ischemic LGE was present in 6.7% of segments in IHD+. Correlation of GCSmedian percentage plots with corresponding LGE showed that presence of ischemic scar tissue in a myocardial segment was very likely below a cut-off of 39.5% GCSmedian (87.5% sensitivity, 86.3% specificity, AUC 0.907, 95% CI 0.875-0.938, p < 0.05).

Conclusion: In patient-specific GCSmedian percentage plots calculated from native cine images, ischemic scar tissue can be suspected in myocardial segments below the threshold of 40% GCSmedian (sensitivity 88%, specificity 86%), even in a heterogenous patient cohort with ischemic and non-ischemic heart disease.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者特异性心脏磁共振特征跟踪方法用于伴发缺血性和非缺血性心脏病的疤痕检测。
目的:本研究探讨了一种使用心脏磁共振(CMR)特征跟踪检测慢性缺血性和非缺血性心脏病异质患者组疤痕的患者特异性方法。方法:回顾性分析89例合并慢性缺血性和非缺血性心脏病(IHD+)患者和65例单纯缺血性瘢痕(IHD)患者的CMR检查结果。在所有患者中,使用专用软件(片段CMR, Medviso)从原生电影图像中获得全局(GCS)和节段周向应变(SCS)。计算患者特异性中位GCS (GCSmedian)后,GCSmedian百分比图的段值与晚期钆增强(LGE)相应的心肌段相关。结果:总体GCS范围为-3.5%至-19.8%,IHD+组的平均GCS低于IHD组(相应LGE的p中位数百分比图显示心肌段存在缺血性瘢痕组织很可能低于GCS中位数39.5%的临界值(敏感性87.5%,特异性86.3%,AUC 0.907, 95% CI 0.875-0.938, p < 0.05)。结论:在原生电影图像计算的患者特异性GCSmedian百分比图中,即使在患有缺血性和非缺血性心脏病的异质患者队列中,在低于40% GCSmedian阈值的心肌段中也可以怀疑缺血性瘢痕组织(敏感性88%,特异性86%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Promoting Exercise as a Therapeutic Intervention in Multiple Sclerosis: Barriers, Efficacy, and Social Prescribing Strategies. Nutrition, Gut Microbiota, and Epigenetics in the Modulation of Immune Response and Metabolic Health. Interaction between Perivascular and Luminal Factors in Arteriovenous Fistula in Yucatan Miniswine. Atrial fibrillation in Retinal Artery Occlusions. Immunomodulation and Thrombolytic Approaches in the Management of Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1