From the BFI-44 to BFI-20: Psychometric Properties of the Short Form of the Big Five Inventory.

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychological Reports Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-02 DOI:10.1177/00332941231161754
Lana Tucaković, Boban Nedeljković
{"title":"From the BFI-44 to BFI-20: Psychometric Properties of the Short Form of the Big Five Inventory.","authors":"Lana Tucaković, Boban Nedeljković","doi":"10.1177/00332941231161754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Big Five Inventory (BFI-44) has been a useful tool for researchers for over three decades. However, the contemporary way of life has created the need for abbreviated versions of psychological instruments. We derived the number of items from the BFI-44 questionnaire in order to create a short form of the questionnaire (BFI-20). In the first study (<i>N</i> = 1350, 82.4% females, aged 18-60), using a range of criteria, we identified 20 items (four for each of the Big Five traits) that most optimally represent each dimension. The five-factor structure was mostly replicated in the second (<i>N</i> = 215, 65.1% females, aged 18-65) and third study (<i>N</i> = 263, 83.7% females, aged 18-42). The BFI-20 demonstrated satisfactory reliability, representativeness, homogeneity, and part-whole convergence. Despite mild attenuation, most BFI-20 correlations with schizotypy, satisfaction with life, and positive orientation remained in the same range compared to the BFI-44. The Agreeableness domain was shown to be the most challenging for capturing with four items. We discuss the advantages of our BFI-20 compared to the other two 20-item versions. In sum, we can recommend the use of this BFI-20 version as a time-efficient, satisfactory reliable, and representative questionnaire.</p>","PeriodicalId":21149,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Reports","volume":" ","pages":"1230-1247"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941231161754","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Big Five Inventory (BFI-44) has been a useful tool for researchers for over three decades. However, the contemporary way of life has created the need for abbreviated versions of psychological instruments. We derived the number of items from the BFI-44 questionnaire in order to create a short form of the questionnaire (BFI-20). In the first study (N = 1350, 82.4% females, aged 18-60), using a range of criteria, we identified 20 items (four for each of the Big Five traits) that most optimally represent each dimension. The five-factor structure was mostly replicated in the second (N = 215, 65.1% females, aged 18-65) and third study (N = 263, 83.7% females, aged 18-42). The BFI-20 demonstrated satisfactory reliability, representativeness, homogeneity, and part-whole convergence. Despite mild attenuation, most BFI-20 correlations with schizotypy, satisfaction with life, and positive orientation remained in the same range compared to the BFI-44. The Agreeableness domain was shown to be the most challenging for capturing with four items. We discuss the advantages of our BFI-20 compared to the other two 20-item versions. In sum, we can recommend the use of this BFI-20 version as a time-efficient, satisfactory reliable, and representative questionnaire.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从 BFI-44 到 BFI-20:从BFI-44到BFI-20:大五量表简表的心理测量学特性。
三十多年来,大五量表(BFI-44)一直是研究人员的有用工具。然而,现代生活方式需要简短版本的心理工具。我们从 BFI-44 问卷中推导出项目数量,从而制作出简短版问卷(BFI-20)。在第一项研究中(N = 1350,82.4% 为女性,年龄在 18-60 岁之间),我们使用了一系列标准,确定了最能代表每个维度的 20 个项目(五大特质各四个)。五因素结构在第二次研究(样本数 = 215,65.1% 为女性,年龄在 18-65 岁之间)和第三次研究(样本数 = 263,83.7% 为女性,年龄在 18-42 岁之间)中得到了大部分复制。BFI-20 显示出令人满意的可靠性、代表性、同质性和部分-整体趋同性。尽管有轻微的衰减,但与 BFI-44 相比,BFI-20 与精神分裂症、生活满意度和积极取向的大部分相关性仍保持在相同的范围内。结果表明,"合意 "领域的四个项目是最难捕捉的。我们讨论了 BFI-20 与其他两个 20 个项目版本相比的优势。总之,我们推荐使用此 BFI-20 版本,它是一种省时、令人满意的可靠且具有代表性的问卷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Reports
Psychological Reports PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
171
期刊最新文献
Recollection of Bullshit Work Episodes (vs. Meaningful or Neutral Ones) Relates to Negative Affect, Deviant Work Behavior and Turnover Intentions. The Relationship Between Attitudes Toward Suicide and Suicidal Ideation and Attempts Among Chinese College Students: The Mediating Role of Depression. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Correlation Coefficients Between Fear of Missing Out and Sleep Health Dimensions. The Self-Compassionate Path to Self-Forgiveness: Self-Kindness Enhances and Isolation Inhibits. Can Peripheral Group Members Not Represent the In-Group? The Effect of Member Prototypicality on Intergroup Conflict.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1