[Characteristics of Adverse events of Dietary Supplements Provided byMedical Professionals and their Application in Causality Evaluation Algorithm].

IF 0.2 4区 农林科学 Q4 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Hygiene and Safety Science Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3358/shokueishi.64.13
Keizo Umegaki, Hirotomo Nakamura, Hiroshi Yamada
{"title":"[Characteristics of Adverse events of Dietary Supplements Provided byMedical Professionals and their Application in Causality Evaluation Algorithm].","authors":"Keizo Umegaki,&nbsp;Hirotomo Nakamura,&nbsp;Hiroshi Yamada","doi":"10.3358/shokueishi.64.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to characterize the adverse events of dietary supplements provided by medical professionals and to examine whether there are challenges when applying each case to the causality evaluation algorithm. Data from 290 individual cases collected by the Tokyo Metropolitan Government in cooperation with the Tokyo Medical Association and Tokyo Pharmaceutical Association were analyzed. The causality evaluation algorithm that was used in this study was reported previously. Female patients accounted for 73% of those who experienced adverse events. Both male and female patients who had adverse events were in their 60s and 70s. Many of the participants had underlying diseases and aimed to improve their medical conditions. Furthermore, skin symptoms were the most common. Many of the supplements were made from natural substances, with an average of 7.7 ingredients in each product. More than half of the products were used for less than one month. In most cases, symptoms improved after discontinuation of the products or after the administration of medications. When each event was applied to the causality assessment algorithm, it was necessary to understand the information as follows: in cases of product discontinuation with simultaneous medications recovery was not concluding the product discontinuation, and the physician's judgement should be place as objective evidence. The algorithm was successfully applicable to cases provided by medical professionals and the evaluated results for all cases were 30% possible and 62% highly possible. The evaluated results indicate the relationship between products/ingredients and the symptom, and by adding information on the symptom and its severity, it is possible to clarify the phenomenon to be noted.</p>","PeriodicalId":54373,"journal":{"name":"Food Hygiene and Safety Science","volume":"64 1","pages":"13-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Hygiene and Safety Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3358/shokueishi.64.13","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to characterize the adverse events of dietary supplements provided by medical professionals and to examine whether there are challenges when applying each case to the causality evaluation algorithm. Data from 290 individual cases collected by the Tokyo Metropolitan Government in cooperation with the Tokyo Medical Association and Tokyo Pharmaceutical Association were analyzed. The causality evaluation algorithm that was used in this study was reported previously. Female patients accounted for 73% of those who experienced adverse events. Both male and female patients who had adverse events were in their 60s and 70s. Many of the participants had underlying diseases and aimed to improve their medical conditions. Furthermore, skin symptoms were the most common. Many of the supplements were made from natural substances, with an average of 7.7 ingredients in each product. More than half of the products were used for less than one month. In most cases, symptoms improved after discontinuation of the products or after the administration of medications. When each event was applied to the causality assessment algorithm, it was necessary to understand the information as follows: in cases of product discontinuation with simultaneous medications recovery was not concluding the product discontinuation, and the physician's judgement should be place as objective evidence. The algorithm was successfully applicable to cases provided by medical professionals and the evaluated results for all cases were 30% possible and 62% highly possible. The evaluated results indicate the relationship between products/ingredients and the symptom, and by adding information on the symptom and its severity, it is possible to clarify the phenomenon to be noted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学专业人员提供的膳食补充剂不良事件特征及其在因果评价算法中的应用
本研究旨在描述由医疗专业人员提供的膳食补充剂的不良事件,并检查在将每个案例应用于因果关系评估算法时是否存在挑战。对东京都政府与东京医学协会和东京医药协会合作收集的290个个案的数据进行了分析。本研究中使用的因果关系评价算法已在之前报道过。女性患者占出现不良事件的患者的73%。出现不良事件的男性和女性患者年龄均在六七十岁。许多参与者有潜在的疾病,他们的目标是改善他们的医疗条件。此外,皮肤症状最为常见。许多补品都是由天然物质制成的,每种产品平均含有7.7种成分。超过一半的产品使用时间不到一个月。在大多数情况下,停药或服药后症状得到改善。当将每个事件应用于因果关系评估算法时,有必要了解以下信息:在产品停药同时药物恢复的情况下,不确定产品停药,医生的判断应作为客观证据。该算法成功应用于医疗专业人员提供的病例,所有病例的评估结果均为30%可能和62%高度可能。评估结果表明产品/成分与症状之间的关系,并且通过添加有关症状及其严重程度的信息,可以澄清需要注意的现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Hygiene and Safety Science
Food Hygiene and Safety Science Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
[Analytical Method for Melengestrol Acetate in Livestock Products Using LC-MS/MS]. [Establishment of Rapid Simultaneous Analysis Method for Plant Toxins by LC-TOF-MS]. [Implementation and Evaluation of Risk Communication Regarding Residual Pesticides]. [Improved Indophenol Titration Method for Ascorbic Acid Using a Dropper and Electronic Balance: Enhanced Convenience and Efficiency]. [Comparison of DNA Extraction Methods for Processed Foods Containing Soybean or Maize].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1