COVID-19 perceived stigma among survivors: A cross-sectional study of prevalence and predictors

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY European Journal of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ejpsy.2022.08.004
Mohamad Alchawa , Sarah Naja , Khaled Ali , Vahe Kehyayan , Peter Michael Haddad , Iheb Bougmiza
{"title":"COVID-19 perceived stigma among survivors: A cross-sectional study of prevalence and predictors","authors":"Mohamad Alchawa ,&nbsp;Sarah Naja ,&nbsp;Khaled Ali ,&nbsp;Vahe Kehyayan ,&nbsp;Peter Michael Haddad ,&nbsp;Iheb Bougmiza","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpsy.2022.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>Perceived stigma related to infectious diseases is of public health importance and can adversely impact patients' physical and mental health. This study aims to identify the level of perceived stigma among COVID-19 survivors in Qatar and investigate its predictors.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An analytical cross-sectional design was employed. Four hundred and four participants who had a positive COVID-19 PCR test were randomly selected from medical records. The selected participants were interviewed to collect sociodemographic and health-related information. Perceived stigma was assessed using the COVID-19 perceived stigma scale-22 (CPSS-22) that was developed by the researchers. A descriptive analysis followed by a bivariate analysis investigated possible associations between the perceived stigma levels and independent variables. A multivariable analysis was performed using logistic regression to identify any significant associations with perceived stigma. The validity and reliability of the developed tool were also tested.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The prevalence of COVID-19 perceived stigma was twenty-six percent (<em>n</em> = 107, 26.4%) at 95% CI [22.4–30.4]. Factors associated with higher COVID-19 perceived stigma were male gender, being a manual worker, non-Arabic ethnicity, low educational level, living alone, and being isolated outside the home. However, only occupation, ethnicity, and low educational level predicted COVID-19 perceived stigma in multivariable analysis. The CPSS-22 showed excellent reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.92).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Perceived stigma was relatively common among participants. Designing programs and interventions targeting male manual workers and those of low-educational levels may assist policymakers in mitigating the stigma related to COVID-19.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12045,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"37 1","pages":"Pages 24-35"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9424513/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213616322000623","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background and objectives

Perceived stigma related to infectious diseases is of public health importance and can adversely impact patients' physical and mental health. This study aims to identify the level of perceived stigma among COVID-19 survivors in Qatar and investigate its predictors.

Methods

An analytical cross-sectional design was employed. Four hundred and four participants who had a positive COVID-19 PCR test were randomly selected from medical records. The selected participants were interviewed to collect sociodemographic and health-related information. Perceived stigma was assessed using the COVID-19 perceived stigma scale-22 (CPSS-22) that was developed by the researchers. A descriptive analysis followed by a bivariate analysis investigated possible associations between the perceived stigma levels and independent variables. A multivariable analysis was performed using logistic regression to identify any significant associations with perceived stigma. The validity and reliability of the developed tool were also tested.

Results

The prevalence of COVID-19 perceived stigma was twenty-six percent (n = 107, 26.4%) at 95% CI [22.4–30.4]. Factors associated with higher COVID-19 perceived stigma were male gender, being a manual worker, non-Arabic ethnicity, low educational level, living alone, and being isolated outside the home. However, only occupation, ethnicity, and low educational level predicted COVID-19 perceived stigma in multivariable analysis. The CPSS-22 showed excellent reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.92).

Conclusion

Perceived stigma was relatively common among participants. Designing programs and interventions targeting male manual workers and those of low-educational levels may assist policymakers in mitigating the stigma related to COVID-19.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
幸存者中新冠肺炎的耻辱感:流行率和预测因素的横断面研究
背景和目的与传染病相关的感知污名具有公共卫生重要性,会对患者的身心健康产生不利影响。本研究旨在确定卡塔尔新冠肺炎幸存者的耻辱感水平,并调查其预测因素。方法采用横断面分析设计。从医疗记录中随机选择了四十四名新冠肺炎PCR检测呈阳性的参与者。对选定的参与者进行了访谈,以收集社会人口统计和健康相关信息。使用研究人员开发的新冠肺炎感知耻辱量表22(CPSS-22)评估感知耻辱。描述性分析和双变量分析调查了感知污名水平和自变量之间的可能关联。使用逻辑回归进行多变量分析,以确定与感知污名的任何显著关联。还测试了所开发工具的有效性和可靠性。结果新冠肺炎感知耻辱感的患病率为26%(n=107,26.4%),置信区间为95%[22.4-304]。与新冠肺炎感知耻辱感较高相关的因素为男性、体力劳动者、非阿拉伯民族、低教育水平、独自生活和在家外隔离。然而,在多变量分析中,只有职业、种族和低教育水平预测了新冠肺炎的耻辱感。CPSS-22显示出良好的可靠性(Cronbachα0.92)。结论感知耻辱在参与者中相对常见。设计针对男性体力劳动者和低教育水平劳动者的方案和干预措施可能有助于政策制定者减轻与新冠肺炎相关的耻辱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: The European journal of psychiatry is a quarterly publication founded in 1986 and directed by Professor Seva until his death in 2004. It was originally intended to report “the scientific activity of European psychiatrists” and “to bring about a greater degree of communication” among them. However, “since scientific knowledge has no geographical or cultural boundaries, is open to contributions from all over the world”. These principles are maintained in the new stage of the journal, now expanded with the help of an American editor.
期刊最新文献
Psychopathological and cardiometabolic efficacy of a nutritional education intervention based on symbiotics in schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Two-arm Randomised Clinical Trial Is it possible to circumnavigate the APIcalypse? On challenges to study mental health in the age of digitalization and AI An expert Delphi consensus for the characteristics of an ideal clozapine-specific side effect scale Psychotherapy training in psychiatry residencies: A review of trainees’ perspectives Exploring direct experience as a core element behind mindfulness-based cognitive therapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1