Mental Stress Induced Mental Injury Under the Louisiana Workers' Compensation Law: Striking a Right Social Policy Balance

K. K. Orie
{"title":"Mental Stress Induced Mental Injury Under the Louisiana Workers' Compensation Law: Striking a Right Social Policy Balance","authors":"K. K. Orie","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1962762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Louisiana State workers’ compensation law strives to balance the interests of employers and their employees for the benefit of the larger society. On the one hand, employers must be encouraged to be in business by protecting them from injured employees’ lawsuits that could bankrupt them. On the other hand, the employees must be guaranteed some measure of compensation for injury or illness they suffer in the workplace. Both outcomes are beneficial social policy goals. However, the balance is more delicate in cases of mental stress induced mental injury or illness without any physical injury (i.e. mental/mental injury) partly because it can be easily feigned. To guard against feigned mental/mental injury while supposedly allowing genuine mental/mental injury claim, the Louisiana law raises the standard for recovery in this kind of claims too high. A representative survey of these claims shows a disproportionately high rate of denial than recovery even in genuine mental/mental injury cases, raising the question of whether a right balance is being struck between the interests of employers and employees in ways supportive of the social policy goals of the workers’ compensation scheme. While the one case examined in which recovery was allowed had a third party element, it is unlikely that this could begin a trend in more recovery for genuine mental/mental injury claims. Therefore, the Louisiana legislature should revisit the standard along the lines suggested in this article to create a right balance in light of the beneficial social policy goals.","PeriodicalId":187399,"journal":{"name":"Disability Income & Work Injury Compensation eJournal","volume":"116 39","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability Income & Work Injury Compensation eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1962762","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Louisiana State workers’ compensation law strives to balance the interests of employers and their employees for the benefit of the larger society. On the one hand, employers must be encouraged to be in business by protecting them from injured employees’ lawsuits that could bankrupt them. On the other hand, the employees must be guaranteed some measure of compensation for injury or illness they suffer in the workplace. Both outcomes are beneficial social policy goals. However, the balance is more delicate in cases of mental stress induced mental injury or illness without any physical injury (i.e. mental/mental injury) partly because it can be easily feigned. To guard against feigned mental/mental injury while supposedly allowing genuine mental/mental injury claim, the Louisiana law raises the standard for recovery in this kind of claims too high. A representative survey of these claims shows a disproportionately high rate of denial than recovery even in genuine mental/mental injury cases, raising the question of whether a right balance is being struck between the interests of employers and employees in ways supportive of the social policy goals of the workers’ compensation scheme. While the one case examined in which recovery was allowed had a third party element, it is unlikely that this could begin a trend in more recovery for genuine mental/mental injury claims. Therefore, the Louisiana legislature should revisit the standard along the lines suggested in this article to create a right balance in light of the beneficial social policy goals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
路易斯安那州工伤赔偿法下的精神压力致精神伤害:寻求正确的社会政策平衡
路易斯安那州的工人赔偿法努力平衡雇主和雇员的利益,以造福于更大的社会。一方面,必须鼓励雇主继续经营,保护他们免受受伤员工的诉讼,以免他们破产。另一方面,必须保证雇员在工作场所受伤或生病时得到一定程度的补偿。这两种结果都是有益的社会政策目标。然而,在精神压力引起的精神伤害或没有任何身体伤害(即精神/精神伤害)的疾病的情况下,这种平衡更为微妙,部分原因是它很容易被假装。为了防止伪造的精神/精神伤害,同时假定允许真正的精神/精神伤害索赔,路易斯安那州的法律将这类索赔的赔偿标准提高得太高。对这些索赔的一项代表性调查显示,即使在真正的精神/精神伤害案件中,拒绝赔偿的比率也比恢复赔偿的比率高得不成比例,这就提出了一个问题,即在雇主和雇员的利益之间是否以支持工人赔偿计划的社会政策目标的方式取得了适当的平衡。虽然所审查的一个允许赔偿的案例中有第三方因素,但这不太可能开启一种为真正的精神/精神伤害索赔提供更多赔偿的趋势。因此,路易斯安那州立法机构应该根据本文建议的思路重新审视标准,以便根据有益的社会政策目标建立适当的平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Intergenerational Effects of Requiring Unemployment Benefit Recipients to Engage in Non-Search Activities Supplemental Security Income and Children Universal Basic Income: A Review Financing for Health Coverage in India: Issues and Concerns Social Program Substitution and Optimal Policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1