Agreement of Step-Based Metrics From ActiGraph and ActivPAL Accelerometers Worn Concurrently Among Older Adults.

Eric T Hyde, Steve Nguyen, Fatima Tuz-Zahra, Christopher C Moore, Mikael Anne Greenwood-Hickman, Rod L Walker, Loki Natarajan, Dori Rosenberg, John Bellettiere
{"title":"Agreement of Step-Based Metrics From ActiGraph and ActivPAL Accelerometers Worn Concurrently Among Older Adults.","authors":"Eric T Hyde, Steve Nguyen, Fatima Tuz-Zahra, Christopher C Moore, Mikael Anne Greenwood-Hickman, Rod L Walker, Loki Natarajan, Dori Rosenberg, John Bellettiere","doi":"10.1123/jmpb.2022-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Our study evaluated the agreement of mean daily step counts, peak 1-min cadence, and peak 30-min cadence between the hip-worn ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometer, using the normal filter (AG<sub>N</sub>) and the low frequency extension (AG<sub>LFE</sub>), and the thigh-worn activPAL3 micro (AP) accelerometer among older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine-hundred and fifty-three older adults (≥65 years) were recruited to wear the ActiGraph device concurrently with the AP for 4-7 days beginning in 2016. Using the AP as the reference measure, device agreement for each step-based metric was assessed using mean differences (AG<sub>N</sub> - AP and AG<sub>LFE</sub> - AP), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and Pearson and concordance correlation coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For AG<sub>N</sub> - AP, the mean differences and MAPE were: daily steps -1,851 steps/day and 27.2%, peak 1-min cadence -16.2 steps/min and 16.3%, and peak 30-min cadence -17.7 steps/min and 24.0%. Pearson coefficients were .94, .85, and .91 and concordance coefficients were .81, .65, and .73, respectively. For AG<sub>LFE</sub> - AP, the mean differences and MAPE were: daily steps 4,968 steps/day and 72.7%, peak 1-min cadence -1.4 steps/min and 4.7%, and peak 30-min cadence 1.4 steps/min and 7.0%. Pearson coefficients were .91, .91, and .95 and concordance coefficients were .49, .91, and .94, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with estimates from the AP, the AG<sub>N</sub> underestimated daily step counts by approximately 1,800 steps/day, while the AG<sub>LFE</sub> overestimated by approximately 5,000 steps/day. However, peak step cadence estimates generated from the AG<sub>LFE</sub> and AP had high agreement (MAPE ≤ 7.0%). Additional convergent validation studies of step-based metrics from concurrently worn accelerometers are needed for improved understanding of between-device agreement.</p>","PeriodicalId":73572,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the measurement of physical behaviour","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9934009/pdf/nihms-1870840.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for the measurement of physical behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jmpb.2022-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Our study evaluated the agreement of mean daily step counts, peak 1-min cadence, and peak 30-min cadence between the hip-worn ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometer, using the normal filter (AGN) and the low frequency extension (AGLFE), and the thigh-worn activPAL3 micro (AP) accelerometer among older adults.

Methods: Nine-hundred and fifty-three older adults (≥65 years) were recruited to wear the ActiGraph device concurrently with the AP for 4-7 days beginning in 2016. Using the AP as the reference measure, device agreement for each step-based metric was assessed using mean differences (AGN - AP and AGLFE - AP), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and Pearson and concordance correlation coefficients.

Results: For AGN - AP, the mean differences and MAPE were: daily steps -1,851 steps/day and 27.2%, peak 1-min cadence -16.2 steps/min and 16.3%, and peak 30-min cadence -17.7 steps/min and 24.0%. Pearson coefficients were .94, .85, and .91 and concordance coefficients were .81, .65, and .73, respectively. For AGLFE - AP, the mean differences and MAPE were: daily steps 4,968 steps/day and 72.7%, peak 1-min cadence -1.4 steps/min and 4.7%, and peak 30-min cadence 1.4 steps/min and 7.0%. Pearson coefficients were .91, .91, and .95 and concordance coefficients were .49, .91, and .94, respectively.

Conclusions: Compared with estimates from the AP, the AGN underestimated daily step counts by approximately 1,800 steps/day, while the AGLFE overestimated by approximately 5,000 steps/day. However, peak step cadence estimates generated from the AGLFE and AP had high agreement (MAPE ≤ 7.0%). Additional convergent validation studies of step-based metrics from concurrently worn accelerometers are needed for improved understanding of between-device agreement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同时佩戴 ActiGraph 和 ActivPAL 加速计的老年人步数指标的一致性。
目的:我们的研究评估了使用正常滤波器(AGN)和低频扩展(AGLFE)的髋部佩戴式 ActiGraph GT3X+ 加速度计与大腿佩戴式 activPAL3 micro(AP)加速度计之间在日平均步数、1 分钟峰值步频和 30 分钟峰值步频方面的一致性:从 2016 年开始,招募了 953 名老年人(≥65 岁)同时佩戴 ActiGraph 设备和 AP 4-7 天。以AP为参照测量,使用平均差(AGN - AP和AGLFE - AP)、平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)、皮尔逊相关系数(Pearson)和一致性相关系数(conordance correlation coefficients)评估了每个基于步长的指标的设备一致性:对于 AGN - AP,平均差异和 MAPE 分别为:日步数 -1,851 步/天和 27.2%,1 分钟步速峰值 -16.2 步/分钟和 16.3%,30 分钟步速峰值 -17.7 步/分钟和 24.0%。皮尔逊系数分别为 0.94、0.85 和 0.91,一致性系数分别为 0.81、0.65 和 0.73。对于 AGLFE - AP,平均差异和 MAPE 分别为:日步数 4,968 步/天和 72.7%,1 分钟步速峰值 -1.4 步/分钟和 4.7%,30 分钟步速峰值 1.4 步/分钟和 7.0%。皮尔逊系数分别为.91、.91和.95,一致性系数分别为.49、.91和.94:与 AP 的估计值相比,AGN 低估了每日步数约 1,800 步/天,而 AGLFE 则高估了约 5,000 步/天。不过,AGLFE 和 AP 得出的峰值步速估计值具有很高的一致性(MAPE ≤ 7.0%)。为了更好地了解设备间的一致性,还需要对同时佩戴的加速度计所产生的基于步速的指标进行更多的趋同验证研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of Accelerometer Calibration on the Estimation of Objectively Measured Physical Activity: The Tromsø Study Criterion Validity of Accelerometers in Determining Knee-Flexion Angles During Sitting in a Laboratory Setting Comparability of 24-hr Activity Cycle Outputs From ActiGraph Counts Generated in ActiLife and RStudio Comparison of Sleep and Physical Activity Metrics From Wrist-Worn ActiGraph wGT3X-BT and GT9X Accelerometers During Free-Living in Adults Pre- Versus Postmeal Sedentary Duration—Impact on Postprandial Glucose in Older Adults With Overweight or Obesity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1