Staffing transformation following Patient-Centered Medical Home recognition among Health Resources & Services Administration-funded health centers.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Care Management Review Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1097/HMR.0000000000000362
Nadereh Pourat, Connie Lu, Xiao Chen, Weihao Zhou, Brionna Hair, Joshua Bolton, Hank Hoang, Alek Sripipatana
{"title":"Staffing transformation following Patient-Centered Medical Home recognition among Health Resources & Services Administration-funded health centers.","authors":"Nadereh Pourat,&nbsp;Connie Lu,&nbsp;Xiao Chen,&nbsp;Weihao Zhou,&nbsp;Brionna Hair,&nbsp;Joshua Bolton,&nbsp;Hank Hoang,&nbsp;Alek Sripipatana","doi":"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) recognition is designed to promote whole-person team-based and integrated care.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Our goal was to assess changes in staffing infrastructure that promoted team-based and integrated care delivery before and after PCMH recognition in Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA)-funded health centers (HCs).</p><p><strong>Methodology/approach: </strong>We identified changes in staffing 2 years before and 3 years after PCMH recognition using 2010-2019 Uniform Data System data among three cohorts of HCs that received PCMH recognition in 2013 ( n = 346), 2014 ( n = 207), and 2015 ( n = 115). Our outcomes were team-based ratio (full-time equivalent medical and nonmedical providers and staff to one primary care physician) and a multidisciplinary staff ratio (allied medical and nonmedical staff to 1,000 patients). We used mixed-effects Poisson regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The earlier cohorts served fewer complex patients and were larger before PCMH recognition. Three years following recognition, the 2013 and 2014 cohorts had significantly larger team-based ratios, and all three cohorts had significantly larger multidisciplinary staff ratios. Cohorts varied, however, in the type of staff that drove this change. Both ratios increased in the longer term.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study suggests that growth in team-based and multidisciplinary staff ratios in each cohort may have been due to a combination of HCs' perceptions of need for specific services, HRSA funding, and technical assistance opportunities.</p><p><strong>Policy implications: </strong>Further research is needed to understand barriers such as costs of employing a multidisciplinary staff, particularly those that cannot directly bill for services as well as whether such changes lead to practice transformation and improved quality of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":47778,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Management Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000362","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) recognition is designed to promote whole-person team-based and integrated care.

Purpose: Our goal was to assess changes in staffing infrastructure that promoted team-based and integrated care delivery before and after PCMH recognition in Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA)-funded health centers (HCs).

Methodology/approach: We identified changes in staffing 2 years before and 3 years after PCMH recognition using 2010-2019 Uniform Data System data among three cohorts of HCs that received PCMH recognition in 2013 ( n = 346), 2014 ( n = 207), and 2015 ( n = 115). Our outcomes were team-based ratio (full-time equivalent medical and nonmedical providers and staff to one primary care physician) and a multidisciplinary staff ratio (allied medical and nonmedical staff to 1,000 patients). We used mixed-effects Poisson regression models.

Results: The earlier cohorts served fewer complex patients and were larger before PCMH recognition. Three years following recognition, the 2013 and 2014 cohorts had significantly larger team-based ratios, and all three cohorts had significantly larger multidisciplinary staff ratios. Cohorts varied, however, in the type of staff that drove this change. Both ratios increased in the longer term.

Conclusion: Our study suggests that growth in team-based and multidisciplinary staff ratios in each cohort may have been due to a combination of HCs' perceptions of need for specific services, HRSA funding, and technical assistance opportunities.

Policy implications: Further research is needed to understand barriers such as costs of employing a multidisciplinary staff, particularly those that cannot directly bill for services as well as whether such changes lead to practice transformation and improved quality of care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在卫生资源与服务管理局资助的卫生中心中,以患者为中心的医疗之家认可后的人员配置转变。
简介:以病人为中心的医疗之家(PCMH)认可旨在促进全人、团队和综合护理。目的:我们的目标是评估卫生资源与服务管理局(HRSA)资助的卫生中心(hc)在承认PCMH之前和之后,人员配置基础设施的变化,这些变化促进了以团队为基础的综合护理服务。方法/方法:我们使用2010-2019年统一数据系统数据,在2013年(n = 346)、2014年(n = 207)和2015年(n = 115)接受PCMH识别的三个hc队列中,确定了PCMH识别前2年和后3年的人员配备变化。我们的结果是基于团队的比率(全职同等医疗和非医疗提供者和工作人员对一名初级保健医生)和多学科工作人员比率(联合医疗和非医疗人员对1,000名患者)。我们使用混合效应泊松回归模型。结果:早期队列服务的复杂患者较少,在PCMH识别之前较大。认可三年后,2013年和2014年队列的团队比例明显更高,所有三个队列的多学科人员比例都明显更高。然而,推动这一变化的员工类型各不相同。长期来看,这两个比率都有所上升。结论:我们的研究表明,每个队列中基于团队和多学科的工作人员比例的增长可能是由于卫生保健中心对特定服务需求、HRSA资金和技术援助机会的综合认识。政策影响:需要进一步研究以了解诸如雇用多学科工作人员的成本等障碍,特别是那些不能直接为服务收费的人员,以及这种变化是否会导致实践转变和提高护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Care Management Review
Health Care Management Review HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Health Care Management Review (HCMR) disseminates state-of-the-art knowledge about management, leadership, and administration of health care systems, organizations, and agencies. Multidisciplinary and international in scope, articles present completed research relevant to health care management, leadership, and administration, as well report on rigorous evaluations of health care management innovations, or provide a synthesis of prior research that results in evidence-based health care management practice recommendations. Articles are theory-driven and translate findings into implications and recommendations for health care administrators, researchers, and faculty.
期刊最新文献
Health care management and the patient experience. Stanford Network for Advancement and Promotion: The impact of a community building-focused leadership development program on the success of underrepresented groups in academic medicine. Exploring barriers to employee voice among certified nursing assistants: A qualitative study. Good therapeutic connections and patient psychological safety: A qualitative survey study. Validating perceptions with clinical measures: A latent growth curve on the associations between patient experience and hospital-associated infections in Norway over time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1