NGO–academia research co-production in humanitarian settings: opportunities and challenges

IF 2.6 3区 管理学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Disasters Pub Date : 2022-07-16 DOI:10.1111/disa.12556
Michelle Lokot, Caitlin Wake
{"title":"NGO–academia research co-production in humanitarian settings: opportunities and challenges","authors":"Michelle Lokot,&nbsp;Caitlin Wake","doi":"10.1111/disa.12556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The term ‘co-production’ is increasingly used to describe varied forms of research partnerships, expanding from its application within the health sector to other areas. In humanitarian settings, alongside more calls for localisation and decolonising aid, research co-production is emerging as a means of tackling power dynamics within NGO (non-governmental organisation)–academia research partnerships. Based on semi-structured interviews with practitioners and academics with experience of co-producing research and participating in research partnerships, this paper presents the opportunities and challenges associated with co-producing research in humanitarian settings. The findings suggest that similar to other buzzwords in the humanitarian sector, the label of ‘co-production’ is sometimes uncritically applied to any kind of research partnership. The study emphasises the importance of centring power within co-produced research in humanitarian settings and suggests that while the term co-production is sometimes misappropriated, the principles underlying this concept remain essential to unravelling power hierarchies within the humanitarian sector.</p>","PeriodicalId":48088,"journal":{"name":"Disasters","volume":"47 2","pages":"464-481"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/disa.12556","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disasters","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/disa.12556","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The term ‘co-production’ is increasingly used to describe varied forms of research partnerships, expanding from its application within the health sector to other areas. In humanitarian settings, alongside more calls for localisation and decolonising aid, research co-production is emerging as a means of tackling power dynamics within NGO (non-governmental organisation)–academia research partnerships. Based on semi-structured interviews with practitioners and academics with experience of co-producing research and participating in research partnerships, this paper presents the opportunities and challenges associated with co-producing research in humanitarian settings. The findings suggest that similar to other buzzwords in the humanitarian sector, the label of ‘co-production’ is sometimes uncritically applied to any kind of research partnership. The study emphasises the importance of centring power within co-produced research in humanitarian settings and suggests that while the term co-production is sometimes misappropriated, the principles underlying this concept remain essential to unravelling power hierarchies within the humanitarian sector.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人道主义环境下非政府组织-学术界研究合作生产:机遇与挑战
“合作生产”一词越来越多地用于描述各种形式的研究伙伴关系,其应用范围从卫生部门扩大到其他领域。在人道主义环境中,除了更多地呼吁本地化和非殖民化援助之外,研究合作生产正在成为解决非政府组织(非政府组织)-学术界研究伙伴关系内部权力动态的一种手段。基于对具有合作研究经验和参与研究伙伴关系的从业人员和学者的半结构化访谈,本文提出了与人道主义环境下的合作研究相关的机遇和挑战。研究结果表明,与人道主义领域的其他流行语类似,“合作生产”的标签有时被不加批判地应用于任何类型的研究伙伴关系。该研究强调了在人道主义背景下联合生产研究中集中权力的重要性,并表明尽管联合生产一词有时被滥用,但这一概念背后的原则对于解开人道主义部门的权力等级仍然至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Disasters
Disasters Multiple-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.10%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Disasters is a major, peer-reviewed quarterly journal reporting on all aspects of disaster studies, policy and management. It provides a forum for academics, policymakers and practitioners to publish high-quality research and practice concerning natural catastrophes, anthropogenic disasters, complex political emergencies and protracted crises around the world. The journal promotes the interchange of ideas and experience, maintaining a balance between field reports, case study articles of general interest and academic papers. Disasters: Is the leading journal in the field of disasters, protracted crises and complex emergencies Influences disaster prevention, mitigation and response policies and practices Adopts a world-wide geographical perspective Contains a mix of academic papers and field studies Promotes the interchange of ideas between practitioners, policy-makers and academics.
期刊最新文献
The ‘vulnerability paradox’: how institutional legacies shaped Colombia's response to Venezuelan displacement From conflict to collaboration: how local natural resource management conventions foster peacebuilding between farmers and herders in central Mali Entwined economies of violence: understanding borderland conflict and resource politics in northern Kenya Locally-led maladaptation as a configuration of responsibilities: ethnographic photo essay of a bamboo wall in Bangladesh Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1