COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy for children: A pilot assessment of parents in the United States.

IF 2.4 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health Promotion Perspectives Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.34172/hpp.2022.51
Kavita Batra, Manoj Sharma, Chia-Liang Dai, Ravi Batra, Jagdish Khubchandani
{"title":"COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy for children: A pilot assessment of parents in the United States.","authors":"Kavita Batra,&nbsp;Manoj Sharma,&nbsp;Chia-Liang Dai,&nbsp;Ravi Batra,&nbsp;Jagdish Khubchandani","doi":"10.34172/hpp.2022.51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine hesitancy has remained a significant concern among adults worldwide. However, not much is known about parental vaccine hesitancy for getting children vaccinated for COVID-19 in the U.S. Thus, the purpose of this study was to conduct a national assessment of parents' preferences for COVID-19 vaccination of children using the evidence-based Multi-Theory Model (MTM) and explore the predictors of vaccine hesitancy. <b>Methods:</b> To participate in this study, a national random sample of parents (n=263) took a valid and reliable online questionnaire based on the MTM. Independent samples <i>t</i> test, chi-square test, multiple logistic regression was utilized to analyze data. <b>Results:</b> More than two-fifths (42%) of the participating parents were not willing to get their children vaccinated for COVID-19. Parental vaccination status, booster dose acceptance, education, and political affiliation were significant predictors of willingness to get children vaccinated for COVID-19. In the multiple logistic regression analyses, behavioral confidence and participatory dialogue (i.e., perceived advantages versus disadvantages) were statistically significant predictors of COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy for children among the participating parents. <b>Conclusion:</b> Given the multiple factors that were found influential in parental hesitancy for COVID-19 vaccination among children, multimodal and evidence-based interventions are needed to increase the uptake of COVID-19 vaccines among children by influencing the parents' perceptions, increasing their confidence, dispelling misinformation, and reducing constraints for vaccination. Such interventions should emphasize communication and messaging that is truthful, interactive, scientifically correct, and to be delivered in a variety of community-based settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":46588,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Perspectives","volume":"12 4","pages":"391-398"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9958230/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/hpp.2022.51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine hesitancy has remained a significant concern among adults worldwide. However, not much is known about parental vaccine hesitancy for getting children vaccinated for COVID-19 in the U.S. Thus, the purpose of this study was to conduct a national assessment of parents' preferences for COVID-19 vaccination of children using the evidence-based Multi-Theory Model (MTM) and explore the predictors of vaccine hesitancy. Methods: To participate in this study, a national random sample of parents (n=263) took a valid and reliable online questionnaire based on the MTM. Independent samples t test, chi-square test, multiple logistic regression was utilized to analyze data. Results: More than two-fifths (42%) of the participating parents were not willing to get their children vaccinated for COVID-19. Parental vaccination status, booster dose acceptance, education, and political affiliation were significant predictors of willingness to get children vaccinated for COVID-19. In the multiple logistic regression analyses, behavioral confidence and participatory dialogue (i.e., perceived advantages versus disadvantages) were statistically significant predictors of COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy for children among the participating parents. Conclusion: Given the multiple factors that were found influential in parental hesitancy for COVID-19 vaccination among children, multimodal and evidence-based interventions are needed to increase the uptake of COVID-19 vaccines among children by influencing the parents' perceptions, increasing their confidence, dispelling misinformation, and reducing constraints for vaccination. Such interventions should emphasize communication and messaging that is truthful, interactive, scientifically correct, and to be delivered in a variety of community-based settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童COVID-19疫苗接种犹豫:对美国父母的试点评估
背景:2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫苗犹豫仍然是全球成年人关注的一个重大问题。然而,在美国,父母对儿童接种COVID-19疫苗的犹豫性知之甚少。因此,本研究的目的是利用基于证据的多理论模型(MTM)对父母对儿童接种COVID-19疫苗的偏好进行全国性评估,并探索疫苗犹豫的预测因素。方法:采用基于MTM的有效、可靠的在线问卷,在全国随机抽取263名家长参与本研究。采用独立样本t检验、卡方检验、多元logistic回归对数据进行分析。结果:超过五分之二(42%)的参与调查的父母不愿意让孩子接种COVID-19疫苗。父母的疫苗接种状况、加强剂接受程度、教育程度和政治派别是儿童接种COVID-19疫苗意愿的重要预测因素。在多元逻辑回归分析中,行为信心和参与性对话(即感知优势与劣势)是参与父母中儿童COVID-19疫苗接种犹豫的统计显著预测因素。结论:考虑到影响父母对儿童COVID-19疫苗接种犹豫不决的多种因素,需要采取多模式和循证干预措施,通过影响父母的认知、增强父母的信心、消除错误信息和减少疫苗接种的制约因素,提高儿童COVID-19疫苗的接种率。这种干预措施应强调真实、互动、科学正确的交流和信息传递,并在各种社区环境中提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Promotion Perspectives
Health Promotion Perspectives PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.30%
发文量
27
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
A systematic review of the impact of therapeutic education programs on the quality of life of people with Multiple Sclerosis. Childhood maltreatment and vulnerability to substance use disorders: The mediating role of psychological security. Corrigendum to: Examining associations between smartphone use, smartphone addiction, and mental health outcomes: a cross-sectional study of college students Kil N, Kim J, McDaniel JT, Kim J, Kensinger K. Health Promot Perspect. 2021;11(1):36-44. doi: 10.34172/hpp.2021.06. Corrigendum to: Prevalence and incidence of type 1 diabetes in the world: a systematic review and meta-analysis Mobasseri M, Shirmohammadi M, Amiri T, Vahed N, Hosseini Fard H, Ghojazadeh M. Health Promot Perspect. 2020 Mar 30;10(2):98-115. doi: 10.34172/hpp.2020.18. Development of a new equation and validation of earlier resting energy expenditure predicting equations in adults living in Tehran.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1