Rodent peri-implantitis models: a systematic review and meta-analysis of morphological changes.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.5051/jpis.2200900045
Ren Jie Jacob Chew, Jacinta Xiaotong Lu, Yu Fan Sim, Alvin Boon Keng Yeo
{"title":"Rodent peri-implantitis models: a systematic review and meta-analysis of morphological changes.","authors":"Ren Jie Jacob Chew,&nbsp;Jacinta Xiaotong Lu,&nbsp;Yu Fan Sim,&nbsp;Alvin Boon Keng Yeo","doi":"10.5051/jpis.2200900045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Rodent models have emerged as an alternative to established larger animal models for peri-implantitis research. However, the construct validity of rodent models is controversial due to a lack of consensus regarding their histological, morphological, and biochemical characteristics. This systematic review sought to validate rodent models by characterizing their morphological changes, particularly marginal bone loss (MBL), a hallmark of peri-implantitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. A literature search was performed electronically using MEDLINE (PubMed), and Embase, identifying pre-clinical studies reporting MBL after experimental peri-implantitis induction in rodents. Each study's risk of bias was assessed using the Systematic Review Center for Laboratory animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) risk of bias tool. A meta-analysis was performed for the difference in MBL, comparing healthy implants to those with experimental peri-implantitis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1,014 unique records retrieved, 23 studies that met the eligibility criteria were included. Peri-implantitis was induced using 4 methods: ligatures, lipopolysaccharide, microbial infection, and titanium particles. Studies presented high to unclear risks of bias. During the osseointegration phase, 11.6% and 6.4%-11.3% of implants inserted in mice and rats, respectively, had failed to osseointegrate. Twelve studies were included in the meta-analysis of the linear MBL measured using micro-computed tomography. Following experimental peri-implantitis, the MBL was estimated to be 0.25 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14-0.36 mm) in mice and 0.26 mm (95% CI, 0.19-0.34 mm) in rats. The resulting peri-implant MBL was circumferential, consisting of supra- and infrabony components.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Experimental peri-implantitis in rodent models results in circumferential MBL, with morphology consistent with the clinical presentation of peri-implantitis. While rodent models are promising, there is still a need to further characterize their healing potentials, standardize experiment protocols, and improve the reporting of results and methodology.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42020209776.</p>","PeriodicalId":48795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science","volume":"52 6","pages":"479-495"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d9/ae/jpis-52-479.PMC9807853.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2200900045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: Rodent models have emerged as an alternative to established larger animal models for peri-implantitis research. However, the construct validity of rodent models is controversial due to a lack of consensus regarding their histological, morphological, and biochemical characteristics. This systematic review sought to validate rodent models by characterizing their morphological changes, particularly marginal bone loss (MBL), a hallmark of peri-implantitis.

Methods: This review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. A literature search was performed electronically using MEDLINE (PubMed), and Embase, identifying pre-clinical studies reporting MBL after experimental peri-implantitis induction in rodents. Each study's risk of bias was assessed using the Systematic Review Center for Laboratory animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) risk of bias tool. A meta-analysis was performed for the difference in MBL, comparing healthy implants to those with experimental peri-implantitis.

Results: Of the 1,014 unique records retrieved, 23 studies that met the eligibility criteria were included. Peri-implantitis was induced using 4 methods: ligatures, lipopolysaccharide, microbial infection, and titanium particles. Studies presented high to unclear risks of bias. During the osseointegration phase, 11.6% and 6.4%-11.3% of implants inserted in mice and rats, respectively, had failed to osseointegrate. Twelve studies were included in the meta-analysis of the linear MBL measured using micro-computed tomography. Following experimental peri-implantitis, the MBL was estimated to be 0.25 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14-0.36 mm) in mice and 0.26 mm (95% CI, 0.19-0.34 mm) in rats. The resulting peri-implant MBL was circumferential, consisting of supra- and infrabony components.

Conclusions: Experimental peri-implantitis in rodent models results in circumferential MBL, with morphology consistent with the clinical presentation of peri-implantitis. While rodent models are promising, there is still a need to further characterize their healing potentials, standardize experiment protocols, and improve the reporting of results and methodology.

Trial registration: PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42020209776.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
啮齿动物种植体周围炎模型:形态学变化的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:啮齿动物模型已成为种植体周围炎研究的一种替代方法。然而,由于对啮齿动物模型的组织学、形态学和生化特征缺乏共识,构建的有效性存在争议。本系统综述试图通过表征啮齿动物的形态学变化来验证啮齿动物模型,特别是边缘骨质流失(MBL),这是种植体周围炎的标志。方法:本综述按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行。使用MEDLINE (PubMed)和Embase进行电子文献检索,确定啮齿类动物在实验性种植体周围炎诱导后出现MBL的临床前研究。使用实验动物实验系统评价中心(sycle)偏倚风险工具评估每项研究的偏倚风险。对健康种植体与实验性种植体周围炎种植体的MBL差异进行了荟萃分析。结果:在检索到的1014个独特记录中,23个研究符合入选标准。采用结扎法、脂多糖法、微生物感染法、钛颗粒法4种方法诱导种植体周围炎。研究显示了高到不明确的偏倚风险。在骨整合阶段,分别有11.6%和6.4%-11.3%的植入物在小鼠和大鼠体内骨整合失败。采用微计算机断层扫描测量线性MBL的meta分析中纳入了12项研究。在实验性种植体周围炎后,小鼠的MBL估计为0.25 mm(95%置信区间[CI], 0.14-0.36 mm),大鼠的MBL估计为0.26 mm (95% CI, 0.19-0.34 mm)。所得到的种植体周围MBL是周向的,由骨上和骨下组成。结论:实验性种植周炎在啮齿类动物模型中导致周向MBL,其形态与临床表现一致。虽然啮齿类动物模型很有前景,但仍需要进一步表征其治疗潜力,规范实验方案,改进结果报告和方法。试验注册:PROSPERO标识符:CRD42020209776。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science (JPIS) is a peer-reviewed and open-access journal providing up-to-date information relevant to professionalism of periodontology and dental implantology. JPIS is dedicated to global and extensive publication which includes evidence-based original articles, and fundamental reviews in order to cover a variety of interests in the field of periodontal as well as implant science.
期刊最新文献
Does defect configuration affect the outcomes of alveolar ridge preservation? An experimental in vivo study. Comprehensive treatment protocol for peri-implantitis: an up-to date narrative review of the literature. Guided bone regeneration of calcium phosphate-coated and strontium ranelate-doped titanium mesh in a rat calvarial defect model. Soft-tissue volume augmentation using a connective tissue graft and a volume-stable collagen matrix with polydeoxyribonucleotide for immediate implant placement: a pilot study in a dog model. The activin/BMP-2 chimera AB204 promotes periodontal tissue regeneration in a buccal dehiscence model: a pilot study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1