Distinct phenotypes of kidney transplant recipients aged 80 years or older in the USA by machine learning consensus clustering.

Charat Thongprayoon, Caroline C Jadlowiec, Shennen A Mao, Michael A Mao, Napat Leeaphorn, Wisit Kaewput, Pattharawin Pattharanitima, Pitchaphon Nissaisorakarn, Matthew Cooper, Wisit Cheungpasitporn
{"title":"Distinct phenotypes of kidney transplant recipients aged 80 years or older in the USA by machine learning consensus clustering.","authors":"Charat Thongprayoon,&nbsp;Caroline C Jadlowiec,&nbsp;Shennen A Mao,&nbsp;Michael A Mao,&nbsp;Napat Leeaphorn,&nbsp;Wisit Kaewput,&nbsp;Pattharawin Pattharanitima,&nbsp;Pitchaphon Nissaisorakarn,&nbsp;Matthew Cooper,&nbsp;Wisit Cheungpasitporn","doi":"10.1136/bmjsit-2022-000137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to identify distinct clusters of very elderly kidney transplant recipients aged ≥80 and assess clinical outcomes among these unique clusters.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cohort study with machine learning (ML) consensus clustering approach.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>All very elderly (age ≥80 at time of transplant) kidney transplant recipients in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database database from 2010 to 2019.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Distinct clusters of very elderly kidney transplant recipients and their post-transplant outcomes including death-censored graft failure, overall mortality and acute allograft rejection among the assigned clusters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consensus cluster analysis was performed in 419 very elderly kidney transplant and identified three distinct clusters that best represented the clinical characteristics of very elderly kidney transplant recipients. Recipients in cluster 1 received standard Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) non-extended criteria donor (ECD) kidneys from deceased donors. Recipients in cluster 2 received kidneys from older, hypertensive ECD deceased donors with a KDPI score ≥85%. Kidneys for cluster 2 patients had longer cold ischaemia time and the highest use of machine perfusion. Recipients in clusters 1 and 2 were more likely to be on dialysis at the time of transplant (88.3%, 89.4%). Recipients in cluster 3 were more likely to be preemptive (39%) or had a dialysis duration less than 1 year (24%). These recipients received living donor kidney transplants. Cluster 3 had the most favourable post-transplant outcomes. Compared with cluster 3, cluster 1 had comparable survival but higher death-censored graft failure, while cluster 2 had lower patient survival, higher death-censored graft failure and more acute rejection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study used an unsupervised ML approach to cluster very elderly kidney transplant recipients into three clinically unique clusters with distinct post-transplant outcomes. These findings from an ML clustering approach provide additional understanding towards individualised medicine and opportunities to improve care for very elderly kidney transplant recipients.</p>","PeriodicalId":33349,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/85/b1/bmjsit-2022-000137.PMC9944353.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2022-000137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to identify distinct clusters of very elderly kidney transplant recipients aged ≥80 and assess clinical outcomes among these unique clusters.

Design: Cohort study with machine learning (ML) consensus clustering approach.

Setting and participants: All very elderly (age ≥80 at time of transplant) kidney transplant recipients in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database database from 2010 to 2019.

Main outcome measures: Distinct clusters of very elderly kidney transplant recipients and their post-transplant outcomes including death-censored graft failure, overall mortality and acute allograft rejection among the assigned clusters.

Results: Consensus cluster analysis was performed in 419 very elderly kidney transplant and identified three distinct clusters that best represented the clinical characteristics of very elderly kidney transplant recipients. Recipients in cluster 1 received standard Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) non-extended criteria donor (ECD) kidneys from deceased donors. Recipients in cluster 2 received kidneys from older, hypertensive ECD deceased donors with a KDPI score ≥85%. Kidneys for cluster 2 patients had longer cold ischaemia time and the highest use of machine perfusion. Recipients in clusters 1 and 2 were more likely to be on dialysis at the time of transplant (88.3%, 89.4%). Recipients in cluster 3 were more likely to be preemptive (39%) or had a dialysis duration less than 1 year (24%). These recipients received living donor kidney transplants. Cluster 3 had the most favourable post-transplant outcomes. Compared with cluster 3, cluster 1 had comparable survival but higher death-censored graft failure, while cluster 2 had lower patient survival, higher death-censored graft failure and more acute rejection.

Conclusions: Our study used an unsupervised ML approach to cluster very elderly kidney transplant recipients into three clinically unique clusters with distinct post-transplant outcomes. These findings from an ML clustering approach provide additional understanding towards individualised medicine and opportunities to improve care for very elderly kidney transplant recipients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过机器学习共识聚类分析美国80岁或以上肾移植受者的不同表型。
目的:本研究旨在确定≥80岁高龄肾移植受者的不同群体,并评估这些独特群体的临床结果。设计:采用机器学习(ML)共识聚类方法的队列研究。环境和参与者:2010年至2019年器官获取和移植网络/器官共享联合网络数据库数据库中的所有高龄(移植时年龄≥80岁)肾移植受者。主要结果测量:特高龄肾移植受者的不同群体及其移植后的结果,包括死亡审查的移植物衰竭、总死亡率和指定群体中的急性同种异体移植排斥反应。结果:对419例高龄肾移植患者进行了一致聚类分析,确定了最能代表高龄肾移植受者临床特征的三个不同的聚类。第1组的受赠者接受了已故供者的标准肾供者档案指数(KDPI)非扩展标准供者(ECD)肾脏。第2组接受的肾脏来自KDPI评分≥85%的老年高血压ECD死亡供者。第2组患者的肾脏冷缺血时间较长,机器灌注的使用率最高。第1组和第2组的受者更有可能在移植时进行透析(88.3%,89.4%)。第3组的受者更有可能是先发制人的(39%)或透析持续时间少于1年(24%)。这些接受者接受了活体肾脏移植。第3组移植后预后最好。与第3类相比,第1类患者的生存期相当,但死亡审查的移植物衰竭发生率较高,而第2类患者的生存期较低,死亡审查的移植物衰竭发生率较高,急性排斥反应发生率较高。结论:我们的研究使用无监督ML方法将高龄肾移植受者分为三个临床独特的组,这些组具有不同的移植后预后。这些来自ML聚类方法的发现为个性化医疗提供了额外的理解,并为改善高龄肾移植受者的护理提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
The impact of adjuvant antibiotic hydrogel application on the primary stability of uncemented hip stems. Prospective randomized evaluation of the sustained impact of assistive artificial intelligence on anesthetists' ultrasound scanning for regional anesthesia. Clinical effectiveness of a modified muscle sparing posterior technique compared with a standard lateral approach in hip hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular fractures (HemiSPAIRE): a multicenter, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. IDEAL evaluation for global surgery innovation. No frugal innovation without frugal evaluation: the Global IDEAL Sub-Framework.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1