Improving the visibility and communication of treatment escalation plans in Somerset NHS foundation trust.

Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.3233/JRS-227027
Oliver King, Emily Collman, Alice Evans, James Richards, Elin Hughes, Lydia Acquah, Helen Parsons, Jo Morrison
{"title":"Improving the visibility and communication of treatment escalation plans in Somerset NHS foundation trust.","authors":"Oliver King,&nbsp;Emily Collman,&nbsp;Alice Evans,&nbsp;James Richards,&nbsp;Elin Hughes,&nbsp;Lydia Acquah,&nbsp;Helen Parsons,&nbsp;Jo Morrison","doi":"10.3233/JRS-227027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advance care treatment escalation plans (TEPs) are often lost between healthcare settings, leading to duplication of work and loss of patient autonomy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This quality improvement project reviewed the usage of TEP forms and aimed to improve completeness of documentation and visibility between admissions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over four months we monitored TEP form documentation using a standardised data extraction form. This examined section completion, seniority of documenting clinician and transfer of forms to our hospital electronic patient record (EPRO). We added reminders to computer monitors on wards to improve EPRO upload.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Initial data demonstrated that 95% of patients (n = 230) had a TEP, with 99% of TEPs recording resuscitation status. However, other sections were not well documented (patient capacity 57% completion and personal priorities 45% completion, respectively). Only 11.9% of TEPs documented consultant involvement. Furthermore, only 44% of TEPs with a do not attempt resuscitation (DNACPR) decision were uploaded. Following this, we added reminders to computer monitors explaining how to upload TEP decisions to EPRO, which increased EPRO uploads to 74%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Communication of TEPs needs improving across healthcare settings. This project showed that the use of a physical reminder can greatly improve communication of treatment escalation decisions. Furthermore, this intervention has inspired future projects aiming at making communication more sustainable through the use of discharge summaries.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/85/1c/jrs-33-jrs227027.PMC9844060.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/JRS-227027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Advance care treatment escalation plans (TEPs) are often lost between healthcare settings, leading to duplication of work and loss of patient autonomy.

Objective: This quality improvement project reviewed the usage of TEP forms and aimed to improve completeness of documentation and visibility between admissions.

Methods: Over four months we monitored TEP form documentation using a standardised data extraction form. This examined section completion, seniority of documenting clinician and transfer of forms to our hospital electronic patient record (EPRO). We added reminders to computer monitors on wards to improve EPRO upload.

Results: Initial data demonstrated that 95% of patients (n = 230) had a TEP, with 99% of TEPs recording resuscitation status. However, other sections were not well documented (patient capacity 57% completion and personal priorities 45% completion, respectively). Only 11.9% of TEPs documented consultant involvement. Furthermore, only 44% of TEPs with a do not attempt resuscitation (DNACPR) decision were uploaded. Following this, we added reminders to computer monitors explaining how to upload TEP decisions to EPRO, which increased EPRO uploads to 74%.

Conclusion: Communication of TEPs needs improving across healthcare settings. This project showed that the use of a physical reminder can greatly improve communication of treatment escalation decisions. Furthermore, this intervention has inspired future projects aiming at making communication more sustainable through the use of discharge summaries.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
改善萨默塞特NHS基金会信托治疗升级计划的可见性和沟通。
背景:预先护理治疗升级计划(TEPs)经常在医疗机构之间丢失,导致工作重复和患者自主权的丧失。目的:本质量改进项目回顾了TEP表格的使用情况,旨在提高文件的完整性和招生之间的可见性。方法:在四个多月的时间里,我们使用标准化的数据提取表监测TEP表格文档。本研究考察了部分完成情况、记录临床医生的资历以及将表格转移到我院电子病历(EPRO)的情况。我们在病房的电脑显示器上增加了提醒,以改善EPRO的上传。结果:初步数据显示95%的患者(n = 230)有TEP, 99%的TEP记录了复苏状态。然而,其他部分没有很好地记录(患者能力完成率为57%,个人优先级完成率为45%)。只有11.9%的tep记录了顾问的参与。此外,只有44%的不尝试复苏(DNACPR)决定的tep被上传。在此之后,我们在计算机显示器上添加了提醒,解释如何将TEP决策上传到EPRO,这将EPRO上传率提高到74%。结论:tep的沟通需要在医疗机构中得到改善。该项目表明,使用物理提醒可以极大地改善治疗升级决策的沟通。此外,这一干预措施还启发了旨在通过使用出院摘要使通讯更具可持续性的未来项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1