Connectivity and Order: an Analytical Framework.

IF 1.2 Q1 AREA STUDIES East Asia Pub Date : 2023-02-21 DOI:10.1007/s12140-023-09401-z
Bart Gaens, Ville Sinkkonen, Henri Vogt
{"title":"Connectivity and Order: an Analytical Framework.","authors":"Bart Gaens, Ville Sinkkonen, Henri Vogt","doi":"10.1007/s12140-023-09401-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IR literature has become inundated with different descriptions for the future of international order. The coming age is purportedly marked by China's ascendancy, American decline, a leaderless \"no-one's world\", or multiple competing modernities. Yet the global fight against climate change or shared COVID-19 strategies convey a different image of the world's predicament. The situation appears paradoxical: increasingly tense great-power relations are mixed with ever-strengthening interdependencies. This article contributes to these debates by exploring how global orders as well as regionalism today are increasingly defined by various types of connective functional links between intentional actors at various levels of social organisation. To enable a nuanced analysis, the article introduces an analytical framework composed of six <i>connectivity</i> logics, namely cooperation, copying, cushioning, contestation, containment, and coercion. These play out differently within material, economic, institutional, knowledge, people-to-people, and security spheres. The utility of this article's approach is demonstrated through empirical examples related to the policies of key actors in the Indo-Pacific region.</p>","PeriodicalId":53913,"journal":{"name":"East Asia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9942628/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-023-09401-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IR literature has become inundated with different descriptions for the future of international order. The coming age is purportedly marked by China's ascendancy, American decline, a leaderless "no-one's world", or multiple competing modernities. Yet the global fight against climate change or shared COVID-19 strategies convey a different image of the world's predicament. The situation appears paradoxical: increasingly tense great-power relations are mixed with ever-strengthening interdependencies. This article contributes to these debates by exploring how global orders as well as regionalism today are increasingly defined by various types of connective functional links between intentional actors at various levels of social organisation. To enable a nuanced analysis, the article introduces an analytical framework composed of six connectivity logics, namely cooperation, copying, cushioning, contestation, containment, and coercion. These play out differently within material, economic, institutional, knowledge, people-to-people, and security spheres. The utility of this article's approach is demonstrated through empirical examples related to the policies of key actors in the Indo-Pacific region.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
连通性与秩序:分析框架》。
国际关系文献中充斥着对未来国际秩序的各种描述。据称,未来时代的标志是中国的崛起、美国的衰落、无领导的 "无人世界 "或多种相互竞争的现代性。然而,全球应对气候变化的斗争或共同的 COVID-19 战略却传达了世界困境的另一种形象。情况似乎是矛盾的:日益紧张的大国关系与不断加强的相互依存关系交织在一起。本文探讨了当今的全球秩序和地区主义是如何越来越多地由社会组织各个层面的有意参与者之间的各种类型的连接功能联系所界定的,从而为这些辩论做出了贡献。为了进行细致入微的分析,文章引入了一个由六种连接逻辑组成的分析框架,即合作、复制、缓冲、竞争、遏制和胁迫。这些逻辑在物质、经济、制度、知识、人与人之间以及安全领域中发挥着不同的作用。本文通过与印度洋-太平洋地区主要行动者的政策相关的实证案例,证明了这一方法的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
East Asia
East Asia AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: East Asia, formerly the Journal of Northeast Asian Studies, is the first journal to examine the interplay between politics and culture underlying major developments in China, Japan, Korea, and the Pacific Rim. It is distinguished by a unique, transnational approach to political, economic, and cultural issues. Focusing on the continuing influence these nations exert upon each other, this international quarterly examines the competition, assimilation, and tensions that now shape events in the region, and will for years to come.
期刊最新文献
The CNN Effect and South Korea’s Humanitarian Response to North Korea: A Media-Driven Policy? The Role of Vietnam in Resolving Regional Conflicts in Mainland Southeast Asia in the First Half of the Nineteenth Century Navigating the Persian Gulf Security Complex: Saudi-Iran Rapprochement in an Era of Great Power Competition Singapore’s Indo-Pacific Strategy: A Case of Principled Hedging Exploring Opportunities and Limitations of Kazakhstan’s Multilateral and Bilateral Cooperation in Renewable Energy within Central Asia: A Comprehensive Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1