Prevalence, etiology, and characteristics of patients with type-2 acute myocardial infarction

Marcia Moura Schmidt, Alexandre Schaan de Quadros, Eduarda Schütz Martinelli, Carlos Antonio Mascia Gottschall
{"title":"Prevalence, etiology, and characteristics of patients with type-2 acute myocardial infarction","authors":"Marcia Moura Schmidt,&nbsp;Alexandre Schaan de Quadros,&nbsp;Eduarda Schütz Martinelli,&nbsp;Carlos Antonio Mascia Gottschall","doi":"10.1016/j.rbciev.2015.12.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In clinical practice, type-1 (coronary thrombosis) and type-2 (imbalance between oxygen demand and supply) acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are not clearly differentiated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and etiology of type-2 AMI and compare its profile with that of type-1 AMI.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients admitted with ST-segment elevation AMI (STEMI)<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->12<!--> <!-->hours of symptom onset, and referred for coronary angiography, from 2009 to 2013, were analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 1,960 patients included; 1,817 were analyzed, of whom 1,786 (98.3%) had type-1 AMI, and 31 (1.7%), type-2. All patients with type-2 AMI showed no significant coronary lesions, and 36% of the cases had apical dyskinesia. Type-2 AMI patients had, in general, a clinical and laboratory profile that was similar to those with type-1, except for the younger age, lower levels of myocardial necrosis markers, higher probability of having pre-TIMI 3 flow and higher left ventricular ejection fraction. At 30 days, mortality (3.2 vs. 9.0%; <em>p</em> <em>=</em> <!-->0.23) and the occurrence of death, reinfarction, or need for target-vessel revascularization (3.2 vs. 13.0%; <em>p</em> <em>=</em> <!-->0.09) were numerically lower in type-2 AMI.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Few patients with STEMI were classified as type-2; they had structural abnormalities, isolated or associated with the absence of significant lesions; showed little difference regarding the clinical and laboratory profile, and similar clinical outcomes at 30 days, when compared to patients with type-1 AMI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101094,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Cardiologia Invasiva (English Edition)","volume":"23 2","pages":"Pages 119-123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbciev.2015.12.010","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Cardiologia Invasiva (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214123515000368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background

In clinical practice, type-1 (coronary thrombosis) and type-2 (imbalance between oxygen demand and supply) acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are not clearly differentiated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and etiology of type-2 AMI and compare its profile with that of type-1 AMI.

Methods

Patients admitted with ST-segment elevation AMI (STEMI) < 12 hours of symptom onset, and referred for coronary angiography, from 2009 to 2013, were analyzed.

Results

There were 1,960 patients included; 1,817 were analyzed, of whom 1,786 (98.3%) had type-1 AMI, and 31 (1.7%), type-2. All patients with type-2 AMI showed no significant coronary lesions, and 36% of the cases had apical dyskinesia. Type-2 AMI patients had, in general, a clinical and laboratory profile that was similar to those with type-1, except for the younger age, lower levels of myocardial necrosis markers, higher probability of having pre-TIMI 3 flow and higher left ventricular ejection fraction. At 30 days, mortality (3.2 vs. 9.0%; p = 0.23) and the occurrence of death, reinfarction, or need for target-vessel revascularization (3.2 vs. 13.0%; p = 0.09) were numerically lower in type-2 AMI.

Conclusions

Few patients with STEMI were classified as type-2; they had structural abnormalities, isolated or associated with the absence of significant lesions; showed little difference regarding the clinical and laboratory profile, and similar clinical outcomes at 30 days, when compared to patients with type-1 AMI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2型急性心肌梗死患者的患病率、病因和特征
背景在临床实践中,1型(冠状动脉血栓形成)和2型(供氧量失衡)急性心肌梗死(AMI)并没有明确的区分。本研究的目的是评估2型AMI的患病率和病因,并将其与1型AMI进行比较。方法st段抬高AMI (STEMI) <患者;分析2009 - 2013年12小时出现症状并进行冠状动脉造影的患者。结果共纳入1960例患者;分析了1817例,其中1786例(98.3%)为1型AMI, 31例(1.7%)为2型AMI。所有2型AMI患者均未出现明显的冠状动脉病变,36%的患者有尖顶运动障碍。一般来说,2型AMI患者的临床和实验室特征与1型AMI患者相似,除了年龄更年轻,心肌坏死标志物水平更低,timi前3血流的可能性更高,左室射血分数更高。30 d时,死亡率(3.2% vs. 9.0%;P = 0.23)和死亡、再梗死或需要靶血管重建术的发生率(3.2% vs. 13.0%;p = 0.09), 2型AMI患者数值较低。结论STEMI患者中2型患者较少;他们有结构异常,孤立的或与没有显著病变相关;与1型AMI患者相比,在临床和实验室概况方面差异不大,30天的临床结果相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Primary or rescue percutaneous coronary intervention in smokers Right heart catheterization through ultrasound-guided antecubital vein approach Transition between ticagrelor and two different doses of clopidogrel at hospital discharge in patients with acute coronary syndrome submitted to percutaneous coronary intervention Rare form of coronary fistula draining into the right ventricular apex Evaluation of scattered radiation and impact of local protective devices in an interventional cardiology laboratory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1