Heavy Sand and Crumb Rubber Topdressing Improves Kentucky Bluegrass Wear Tolerance

Alexander R. Kowalewski, Jeff C. Dunne, John N. Rogers III, James R. Crum
{"title":"Heavy Sand and Crumb Rubber Topdressing Improves Kentucky Bluegrass Wear Tolerance","authors":"Alexander R. Kowalewski,&nbsp;Jeff C. Dunne,&nbsp;John N. Rogers III,&nbsp;James R. Crum","doi":"10.1094/ATS-2011-1223-01-RS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sand topdressing and crumb rubber can be used to improve native soil athletic field playability. However, there is a wide range in the physical properties, price, and availability of these materials. The objective of this field research was to evaluate the effects of various topdressing materials on the autumn wear tolerance and surface stability of a well established Kentucky bluegrass (<i>Poa pratensis</i> L.) stand. Research was conducted on a sandy loam in East Lansing, MI, to evaluate the effects of four different sand-based materials with a range of physical properties, crumb rubber, a treatment that received sand then crumb rubber and a non-topdressed control. In the first summer, 4.8 cm of sand-based topdressing material, 2.4 cm of crumb rubber, and 2.4 cm of sand then 2.4 cm of crumb rubber was accumulated over their respective plots. Turf was subjected to simulated traffic using the Cady traffic simulator from mid-October through mid-November. In 2009, topdressing applications and subsequent traffic were repeated on the same experimental plots. Visual percent living ground cover (0 to 100%) and Clegg turf shear tester (TST) strength were measured. The control, while producing some of the greatest turf shear tester strength, provided the lowest turfgrass cover: 46.7% in 2008 and 35.0% in 2009. Crumb rubber, while being the most expensive topdressing material, provided the greatest turfgrass cover: 85.0% in 2008 and 90.0% in 2009. All sands provided comparable living ground cover and turf shear tester strength with the exception of a poorly-graded sand, which produced the lowest shear tester strength values in 2008.</p>","PeriodicalId":100111,"journal":{"name":"Applied Turfgrass Science","volume":"8 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1094/ATS-2011-1223-01-RS","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Turfgrass Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1094/ATS-2011-1223-01-RS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Sand topdressing and crumb rubber can be used to improve native soil athletic field playability. However, there is a wide range in the physical properties, price, and availability of these materials. The objective of this field research was to evaluate the effects of various topdressing materials on the autumn wear tolerance and surface stability of a well established Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) stand. Research was conducted on a sandy loam in East Lansing, MI, to evaluate the effects of four different sand-based materials with a range of physical properties, crumb rubber, a treatment that received sand then crumb rubber and a non-topdressed control. In the first summer, 4.8 cm of sand-based topdressing material, 2.4 cm of crumb rubber, and 2.4 cm of sand then 2.4 cm of crumb rubber was accumulated over their respective plots. Turf was subjected to simulated traffic using the Cady traffic simulator from mid-October through mid-November. In 2009, topdressing applications and subsequent traffic were repeated on the same experimental plots. Visual percent living ground cover (0 to 100%) and Clegg turf shear tester (TST) strength were measured. The control, while producing some of the greatest turf shear tester strength, provided the lowest turfgrass cover: 46.7% in 2008 and 35.0% in 2009. Crumb rubber, while being the most expensive topdressing material, provided the greatest turfgrass cover: 85.0% in 2008 and 90.0% in 2009. All sands provided comparable living ground cover and turf shear tester strength with the exception of a poorly-graded sand, which produced the lowest shear tester strength values in 2008.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重砂和橡胶屑抛肥提高肯塔基蓝草耐磨性
砂追肥和橡胶屑可用于提高原生土壤运动场的可玩性。然而,这些材料的物理性质、价格和可用性都有很大的差异。本研究的目的是评价不同追肥材料对肯塔基蓝草(Poa pratensis L.)立地秋季耐磨性和表面稳定性的影响。研究人员在密歇根州东兰辛的一块沙质壤土上进行了研究,以评估四种不同的砂基材料的效果,这些材料具有一系列的物理性质,分别是:碎橡胶、先用砂再用碎橡胶的处理方法和不涂布的对照。在第一个夏天,砂基追肥4.8 cm,橡胶屑2.4 cm,砂2.4 cm,然后橡胶屑2.4 cm。在10月中旬至11月中旬期间,使用Cady交通模拟器对草坪进行模拟交通。2009年,在相同的试验田重复施用追肥和随后的交通。测定活地覆盖目视百分比(0 ~ 100%)和克莱格草坪抗剪试验机(TST)强度。对照虽然产生了一些最大的草坪抗剪试验强度,但提供了最低的草坪覆盖率:2008年为46.7%,2009年为35.0%。橡胶屑虽然是最昂贵的追肥材料,但提供了最大的草坪草覆盖率:2008年为85.0%,2009年为90.0%。所有砂都提供了相当的活地表覆盖物和草坪抗剪强度,但分级较差的砂除外,该砂在2008年产生了最低的抗剪强度值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Antimicrobial Compounds on Etiolation Caused by Xanthomonas translucens and on Turf Quality of Creeping Bentgrass Putting-Green Turf Applicator and Primo Effects on the Persistence of Painted Golf Course Water Hazard and Out-of-Bounds Lines on Bermudagrass Cultivation Effects on Organic Matter Concentration and Infiltration Rates of Two Creeping Bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.) Putting Greens Amicarbazone Application Timing Influences Overseeded Perennial Ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) Safety and Annual Bluegrass (Poa annua L.) Control Turfgrass Winterkill Observations from the Great Lakes Region
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1