Spotlight on Three Rs Progress.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Atla-Alternatives To Laboratory Animals Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/02611929221146602
{"title":"Spotlight on Three Rs Progress.","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/02611929221146602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of animals in biomedical research is increasingly the subject of debate and concern. A growing range of modern and ever-improving techniques — new approach methodologies (NAMs) — can replace the use of animals while providing results that are more likely to be relevant to humans. While NAMs are more and more accepted by the scientific community, there is still a significant lack of confidence and thus adoption among biomedical researchers. Insufficient awareness and/or validation of tools, accessibility and lack of knowledge are salient obstacles. In other words, there is a need for more communication between biomedical researchers and industry to validate these tools, and for more concrete methodology, guidelines and standardisation efforts to gain more support for adoption. A Community of Practice (CoP) is generally a network of people who share a concern, set of problems or passion about a topic, and who deepen their expertise and knowledge by interacting on an ongoing basis. A CoP’s activities are determined by its members, and can include: networking; forum discussion; organising and promoting events; sharing resources; building new collaborations; circulating information; and sharing and discussing results (both positive and negative). The Alliance for Human Relevant Science and Animal Free Research UK have launched a one-of-its-kind online CoP, to help improve communication among biomedical scientists from around the world and bring them together to practice human-relevant research. Forming a CoP such as this can help stakeholders in creating, expanding and exchanging knowledge, in order to develop individual capabilities and learn the way together towards concerted action for managing systemic change and making humancentred practice the gold standard of research. The platform is curated by members and Animal Free Research UK coordinators. Membership is free, and new members can sign up and join the community at https:// animalfreeresearchcommunity.com/signup. Members are invited to add content, create and share events and resources, and to collaborate on projects. Academic researchers, early career scientists, students, industry experts and other stakeholders involved in the biomedical research sector can interact online, as well as attend planned events. For more information, contact Lilas Courtot (Lilas@animalfreeresearchuk.org), or visit www.animalfreeresearch community.com","PeriodicalId":55577,"journal":{"name":"Atla-Alternatives To Laboratory Animals","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atla-Alternatives To Laboratory Animals","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02611929221146602","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of animals in biomedical research is increasingly the subject of debate and concern. A growing range of modern and ever-improving techniques — new approach methodologies (NAMs) — can replace the use of animals while providing results that are more likely to be relevant to humans. While NAMs are more and more accepted by the scientific community, there is still a significant lack of confidence and thus adoption among biomedical researchers. Insufficient awareness and/or validation of tools, accessibility and lack of knowledge are salient obstacles. In other words, there is a need for more communication between biomedical researchers and industry to validate these tools, and for more concrete methodology, guidelines and standardisation efforts to gain more support for adoption. A Community of Practice (CoP) is generally a network of people who share a concern, set of problems or passion about a topic, and who deepen their expertise and knowledge by interacting on an ongoing basis. A CoP’s activities are determined by its members, and can include: networking; forum discussion; organising and promoting events; sharing resources; building new collaborations; circulating information; and sharing and discussing results (both positive and negative). The Alliance for Human Relevant Science and Animal Free Research UK have launched a one-of-its-kind online CoP, to help improve communication among biomedical scientists from around the world and bring them together to practice human-relevant research. Forming a CoP such as this can help stakeholders in creating, expanding and exchanging knowledge, in order to develop individual capabilities and learn the way together towards concerted action for managing systemic change and making humancentred practice the gold standard of research. The platform is curated by members and Animal Free Research UK coordinators. Membership is free, and new members can sign up and join the community at https:// animalfreeresearchcommunity.com/signup. Members are invited to add content, create and share events and resources, and to collaborate on projects. Academic researchers, early career scientists, students, industry experts and other stakeholders involved in the biomedical research sector can interact online, as well as attend planned events. For more information, contact Lilas Courtot (Lilas@animalfreeresearchuk.org), or visit www.animalfreeresearch community.com
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
聚焦“三个r”进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
60
审稿时长
>18 weeks
期刊介绍: Alternatives to Laboratory Animals (ATLA) is a peer-reviewed journal, intended to cover all aspects of the development, validation, implementation and use of alternatives to laboratory animals in biomedical research and toxicity testing. In addition to the replacement of animals, it also covers work that aims to reduce the number of animals used and refine the in vivo experiments that are still carried out.
期刊最新文献
Introducing the COST Action 'Improving the Quality of Biomedical Science with 3Rs Concepts' (IMPROVE). Journeying Through Journals: The Publishing Process and How to Maximise Research Impact. Progress and Remaining Opportunities to Increase the Use of Animal-free Antibodies in the USA. Editorial. An Evaluation of the Replacement of Animal-derived Biomaterials in Human Primary Cell Culture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1