The Role and Efficacy of Vitamin C in Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.8 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Advances in respiratory medicine Pub Date : 2022-07-28 DOI:10.3390/arm90040038
Marwah Muhammad, Ahmad Jahangir, Ali Kassem, Saud Bin Abdul Sattar, Abdullah Jahangir, Syeda Sahra, Muhammad Rafay Khan Niazi, Ahmad Mustafa, Zeeshan Zia, Fasih Sami Siddiqui, Waleed Sadiq, Danil Mishiyev, Aleena Sammar, Loai Dahabra, Aazib Irshad, Dany Elsayegh, Michel Chalhoub
{"title":"The Role and Efficacy of Vitamin C in Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Marwah Muhammad, Ahmad Jahangir, Ali Kassem, Saud Bin Abdul Sattar, Abdullah Jahangir, Syeda Sahra, Muhammad Rafay Khan Niazi, Ahmad Mustafa, Zeeshan Zia, Fasih Sami Siddiqui, Waleed Sadiq, Danil Mishiyev, Aleena Sammar, Loai Dahabra, Aazib Irshad, Dany Elsayegh, Michel Chalhoub","doi":"10.3390/arm90040038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical rationale for study: Despite advancements in critical care, the mortality rate of sepsis remains high, with an overall poor prognosis. There is a complex pathophysiology of a lethal cascade of cytokines and inflammatory proteins underlying sepsis. The use of vitamin C can theoretically suppress the inflammatory cascade but remains a questionable practice due to a lack of conclusive evidence. Aims of the study: To appraise the therapeutic role of vitamin C in sepsis. Materials and methods: A systematic review was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and the Central Cochrane Registry. The study included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with vitamin C as an intervention arm in the septic patient population. For continuous variables, the difference in means (MD) and for discrete variables, the odds ratio (OR) was used. For effect sizes, a confidence interval of 95% was used. A p-value of less than 0.05 was used for statistical significance. The analysis was performed using a random-effects model irrespective of heterogeneity. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the I2 statistic. Results: 23 studies were included with the total sample size of 2712 patients. In patients treated with vitamin C, there was a statistically significant reduction in the mortality: OR = 0.778 (0.635 to 0.954), p = 0.016; the sequential organ failure assessment score (SOFA): MD = −0.749 (−1.115 to −0.383), p < 0.001; and the duration of vasopressor requirement: MD = −1.034 days (−1.622 to −0.445), p = 0.001. No significant difference was found in the hospital or ICU length of stay. Conclusions and clinical implications: Vitamin C treatment regimens were associated with reduced mortality, SOFA score, and vasopressor requirement compared to the control in sepsis. Given its low cost and minimal adverse effects, we strongly encourage further large, randomized trials to establish vitamin C as a standard of care in sepsis management.</p>","PeriodicalId":7391,"journal":{"name":"Advances in respiratory medicine","volume":"90 4","pages":"281-299"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9717327/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/arm90040038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical rationale for study: Despite advancements in critical care, the mortality rate of sepsis remains high, with an overall poor prognosis. There is a complex pathophysiology of a lethal cascade of cytokines and inflammatory proteins underlying sepsis. The use of vitamin C can theoretically suppress the inflammatory cascade but remains a questionable practice due to a lack of conclusive evidence. Aims of the study: To appraise the therapeutic role of vitamin C in sepsis. Materials and methods: A systematic review was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and the Central Cochrane Registry. The study included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with vitamin C as an intervention arm in the septic patient population. For continuous variables, the difference in means (MD) and for discrete variables, the odds ratio (OR) was used. For effect sizes, a confidence interval of 95% was used. A p-value of less than 0.05 was used for statistical significance. The analysis was performed using a random-effects model irrespective of heterogeneity. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the I2 statistic. Results: 23 studies were included with the total sample size of 2712 patients. In patients treated with vitamin C, there was a statistically significant reduction in the mortality: OR = 0.778 (0.635 to 0.954), p = 0.016; the sequential organ failure assessment score (SOFA): MD = −0.749 (−1.115 to −0.383), p < 0.001; and the duration of vasopressor requirement: MD = −1.034 days (−1.622 to −0.445), p = 0.001. No significant difference was found in the hospital or ICU length of stay. Conclusions and clinical implications: Vitamin C treatment regimens were associated with reduced mortality, SOFA score, and vasopressor requirement compared to the control in sepsis. Given its low cost and minimal adverse effects, we strongly encourage further large, randomized trials to establish vitamin C as a standard of care in sepsis management.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
维生素 C 在败血症中的作用和疗效:系统回顾与元分析》。
研究的临床依据:尽管重症监护技术不断进步,但败血症的死亡率仍然很高,总体预后较差。脓毒症的病理生理学十分复杂,其基础是细胞因子和炎症蛋白的致命级联反应。使用维生素 C 理论上可以抑制炎症级联反应,但由于缺乏确凿证据,这种做法仍值得商榷。研究目的评估维生素 C 在败血症中的治疗作用。材料和方法:在 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 注册中心进行了系统性回顾。研究纳入了以维生素 C 作为败血症患者干预措施的随机临床试验 (RCT)。连续变量采用均值差(MD),离散变量采用几率比(OR)。效应大小的置信区间为 95%。统计学意义采用小于 0.05 的 p 值。无论异质性如何,均采用随机效应模型进行分析。异质性采用 I2 统计量进行评估。结果:共纳入 23 项研究,总样本量为 2712 例患者。在接受维生素 C 治疗的患者中,死亡率有统计学意义的显著降低:OR=0.778(0.635 至 0.954),P=0.016;序贯器官衰竭评估评分(SOFA):MD = -0.749 (-1.115 to -0.383),p < 0.001;血管加压剂需求持续时间:MD = -1.034 天(-1.622 至 -0.445),P = 0.001。住院时间和重症监护室住院时间没有明显差异。结论和临床意义:与脓毒症对照组相比,维生素 C 治疗方案可降低死亡率、SOFA 评分和血管加压素需求量。鉴于其成本低、不良反应小,我们强烈建议进一步开展大型随机试验,将维生素 C 确立为脓毒症治疗的标准护理方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in respiratory medicine
Advances in respiratory medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: "Advances in Respiratory Medicine" is a new international title for "Pneumonologia i Alergologia Polska", edited bimonthly and addressed to respiratory professionals. The Journal contains peer-reviewed original research papers, short communications, case-reports, recommendations of the Polish Respiratory Society concerning the diagnosis and treatment of lung diseases, editorials, postgraduate education articles, letters and book reviews in the field of pneumonology, allergology, oncology, immunology and infectious diseases. "Advances in Respiratory Medicine" is an open access, official journal of Polish Society of Lung Diseases, Polish Society of Allergology and National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases.
期刊最新文献
Expression of Epithelial Alarmin Receptor on Innate Lymphoid Cells Type 2 in Eosinophilic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Utility of Raman Spectroscopy in Pulmonary Medicine. Secure and Transparent Lung and Colon Cancer Classification Using Blockchain and Microsoft Azure. Comparing the Effects of Two Surfactant Administration Methods: Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy (MIST) with Intubation (INSURE) in Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome. The Impact of Different Telerehabilitation Methods on Peripheral Muscle Strength and Aerobic Capacity in COPD Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1