COVID-19 and Innovation in Medical Library Services: A Scoping Review of Case Studies.

Morteza Amraei, Ehsan Geraei, Mohammadreza Hashemian, Fatemeh Ghassabi, Firoozeh Zare-Farashbandi
{"title":"COVID-19 and Innovation in Medical Library Services: A Scoping Review of Case Studies.","authors":"Morteza Amraei,&nbsp;Ehsan Geraei,&nbsp;Mohammadreza Hashemian,&nbsp;Fatemeh Ghassabi,&nbsp;Firoozeh Zare-Farashbandi","doi":"10.1080/02763869.2023.2160129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The services of medical libraries and information centers has changed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aims to identify the innovative services of medical libraries and information centers during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this scoping review, PubMed, Web of Science (WOS), Scopus, ProQuest, Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts (LISTA) databases were searched to identify case studies and case series. After screening the identified studies, 18 studies were selected. The results showed that the main users of medical libraries and information centers during COVID-19 were health care providers and recipients, researchers, organizational staff, and ordinary library users. Innovative services during the COVID-19 were also provided in these libraries, including distance education services, virtual information services, virtual guidelines, providing information resources, and evidence-based response to treatment teams. To provide these new services, medical libraries used traditional, semi-traditional, and modern information and communication technologies such as telephone, email, online library platforms, e-learning, and social networks. Medical libraries and information centers changed the way they provide services in the face of the COVID-19 crisis. Analyzing the services provided during this period can provide a model for policymakers, and medical librarians and information professionals to improve their services. The information presented here can be used to inform library services during future, similarly critical situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":39720,"journal":{"name":"Medical Reference Services Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Reference Services Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2023.2160129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The services of medical libraries and information centers has changed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aims to identify the innovative services of medical libraries and information centers during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this scoping review, PubMed, Web of Science (WOS), Scopus, ProQuest, Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts (LISTA) databases were searched to identify case studies and case series. After screening the identified studies, 18 studies were selected. The results showed that the main users of medical libraries and information centers during COVID-19 were health care providers and recipients, researchers, organizational staff, and ordinary library users. Innovative services during the COVID-19 were also provided in these libraries, including distance education services, virtual information services, virtual guidelines, providing information resources, and evidence-based response to treatment teams. To provide these new services, medical libraries used traditional, semi-traditional, and modern information and communication technologies such as telephone, email, online library platforms, e-learning, and social networks. Medical libraries and information centers changed the way they provide services in the face of the COVID-19 crisis. Analyzing the services provided during this period can provide a model for policymakers, and medical librarians and information professionals to improve their services. The information presented here can be used to inform library services during future, similarly critical situations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19与医学图书馆服务创新:案例研究的范围审查
由于新冠肺炎疫情,医学图书馆和信息中心的服务发生了变化。本研究旨在探讨新冠肺炎疫情期间医学图书馆信息中心的创新服务。在这篇范围综述中,检索了PubMed、Web of Science (WOS)、Scopus、ProQuest、Library、Information Science & Technology Abstracts (LISTA)数据库,以确定案例研究和案例系列。在筛选确定的研究后,选择了18项研究。结果表明,新冠肺炎疫情期间,医学图书馆信息中心的主要用户为卫生服务提供者和受助者、科研人员、机构工作人员和普通图书馆用户。新冠肺炎疫情期间,图书馆还提供了远程教育服务、虚拟信息服务、虚拟指南、信息资源提供、循证应对等创新服务。为了提供这些新服务,医学图书馆使用了传统、半传统和现代信息和通信技术,如电话、电子邮件、在线图书馆平台、电子学习和社交网络。面对COVID-19危机,医学图书馆和信息中心改变了提供服务的方式。分析这一时期提供的服务可以为政策制定者、医疗图书馆员和信息专业人员提供一个模型,以改善他们的服务。这里提供的信息可用于在未来类似的危急情况下通知图书馆服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Reference Services Quarterly
Medical Reference Services Quarterly Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: This highly acclaimed, peer-reviewed journal is an essential working tool for medical and health sciences librarians. For those professionals who provide reference and public services to health sciences personnel in clinical, educational, or research settings, Medical Reference Services Quarterly covers topics of current interest and practical value in the areas of reference in medicine and related specialties, the biomedical sciences, nursing, and allied health. This exciting and comprehensive resource regularly publishes brief practice-oriented articles relating to medical reference services, with an emphasis on user education, database searching, and electronic information. Two columns feature the Internet and informatics education.
期刊最新文献
Academic Librarian Faculty Status: CLIPP #47 Academic Librarian Faculty Status: CLIPP #47 . Bailey, Edgar and Melissa Becher. Chicago, IL : Association of College and Research Libraries , 2022. 172p. ISBN 9780838936641. $52.00 (softcover) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Science Clips. Integrating Medical Librarians in Evidence-Based Medical Practice in Africa: A Survey of Current Practices and Challenges. Kentucky Public Librarians and Health Information: Experiences, Resource Use, Community Needs, and Roles for Academic Health Sciences Librarians. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Health Sciences Faculty Towards Scholarly Open Access and Predatory Publishing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1