Toward Empathetic Autism Research: Developing an Autism-Specific Research Passport.

Maria Ashworth, Laura Crane, Robyn Steward, Melissa Bovis, Elizabeth Pellicano
{"title":"Toward Empathetic Autism Research: Developing an Autism-Specific Research Passport.","authors":"Maria Ashworth, Laura Crane, Robyn Steward, Melissa Bovis, Elizabeth Pellicano","doi":"10.1089/aut.2020.0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Autistic adults sometimes report negative experiences of research participation. People have developed <i>passports</i> or <i>toolkits</i> in other areas where community members report dissatisfaction (e.g., health care, criminal justice). We created a <i>Research Passport</i> that autism researchers and autistic adults could use to support the inclusion of autistic adults as research participants. We designed and developed the Research Passport via an iterative design process. First, we gathered ideas for a Research Passport via focus groups with autistic adults without an intellectual disability (ID) (<i>n</i> = 9) and autism researchers (<i>n</i> = 6; one of whom was autistic). We found that the Research Passport (1) was a useful idea, but not a panacea for all issues in autism research, (2) needed to be universal and flexible, and (3) could have a broad remit (e.g., to record scores on commonly used standardized tasks that could, with permission, be shared with different researchers). Next, we conducted a preliminary evaluation of a prototype Research Passport via usability testing in three ongoing research projects. Nine autistic participants without an ID provided feedback on the Research Passport (via a survey), as did three nonautistic researchers (via interviews). We found that the Research Passport (1) promoted positive participant-researcher relationships, (2) provided a structure and framework to support existing practices, and (3) needed to be adapted slightly to facilitate usability and manage expectations. Overall, the Research Passport was useful in promoting empathetic autism research. Further design and development of the Research Passport are warranted.</p><p><strong>Lay summary: </strong><b>Why was this research developed?:</b> Autistic adults taking part in research do not always have good experiences. An autistic member on our team thought that a <i>Research Passport</i> could help improve people's experiences. This idea was inspired by \"passports\" or \"toolkits\" that autistic people can use when visiting professionals such as doctors (so the doctor knows about the person and how to support them).<b>What does the Research Passport do?:</b> The Research Passport lets autistic people tell researchers about themselves before taking part in a research study. Autistic people can decide how much, or how little, they tell the researcher. Autistic and/or nonautistic researchers can use the Research Passport to try and make sure that their autistic participants have good experiences when taking part in research.<b>How did the researchers evaluate the Research Passport?:</b> First, nine autistic adults (who did not have an intellectual disability) and six autism researchers took part in group discussions. We asked what they thought about our Research Passport idea and what it should include. We made a Research Passport mock-up based on these discussions. Nine autistic participants who did not have an intellectual disability used the mock-up in one of three university research projects. Autistic participants completed a survey to tell us good and not-so-good things about the Research Passport. Also, we interviewed three researchers about using the Research Passport (asking what they liked and what could have been better).<b>What were the findings?:</b> Autistic adults and researchers involved in designing the Research Passport thought the Research Passport (1) could be useful but could not solve all problems in autism research, (2) needed to be suitable for many different people, and (3) could have many different benefits (e.g., collecting participants' scores on tests that researchers use a lot, so participants do not have to keep doing the same tests each time they take part in a new research study).Autistic adults and researchers used the Research Passport in ongoing studies and told us that it (1) led to good relationships between participants and researchers, (2) helped researchers make sure that the way they did their research was acceptable, and (3) was useful. However, participants need to be told what the Research Passport can/cannot help them with.<b>What were the weaknesses of this project?:</b> This study involved a small group of autistic adults and researchers, and the results may not be the same with autistic adults and researchers who have different needs. Also, participants said the Research Passport was not very easy to complete, and a bit long. We need to change the Research Passport so that a wider range of autistic people (like those with intellectual disability) can use it.<b>What are the next steps?:</b> The Research Passport needs to be professionally designed so it is easier to be used by a wider range of autistic people. A bigger evaluation of the Research Passport could allow us to test it with more participants and in more research studies.<b>How will this work help autistic adults now or in the future?:</b> Using the Research Passport could, with some changes and alongside other supports, improve the experience of autistic adults taking part in research.</p>","PeriodicalId":72338,"journal":{"name":"Autism in adulthood : challenges and management","volume":"3 3","pages":"280-288"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8992899/pdf/aut.2020.0026.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autism in adulthood : challenges and management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2020.0026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Autistic adults sometimes report negative experiences of research participation. People have developed passports or toolkits in other areas where community members report dissatisfaction (e.g., health care, criminal justice). We created a Research Passport that autism researchers and autistic adults could use to support the inclusion of autistic adults as research participants. We designed and developed the Research Passport via an iterative design process. First, we gathered ideas for a Research Passport via focus groups with autistic adults without an intellectual disability (ID) (n = 9) and autism researchers (n = 6; one of whom was autistic). We found that the Research Passport (1) was a useful idea, but not a panacea for all issues in autism research, (2) needed to be universal and flexible, and (3) could have a broad remit (e.g., to record scores on commonly used standardized tasks that could, with permission, be shared with different researchers). Next, we conducted a preliminary evaluation of a prototype Research Passport via usability testing in three ongoing research projects. Nine autistic participants without an ID provided feedback on the Research Passport (via a survey), as did three nonautistic researchers (via interviews). We found that the Research Passport (1) promoted positive participant-researcher relationships, (2) provided a structure and framework to support existing practices, and (3) needed to be adapted slightly to facilitate usability and manage expectations. Overall, the Research Passport was useful in promoting empathetic autism research. Further design and development of the Research Passport are warranted.

Lay summary: Why was this research developed?: Autistic adults taking part in research do not always have good experiences. An autistic member on our team thought that a Research Passport could help improve people's experiences. This idea was inspired by "passports" or "toolkits" that autistic people can use when visiting professionals such as doctors (so the doctor knows about the person and how to support them).What does the Research Passport do?: The Research Passport lets autistic people tell researchers about themselves before taking part in a research study. Autistic people can decide how much, or how little, they tell the researcher. Autistic and/or nonautistic researchers can use the Research Passport to try and make sure that their autistic participants have good experiences when taking part in research.How did the researchers evaluate the Research Passport?: First, nine autistic adults (who did not have an intellectual disability) and six autism researchers took part in group discussions. We asked what they thought about our Research Passport idea and what it should include. We made a Research Passport mock-up based on these discussions. Nine autistic participants who did not have an intellectual disability used the mock-up in one of three university research projects. Autistic participants completed a survey to tell us good and not-so-good things about the Research Passport. Also, we interviewed three researchers about using the Research Passport (asking what they liked and what could have been better).What were the findings?: Autistic adults and researchers involved in designing the Research Passport thought the Research Passport (1) could be useful but could not solve all problems in autism research, (2) needed to be suitable for many different people, and (3) could have many different benefits (e.g., collecting participants' scores on tests that researchers use a lot, so participants do not have to keep doing the same tests each time they take part in a new research study).Autistic adults and researchers used the Research Passport in ongoing studies and told us that it (1) led to good relationships between participants and researchers, (2) helped researchers make sure that the way they did their research was acceptable, and (3) was useful. However, participants need to be told what the Research Passport can/cannot help them with.What were the weaknesses of this project?: This study involved a small group of autistic adults and researchers, and the results may not be the same with autistic adults and researchers who have different needs. Also, participants said the Research Passport was not very easy to complete, and a bit long. We need to change the Research Passport so that a wider range of autistic people (like those with intellectual disability) can use it.What are the next steps?: The Research Passport needs to be professionally designed so it is easier to be used by a wider range of autistic people. A bigger evaluation of the Research Passport could allow us to test it with more participants and in more research studies.How will this work help autistic adults now or in the future?: Using the Research Passport could, with some changes and alongside other supports, improve the experience of autistic adults taking part in research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开展富有同情心的自闭症研究:开发自闭症专用研究护照。
自闭症成年人有时会报告参与研究的负面经历。在社区成员表示不满的其他领域(如医疗保健、刑事司法),人们已经开发了护照或工具包。我们制作了一本研究护照,自闭症研究人员和成年自闭症患者可以使用它来支持将成年自闭症患者作为研究参与者。我们通过迭代设计流程设计并开发了 "研究护照"。首先,我们通过与非智障 (ID) 自闭症成人(n = 9)和自闭症研究人员(n = 6;其中一人是自闭症患者)的焦点小组讨论,收集了关于 "研究护照 "的想法。我们发现,"研究护照"(1)是一个有用的想法,但不是解决自闭症研究中所有问题的灵丹妙药;(2)需要具有通用性和灵活性;(3)可以有广泛的职权范围(例如,记录常用标准化任务的得分,经许可后可与不同的研究人员共享)。接下来,我们在三个正在进行的研究项目中通过可用性测试对研究护照原型进行了初步评估。九名没有身份证明的自闭症参与者(通过调查)和三名非自闭症研究人员(通过访谈)对 "研究护照 "提供了反馈意见。我们发现,"研究护照"(1)促进了参与者与研究人员之间的积极关系,(2)提供了支持现有实践的结构和框架,(3)需要稍作调整,以提高可用性和管理期望值。总的来说,研究护照对促进移情自闭症研究很有帮助。研究护照的进一步设计和开发是有必要的:成人自闭症患者参与研究的经历并不总是美好的。我们团队中的一名自闭症成员认为,研究护照可以帮助改善人们的体验。这个想法受到了 "护照 "或 "工具包 "的启发,自闭症患者在看医生等专业人士时可以使用 "护照 "或 "工具包"(以便医生了解患者的情况以及如何为他们提供支持):研究护照 "让自闭症患者在参与研究前向研究人员介绍自己。自闭症患者可以决定告诉研究人员多少信息。研究人员如何评估研究护照?首先,九名成年自闭症患者(无智力障碍)和六名自闭症研究人员参加了小组讨论。我们询问了他们对 "研究护照 "想法的看法,以及 "研究护照 "应包括哪些内容。我们根据这些讨论制作了研究护照模型。九名没有智力障碍的自闭症参与者在三个大学研究项目中使用了该模拟护照。自闭症参与者填写了一份调查问卷,告诉我们 "研究护照 "的优点和缺点。此外,我们还就研究护照的使用情况采访了三位研究人员(询问他们喜欢什么,哪些地方可以做得更好):参与设计 "研究护照 "的成年自闭症患者和研究人员认为 "研究护照":(1)可能有用,但不能解决自闭症研究中的所有问题;(2)需要适合许多不同的人群;(3)可能有许多不同的益处(例如,收集参与者在测试中的分数,以便研究人员进行研究)、自闭症成人和研究人员在正在进行的研究中使用了 "研究护照",并告诉我们:(1) 使参与者和研究人员建立了良好的关系;(2) 帮助研究人员确保他们的研究方式是可以接受的;(3) 非常有用。不过,需要告诉参与者《研究护照》能/不能帮助他们做什么:本研究只涉及一小部分自闭症成人和研究人员,研究结果可能与具有不同需求的自闭症成人和研究人员的研究结果不同。此外,参与者认为研究护照不太容易填写,而且有点长。我们需要修改《研究护照》,以便更多自闭症患者(如智障人士)可以使用:研究护照需要经过专业设计,以便更多自闭症患者使用。对 "研究护照 "进行更大规模的评估可以让我们在更多的参与者和更多的研究中对其进行测试:使用《研究护照》可以改善自闭症成人参与研究的体验,只要做出一些改变,并配合其他支持措施即可。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Community Member Views on Autism Intervention: Effects of Closeness to Autistic People with Intellectual Disabilities And Nonspeaking Autistic People. Call for Papers: Autism and Aging: A Lifespan Approach: Deadline for Manuscript Submission: January 15, 2024. A Qualitative Study of Autistic Adults' Quality of Life During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Lockdowns. Autistic People and Moving Home: A Systematic Review. Early-Career Autism Researchers Are Shifting Their Research Directions: Tragedy or Opportunity?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1