{"title":"Long-term test-retest reliability of the vestibular/ocular motor screening for concussion in child athletes: A preliminary study.","authors":"Ryan N Moran, Abigail C Bretzin","doi":"10.1080/21622965.2022.2163172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) is a sport-related concussion screening tool that assesses vestibular ocular reflex (VOR) and oculomotor symptom provocation. Long-term test-retest reliability of the VOMS over multiple athletic seasons has not yet been established in a pediatric population. Fifty-one child athletes (females = 28, 54.9%) 8-13 years of age, completed a baseline VOMS assessment at two timepoints, 18 months apart. Cronbach's alpha was used to examine the internal consistency at both time points. Two-way mixed intra-class correlation coefficients and Cohen's Kappa statistics were used to evaluate test-retest reliability. High internal consistency existed at both initial (<i>α</i> = 0.91) and follow-up (<i>α</i> = 0.95) for VOMS symptom provocation items. Strong inter-item correlations were noted between vertical VOR (<i>r</i> = ≥0.70) and visual motion sensitivity (VMS) (<i>r</i> = ≥0.70). Fair agreement was produced for convergence (<i>κ</i> = 0.23, vertical VOR (<i>κ</i> = 0.25) and VMS (<i>κ</i> = 0.25), as well as reliability on NPC distance (ICC<sub>2,</sub><i><sub>k</sub></i> = 0.31). All other VOMS scores yielded poor agreement between time points. Symptom provocation was the same for 49% of athletes between timepoints, while 31.4% had a decrease in scoring at follow-up. Symptom provocation from VOMS tasks lessened with increasing age and time; therefore, clinicians should consider annual baseline testing to improve accuracy for concussion evaluation and management in pediatrics.</p>","PeriodicalId":8047,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","volume":" ","pages":"300-305"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2022.2163172","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) is a sport-related concussion screening tool that assesses vestibular ocular reflex (VOR) and oculomotor symptom provocation. Long-term test-retest reliability of the VOMS over multiple athletic seasons has not yet been established in a pediatric population. Fifty-one child athletes (females = 28, 54.9%) 8-13 years of age, completed a baseline VOMS assessment at two timepoints, 18 months apart. Cronbach's alpha was used to examine the internal consistency at both time points. Two-way mixed intra-class correlation coefficients and Cohen's Kappa statistics were used to evaluate test-retest reliability. High internal consistency existed at both initial (α = 0.91) and follow-up (α = 0.95) for VOMS symptom provocation items. Strong inter-item correlations were noted between vertical VOR (r = ≥0.70) and visual motion sensitivity (VMS) (r = ≥0.70). Fair agreement was produced for convergence (κ = 0.23, vertical VOR (κ = 0.25) and VMS (κ = 0.25), as well as reliability on NPC distance (ICC2,k = 0.31). All other VOMS scores yielded poor agreement between time points. Symptom provocation was the same for 49% of athletes between timepoints, while 31.4% had a decrease in scoring at follow-up. Symptom provocation from VOMS tasks lessened with increasing age and time; therefore, clinicians should consider annual baseline testing to improve accuracy for concussion evaluation and management in pediatrics.
期刊介绍:
Applied Neuropsychology: Child publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in children. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of child patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.