Exploring the Privacy Bound for Differential Privacy: From Theory to Practice

Xianmang He, Yuan Hong, Yindong Chen
{"title":"Exploring the Privacy Bound for Differential Privacy: From Theory to Practice","authors":"Xianmang He, Yuan Hong, Yindong Chen","doi":"10.4108/eai.8-4-2019.157414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data privacy has attracted significant interests in both database theory and security communities in the past few decades. Differential privacy has emerged as a new paradigm for rigorous privacy protection regardless of adversaries prior knowledge. However, the meaning of privacy bound and how to select an appropriate may still be unclear to the general data owners. More recently, some approaches have been proposed to derive the upper bounds of for specified privacy risks. Unfortunately, these upper bounds suffer from some deficiencies (e.g., the bound relies on the data size, or might be too large), which greatly limits their applicability. To remedy this problem, we propose a novel approach that converts the privacy bound in differential privacy to privacy risks understandable to generic users, and present an in-depth theoretical analysis for it. Finally, we have conducted experiments to demonstrate the effectiveness of our model. Received on 19 December 2018; accepted on 21 January 2019; published on 25 January 2019","PeriodicalId":335727,"journal":{"name":"EAI Endorsed Trans. Security Safety","volume":"31 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EAI Endorsed Trans. Security Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.8-4-2019.157414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Data privacy has attracted significant interests in both database theory and security communities in the past few decades. Differential privacy has emerged as a new paradigm for rigorous privacy protection regardless of adversaries prior knowledge. However, the meaning of privacy bound and how to select an appropriate may still be unclear to the general data owners. More recently, some approaches have been proposed to derive the upper bounds of for specified privacy risks. Unfortunately, these upper bounds suffer from some deficiencies (e.g., the bound relies on the data size, or might be too large), which greatly limits their applicability. To remedy this problem, we propose a novel approach that converts the privacy bound in differential privacy to privacy risks understandable to generic users, and present an in-depth theoretical analysis for it. Finally, we have conducted experiments to demonstrate the effectiveness of our model. Received on 19 December 2018; accepted on 21 January 2019; published on 25 January 2019
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
差分隐私的隐私边界探索:从理论到实践
在过去的几十年里,数据隐私已经引起了数据库理论和安全社区的极大兴趣。差分隐私已经成为一种新的范式,无论对手是否事先知道,都可以进行严格的隐私保护。但是,一般数据所有者可能仍然不清楚隐私约束的含义以及如何选择合适的隐私约束。最近,人们提出了一些方法来推导特定隐私风险的上界。不幸的是,这些上限存在一些缺陷(例如,上限依赖于数据大小,或者可能太大),这极大地限制了它们的适用性。为了解决这一问题,我们提出了一种新的方法,将差分隐私中的隐私界限转化为一般用户可以理解的隐私风险,并对其进行了深入的理论分析。最后,通过实验验证了模型的有效性。2018年12月19日收到;2019年1月21日接受;发布于2019年1月25日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Systemic Security and Privacy Review: Attacks and Prevention Mechanisms over IOT Layers Mitigating Vulnerabilities in Closed Source Software Comparing Online Surveys for Cybersecurity: SONA and MTurk Dynamic Risk Assessment and Analysis Framework for Large-Scale Cyber-Physical Systems How data-sharing nudges influence people's privacy preferences: A machine learning-based analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1