Malignant B-cell Lymphoma, WHO Classification and the Respective 18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose Positron Emission Tomography Results

M. Hoffmann, M. Raderer
{"title":"Malignant B-cell Lymphoma, WHO Classification and the Respective 18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose Positron Emission Tomography Results","authors":"M. Hoffmann,&nbsp;M. Raderer","doi":"10.1111/j.1617-0830.2007.00084.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Malignant lymphomas represent a diverse range of diseases with exceedingly different behaviour. The common clinical denominator, however, is necessary for correct staging and reliable monitoring of therapy. Many reports on the usefulness of 18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) in staging and follow-up of lymphomas have been published with very promising results. The aim of this review was to highlight the impact of 18F-FDG-PET with respect to the distinct lymphoma entities. The possible future role of PET/computed tomography (CT) is tersely mentioned. Reviewing the literature regarding 18F-FDG-PET according to the WHO classification of lymphomas found the method to be highly reliable in Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL), and especially useful in therapy monitoring in HL patients. Promising data have also been published on follicular lymphoma in spite of its indolent nature, and for the aggressive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma 18F-FDG-PET should be considered standard in assessment of response. For marginal zone lymphoma, especially its common extranodal variant (mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma) 18F-FDG-PET results are varying, and the method cannot be recommended for uncritical widespread use in the clinical practice. For the less common lymphoma entities, only few results could be found, but they were nevertheless promising for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). More mature data are nevertheless still needed to judge the use of 18F-FDG-PET in MCL.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":89151,"journal":{"name":"Imaging decisions (Berlin, Germany)","volume":"10 4","pages":"14-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1617-0830.2007.00084.x","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging decisions (Berlin, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1617-0830.2007.00084.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Malignant lymphomas represent a diverse range of diseases with exceedingly different behaviour. The common clinical denominator, however, is necessary for correct staging and reliable monitoring of therapy. Many reports on the usefulness of 18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) in staging and follow-up of lymphomas have been published with very promising results. The aim of this review was to highlight the impact of 18F-FDG-PET with respect to the distinct lymphoma entities. The possible future role of PET/computed tomography (CT) is tersely mentioned. Reviewing the literature regarding 18F-FDG-PET according to the WHO classification of lymphomas found the method to be highly reliable in Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL), and especially useful in therapy monitoring in HL patients. Promising data have also been published on follicular lymphoma in spite of its indolent nature, and for the aggressive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma 18F-FDG-PET should be considered standard in assessment of response. For marginal zone lymphoma, especially its common extranodal variant (mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma) 18F-FDG-PET results are varying, and the method cannot be recommended for uncritical widespread use in the clinical practice. For the less common lymphoma entities, only few results could be found, but they were nevertheless promising for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). More mature data are nevertheless still needed to judge the use of 18F-FDG-PET in MCL.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
恶性b细胞淋巴瘤,WHO分类和各自的18f -氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描结果
恶性淋巴瘤代表了一系列表现极不相同的疾病。然而,对于正确的分期和可靠的治疗监测,共同的临床标准是必要的。许多关于18f -氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(18F-FDG-PET)在淋巴瘤分期和随访中的作用的报道已经发表,结果非常令人鼓舞。本综述的目的是强调18F-FDG-PET对不同淋巴瘤实体的影响。简要地提到了PET/计算机断层扫描(CT)未来可能发挥的作用。根据WHO对淋巴瘤的分类回顾18F-FDG-PET的相关文献,发现该方法在霍奇金淋巴瘤(HL)中具有很高的可靠性,尤其适用于HL患者的治疗监测。尽管滤泡性淋巴瘤具有惰性,但也发表了令人鼓舞的数据,对于侵袭性弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤,18F-FDG-PET应被视为评估疗效的标准。对于边缘带淋巴瘤,特别是其常见的结外变异(粘膜相关淋巴组织淋巴瘤),18F-FDG-PET结果是不同的,不能推荐该方法在临床实践中不加鉴别地广泛使用。对于不太常见的淋巴瘤实体,只能找到很少的结果,但它们对于套细胞淋巴瘤(MCL)仍然有希望。然而,还需要更成熟的数据来判断18F-FDG-PET在MCL中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Problem-Solving Modality? Spectroscopic Imaging of Breast Cancer Breast MR-Imaging of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Systematic Review Understanding and Application of Different Breast Imaging Studies Breast Imaging, Overview and New Developments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1