Global Comparison of Nutrient Reference Values, Current Intakes, and Intake Assessment Methods for Sodium among the Adult Population.

Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3177/jnsv.69.38
Emiko Koshida, Ryoko Tajima, Mai Matsumoto, Hidemi Takimoto
{"title":"Global Comparison of Nutrient Reference Values, Current Intakes, and Intake Assessment Methods for Sodium among the Adult Population.","authors":"Emiko Koshida,&nbsp;Ryoko Tajima,&nbsp;Mai Matsumoto,&nbsp;Hidemi Takimoto","doi":"10.3177/jnsv.69.38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Excess sodium intake is a risk factor for non-communicable diseases (NCDs), such as cardiovascular diseases and hypertension. Therefore, many countries have set nutrient reference values for sodium, specifically for the prevention of NCDs, and intake is routinely monitored by nutrition surveys. In this review, we aimed to compare the global nutrient reference values and national intakes of sodium, along with the methods of intake assessment used. Data were obtained for Australia, Canada, Ireland, Japan, the UK, the US, and the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), where information was accessible online in English or Japanese. We collected the following information regarding sodium intake: the term used for reference values to prevent NCDs; year when reference values were established or revised; reference values to prevent NCDs; target NCDs; designation of nutrition survey; method for estimating intake; and average intake. The reference values ranged from 2,000 mg (Australia and EFSA) to 2,953 mg (Japan). Sodium intake ranged from 2,431 mg (Australia) to 3,958 mg (Japan). Out of seven countries/institutions, five used dietary assessment, and two used sodium urinary excretion for estimating dietary sodium intake. Among the dietary assessment methods, the 24-h dietary recall was most frequently used. National sodium intake exceeded the reference values in all countries, and reduction of sodium intake remains a global challenge.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3177/jnsv.69.38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Excess sodium intake is a risk factor for non-communicable diseases (NCDs), such as cardiovascular diseases and hypertension. Therefore, many countries have set nutrient reference values for sodium, specifically for the prevention of NCDs, and intake is routinely monitored by nutrition surveys. In this review, we aimed to compare the global nutrient reference values and national intakes of sodium, along with the methods of intake assessment used. Data were obtained for Australia, Canada, Ireland, Japan, the UK, the US, and the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), where information was accessible online in English or Japanese. We collected the following information regarding sodium intake: the term used for reference values to prevent NCDs; year when reference values were established or revised; reference values to prevent NCDs; target NCDs; designation of nutrition survey; method for estimating intake; and average intake. The reference values ranged from 2,000 mg (Australia and EFSA) to 2,953 mg (Japan). Sodium intake ranged from 2,431 mg (Australia) to 3,958 mg (Japan). Out of seven countries/institutions, five used dietary assessment, and two used sodium urinary excretion for estimating dietary sodium intake. Among the dietary assessment methods, the 24-h dietary recall was most frequently used. National sodium intake exceeded the reference values in all countries, and reduction of sodium intake remains a global challenge.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
成人钠的营养参考值、当前摄入量和摄入量评估方法的全球比较。
钠摄入过量是心血管疾病和高血压等非传染性疾病的一个风险因素。因此,许多国家制定了钠的营养参考值,特别是预防非传染性疾病的参考值,并通过营养调查对摄入量进行常规监测。在这篇综述中,我们旨在比较全球营养参考值和国家钠摄入量,以及所使用的摄入量评估方法。获得了澳大利亚、加拿大、爱尔兰、日本、英国、美国和欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)的数据,这些信息可以在网上以英语或日语获取。我们收集了以下关于钠摄入量的信息:用于预防非传染性疾病参考值的术语;确定或修订参考值的年份;预防非传染性疾病的参考值;目标非传染性疾病;营养调查指定;摄入量估算方法;平均摄入量。参考值从2000毫克(澳大利亚和欧洲食品安全局)到2953毫克(日本)不等。钠摄入量从2431毫克(澳大利亚)到3958毫克(日本)不等。在7个国家/机构中,5个使用膳食评估,2个使用尿钠排泄来估计膳食钠摄入量。在膳食评价方法中,以24 h膳食回忆法最为常用。所有国家的钠摄入量都超过了参考值,减少钠摄入量仍然是一项全球性挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1