Turkish translation and validation of the Xerostomia Inventory.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 Medicine Archives of rheumatology Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2022.8702
Sezin Yüce Sarı, Melek Tuğce Yılmaz, Ayşenur Elmalı, Levent Kılıç, Deniz Yüce, Gökhan Özyiğit, Mustafa Cengiz, Gözde Yazıcı
{"title":"Turkish translation and validation of the Xerostomia Inventory.","authors":"Sezin Yüce Sarı,&nbsp;Melek Tuğce Yılmaz,&nbsp;Ayşenur Elmalı,&nbsp;Levent Kılıç,&nbsp;Deniz Yüce,&nbsp;Gökhan Özyiğit,&nbsp;Mustafa Cengiz,&nbsp;Gözde Yazıcı","doi":"10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2022.8702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Xerostomia Inventory (XI) was developed to assess the severity of dryness in patients with xerostomia. It has a long and a short form with three- and five-point Guttman-type response options. In this study, we aimed to translate the XI into Turkish, to assess the validity and reliability of both response options in patients with head & neck cancer (HNC) or Sjögren syndrome (SS), and to select the optimal version for Turkish patients.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Between January 2019 and June 2019, the XI was translated into Turkish (XI-T) and applied to patients aged ≥18 years with HNC and SS. All patients were applied two tests including both the three- and five-point options. The internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach alpha and test-retest reliability by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Content validity was based on expert opinion and patient reviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 186 patients (109 males, 77 females; median age: 54 years; range, 19 to 78 years) answered the XI-T. The number of patients with HNC and SS was 143 (77%) and 43 (23%), respectively. Median XI-T score was 17 for the three-point, and 24 for the five-point option, respectively. Overall internal consistency was satisfactory for both options (α=0.81 and α=0.89, respectively). Overall test-retest reliability was satisfactory and ICCs ranged between 0.71 and 0.92 for the three-point, and 0.36 and 0.94 for the five-point option, respectively. Assessments based on expert opinions and patient reviews also favored the content validity of the scale.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The XI-T with both three- and five-point options is a valid and reliable tool to evaluate the presence and severity of dryness in patients with HNC and SS who experience xerostomia. The three-point option is more comprehensible and can be preferred over the five-point option in the Turkish population.</p>","PeriodicalId":8328,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rheumatology","volume":"37 3","pages":"351-360"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4f/72/ArchRheumatol-2022-37-351.PMC9791545.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2022.8702","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objectives: The Xerostomia Inventory (XI) was developed to assess the severity of dryness in patients with xerostomia. It has a long and a short form with three- and five-point Guttman-type response options. In this study, we aimed to translate the XI into Turkish, to assess the validity and reliability of both response options in patients with head & neck cancer (HNC) or Sjögren syndrome (SS), and to select the optimal version for Turkish patients.

Patients and methods: Between January 2019 and June 2019, the XI was translated into Turkish (XI-T) and applied to patients aged ≥18 years with HNC and SS. All patients were applied two tests including both the three- and five-point options. The internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach alpha and test-retest reliability by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Content validity was based on expert opinion and patient reviews.

Results: A total of 186 patients (109 males, 77 females; median age: 54 years; range, 19 to 78 years) answered the XI-T. The number of patients with HNC and SS was 143 (77%) and 43 (23%), respectively. Median XI-T score was 17 for the three-point, and 24 for the five-point option, respectively. Overall internal consistency was satisfactory for both options (α=0.81 and α=0.89, respectively). Overall test-retest reliability was satisfactory and ICCs ranged between 0.71 and 0.92 for the three-point, and 0.36 and 0.94 for the five-point option, respectively. Assessments based on expert opinions and patient reviews also favored the content validity of the scale.

Conclusion: The XI-T with both three- and five-point options is a valid and reliable tool to evaluate the presence and severity of dryness in patients with HNC and SS who experience xerostomia. The three-point option is more comprehensible and can be preferred over the five-point option in the Turkish population.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
口干症清单的土耳其语翻译和验证。
它有长有短,有三点和五点古特曼式的回答选项。内部一致性采用Cronbach alpha评价,重测信度采用类内相关系数(ICCs)评价。内容效度基于专家意见和患者评价。结果:共186例患者,其中男性109例,女性77例;中位年龄:54岁;从19岁到78岁不等)。HNC患者143例(77%),SS患者43例(23%)。两种方案的整体内部一致性均令人满意(分别为α=0.81和α=0.89)。总体测试-重测信度令人满意,三点选项的ICCs范围为0.71 - 0.92,五点选项的ICCs范围为0.36 - 0.94。基于专家意见和患者评价的评估也有利于量表的内容效度。三点方案更容易理解,在土耳其人口中,三点方案比五点方案更可取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of rheumatology
Archives of rheumatology Medicine-Rheumatology
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The Archives of Rheumatology is an official journal of the Turkish League Against Rheumatism (TLAR) and is published quarterly in March, June, September, and December. It publishes original work on all aspects of rheumatology and disorders of the musculoskeletal system. The priority of the Archives of Rheumatology is to publish high-quality original research articles, especially in inflammatory rheumatic disorders. In addition to research articles, brief reports, reviews, editorials, letters to the editor can also be published. It is an independent peer-reviewed international journal printed in English. Manuscripts are refereed by a "double-blind peer-reviewed" process for both referees and authors. Editorial Board of the Archives of Rheumatology works under the principles of The World Association of Medical Editors (WAME), the International Council of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), and Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Pandemic of the century: COVID-19 in inflammatory rheumatic diseases of a national cohort with 3,532 patients Biological treatment in elderly and young patients with ankylosing spondylitis: TURKBIO real-life data results Alarming serum antiprotease levels in axial spondyloarthritis Can serum granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and CCL17 levels be a marker of disease activation in spondyloarthritis? COVID-19 vaccination rates and factors affecting vaccination in children with rheumatic disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1