[Evaluation of the antigenicity of heart valve leaflets using inbred rat strain combinations (author's transl)].

C Timm, A Thiede, A Berhard, W Müller-Ruchholtz
{"title":"[Evaluation of the antigenicity of heart valve leaflets using inbred rat strain combinations (author's transl)].","authors":"C Timm,&nbsp;A Thiede,&nbsp;A Berhard,&nbsp;W Müller-Ruchholtz","doi":"10.1055/s-0028-1096608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Experiments with large, non-inbred animals yield no reliable evidence in the antigenicity of heart valves. With inbred strains of rats, however, it is possible to obtain evidence on the immunological reactions of heart valve leaflet transplants. Our experiments were undertaken on the inbred rat strains (CDR, LEW, CAP and BD5, using combinations as follows: syngeneic strain combination (CDF leads to CDF), weakly allogenic (RtH-1-identical) strain cimbination (LEW leads to CDF), strongly allogeneic (RtH-1-incompatible) strain combination (CAP leads to CDF). Strain BD5 was used for the control skin grafts. Either one or two heart valve leaflets were heterotopically intra-aortally transplanted. Sensitization was verified humorally by transplantation antibody titers and cellularly by subsequent donorspecific skin transplants. The following results were achieved: Allogeneic heart valve leaflets are antigenic. Intravascular grafting of one heart valve leaflet induces the same degree of sensitization as the grafting of two leaflets. In the RtH-1-identical system, sensitization is revealed only by subsequent skin grafting, whereas in the RtH-1-incompatible system, sensitization is humorally demonstrated as well. This indicates that in heart valve leaflet transplantation cellmediated reactivity is a more sensitive indicator than the humoral one. The greater the immunological difference is, the clearer the sensitization will be. In the strongly allogeneic system, the sensitization is even demonstrated humorally; skin grafts are rejected as \"white grafts\". Improved long-term results may be expected in allogeneic vital heart valve transplants if consideration is given to the HLA compatibility between donor and recipient; the appearance of delayed insufficiency could be greatly lessened or even deferred.</p>","PeriodicalId":22981,"journal":{"name":"Thoraxchirurgie, vaskulare Chirurgie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0028-1096608","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoraxchirurgie, vaskulare Chirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1096608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Experiments with large, non-inbred animals yield no reliable evidence in the antigenicity of heart valves. With inbred strains of rats, however, it is possible to obtain evidence on the immunological reactions of heart valve leaflet transplants. Our experiments were undertaken on the inbred rat strains (CDR, LEW, CAP and BD5, using combinations as follows: syngeneic strain combination (CDF leads to CDF), weakly allogenic (RtH-1-identical) strain cimbination (LEW leads to CDF), strongly allogeneic (RtH-1-incompatible) strain combination (CAP leads to CDF). Strain BD5 was used for the control skin grafts. Either one or two heart valve leaflets were heterotopically intra-aortally transplanted. Sensitization was verified humorally by transplantation antibody titers and cellularly by subsequent donorspecific skin transplants. The following results were achieved: Allogeneic heart valve leaflets are antigenic. Intravascular grafting of one heart valve leaflet induces the same degree of sensitization as the grafting of two leaflets. In the RtH-1-identical system, sensitization is revealed only by subsequent skin grafting, whereas in the RtH-1-incompatible system, sensitization is humorally demonstrated as well. This indicates that in heart valve leaflet transplantation cellmediated reactivity is a more sensitive indicator than the humoral one. The greater the immunological difference is, the clearer the sensitization will be. In the strongly allogeneic system, the sensitization is even demonstrated humorally; skin grafts are rejected as "white grafts". Improved long-term results may be expected in allogeneic vital heart valve transplants if consideration is given to the HLA compatibility between donor and recipient; the appearance of delayed insufficiency could be greatly lessened or even deferred.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[利用自交系大鼠组合评价心脏瓣膜小叶的抗原性(作者译)]。
在大型非近亲繁殖动物身上进行的实验没有得出关于心脏瓣膜抗原性的可靠证据。然而,对于近交系大鼠,有可能获得关于心脏瓣膜小叶移植的免疫反应的证据。本实验以自交系大鼠CDR、LEW、CAP和BD5菌株为实验对象,采用以下组合:同基因菌株组合(CDF导致CDF)、弱异基因(rth -1相同)菌株组合(LEW导致CDF)、强异基因(rth -1不相容)菌株组合(CAP导致CDF)。以菌株BD5作为对照植皮。一个或两个心脏瓣膜小叶异位主动脉内移植。致敏性通过体液移植抗体滴度和随后的供体特异性皮肤移植得到证实。异体心脏瓣膜小叶具有抗原性。单瓣血管内移植与双瓣血管内移植的致敏程度相同。在rth -1相同的系统中,敏化仅通过随后的皮肤移植显示,而在rth -1不相容的系统中,敏化也通过体液表现出来。这表明在心脏瓣叶移植中,细胞介导的反应性是一个比体液更敏感的指标。免疫差异越大,致敏性越明显。在强同种异体系统中,致敏性甚至在体液中得到证实;皮肤移植作为“白色移植”被拒绝。如果考虑到供体和受体之间的HLA相容性,异体重要心脏瓣膜移植的长期结果可能会得到改善;迟发性功能不全的出现可以大大减轻甚至推迟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Fresh autologus blood transfusion during open heart surgery (author's transl)]. [Longitudinal rupture of the aortic arche (author's transl)]. [Behaviour of ATP and lactate in human papillary muscle during profound hypothermia and injection cardioplegia with magnesium-asparatate-procaine (author's transl)]. [Biochemical and morphological investigations on the human heart in cardioplegia and profound hypothermia (author's transl)]. [Some psychological predictors for psychosis after open heart surgery (author's transl)].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1