A double blind cross-over study of maximal expiratory flows and arterial blood gas tensions in normals, asthmatics and bronchitics after salbutamol and ipratropin.

B Thiessen, O F Pedersen
{"title":"A double blind cross-over study of maximal expiratory flows and arterial blood gas tensions in normals, asthmatics and bronchitics after salbutamol and ipratropin.","authors":"B Thiessen,&nbsp;O F Pedersen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>8 normals, 8 asthmatics and 8 bronchitics inhaled comparable doses of ipratropin and salbutamol. Five different flow-volume parameters were measured before and at intervals from 3 to 360 minutes after inhalation, on a total number of 2880 maximal effort expiratory flow-volume curves. Arterial blood gas tensions were measured before and 60 minutes after inhalation. In all parameters a significant larger effect (p less than 0.05) of ipratropin was found in normals, but in different time intervals. The parameter FEV1 and MEF at 50% of FVC showed the largest effect of salbutamol during the interval from 3 to 60 minutes in the asthma patients. None of the parameters showed significant difference in drug effects in the bronchitis patients. The findings suggested a more peripheral action of ipratropin than of salbutamol in the normals. No significant change in gas tensions were found after inhalation in any of the three groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":21458,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of respiratory diseases. Supplementum","volume":"103 ","pages":"170-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1979-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of respiratory diseases. Supplementum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

8 normals, 8 asthmatics and 8 bronchitics inhaled comparable doses of ipratropin and salbutamol. Five different flow-volume parameters were measured before and at intervals from 3 to 360 minutes after inhalation, on a total number of 2880 maximal effort expiratory flow-volume curves. Arterial blood gas tensions were measured before and 60 minutes after inhalation. In all parameters a significant larger effect (p less than 0.05) of ipratropin was found in normals, but in different time intervals. The parameter FEV1 and MEF at 50% of FVC showed the largest effect of salbutamol during the interval from 3 to 60 minutes in the asthma patients. None of the parameters showed significant difference in drug effects in the bronchitis patients. The findings suggested a more peripheral action of ipratropin than of salbutamol in the normals. No significant change in gas tensions were found after inhalation in any of the three groups.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沙丁胺醇和异丙托品对正常人、哮喘患者和支气管炎患者最大呼气流量和动脉血气张力的双盲交叉研究。
8名正常人、8名哮喘患者和8名支气管炎患者吸入了相同剂量的异丙托品和沙丁胺醇。在共2880条最大用力呼气流量-体积曲线上,分别在吸入前和吸入后3 ~ 360分钟测量5种不同的流量-体积参数。分别于吸入前和吸入后60分钟测量动脉血气张力。在所有参数中,异丙托品对正常人的影响均显著大于(p < 0.05),但时间间隔不同。FEV1和MEF在FVC的50%时的参数显示,沙丁胺醇在3 ~ 60分钟的间隔内对哮喘患者的影响最大。所有参数均未显示支气管炎患者的药物效果有显著差异。研究结果表明,异丙托品比沙丁胺醇对正常人的外周作用更大。在三组中任何一组吸入后都没有发现明显的气体张力变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Aspects on bronchial beta2-receptor tolerance. Pathophysiologic mechanisms in asthma. Molecular and pharmacological aspects. Chromosome analysis of malignant human effusions in vivo. Pharmacokinetics of inhaled substances. Ipratropium bromide and fenoterol in pulmonary tuberculosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1