‘We Can Only Request What's in Our Protocol’: Technology and Work Autonomy in Healthcare

Dimitra I. Petrakaki, Andreas Kornelakis
{"title":"‘We Can Only Request What's in Our Protocol’: Technology and Work Autonomy in Healthcare","authors":"Dimitra I. Petrakaki, Andreas Kornelakis","doi":"10.1111/ntwe.12072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the tension between standardization and autonomy raised by the implementation of new technology in healthcare organisations. The theoretical frame of this study is grounded in the impact of new technologies on work organisation, routinization and autonomy across settings. Empirically it presents evidence from two NHS Trusts in England that implemented a national Electronic Patient Record (EPR). The paper aims to reinvigorate the debate on the tension between standardization and autonomy in professional workplaces such as healthcare. It argues that the implication of technology in professional work conditions processes of task routinization that constrain autonomy, and enables reallocation of discretion between professional groups. We argue that routinization is not restricted to low-skill work but may travel across contexts and be evidenced in high-skill work environments. The interplay between routinization and autonomy is also useful in drawing insights concerning the dynamics of change that occur in professional work.","PeriodicalId":212698,"journal":{"name":"Change Management & Organizational Behavior eJournal","volume":"17 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Change Management & Organizational Behavior eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

This paper explores the tension between standardization and autonomy raised by the implementation of new technology in healthcare organisations. The theoretical frame of this study is grounded in the impact of new technologies on work organisation, routinization and autonomy across settings. Empirically it presents evidence from two NHS Trusts in England that implemented a national Electronic Patient Record (EPR). The paper aims to reinvigorate the debate on the tension between standardization and autonomy in professional workplaces such as healthcare. It argues that the implication of technology in professional work conditions processes of task routinization that constrain autonomy, and enables reallocation of discretion between professional groups. We argue that routinization is not restricted to low-skill work but may travel across contexts and be evidenced in high-skill work environments. The interplay between routinization and autonomy is also useful in drawing insights concerning the dynamics of change that occur in professional work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“我们只能要求我们协议中的内容”:医疗保健中的技术和工作自主权
本文探讨了在医疗保健组织实施新技术所引起的标准化和自治之间的紧张关系。本研究的理论框架基于新技术对工作组织、常规化和自主性的影响。从经验上讲,它提出了英格兰两个NHS信托基金实施国家电子病历(EPR)的证据。这篇论文旨在重振关于专业工作场所(如医疗保健)标准化和自治之间紧张关系的辩论。它认为,技术在专业工作条件中的含义是任务常规化过程,限制了自主性,并使自由裁量权在专业群体之间重新分配。我们认为,常规化并不局限于低技能的工作,而是可能跨越上下文,并在高技能的工作环境中得到证明。常规化和自主性之间的相互作用也有助于深入了解专业工作中发生的变化动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Creativity and Corporate Culture Debiasing as a Powerful Management Accounting Tool? Evidence from German Firms The Analysis of Relationship Among Transformational Leadership Style and Performance of Personnel by Mediation Role of Organizational Culture Autonomy at Work in the Gig Economy: Analysing Work Status, Work Content and Working Conditions of Independent Professionals An Evidence-Based Model for Agile Organizational Change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1