A Comparison of Urban, Suburban, and Rural Principal Leadership

S. Erwin, Pam Winn, J. Erwin
{"title":"A Comparison of Urban, Suburban, and Rural Principal Leadership","authors":"S. Erwin, Pam Winn, J. Erwin","doi":"10.5929/2011.1.2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Because of the importance of developing highly skilled school leaders, statewide assessments of 784 Texas public school administrators were compared in a causal-comparison study to determine how leadership skills varied by type of campus (urban, suburban and rural) and by campus student achievement ratings. Data were collected from a 2006-2008 Texas state-approved principal performance assessment, Principal Assessment of Student Success (PASS). Principal leadership skills identified in PASS were compared within campus student achievement categories as measured by Texas (No Child Left Behind) public school accountability ratings, and data were disaggregated by campus type (urban, suburban, rural). Important findings indicate that leadership skills of urban, suburban, and rural principals at campuses with the state’s highest student academic achievement ratings differ from skills of principals at schools with lower student academic achievement ratings. Study findings indicate that principals from all campus achievement levels demonstrate functional domain (managerial) skills; however, as principals increasingly demonstrate programming domain (systemic) skills, campus student achievement increases. This finding suggests the need for professional development aimed at nurturing systemic practices among campus leaders. In addition, clear communication, both individually (i.e. Oral Expression) and within groups (i.e. Staff Development) appears to differentiate leaders at more highly rated campuses, indicating a need to develop these skills to a greater extent.\n\nKeywords: school leadership, academic achievement, urban schools, suburban schools, rural schools","PeriodicalId":189332,"journal":{"name":"Administrative Issues Journal","volume":"28 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administrative Issues Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5929/2011.1.2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Because of the importance of developing highly skilled school leaders, statewide assessments of 784 Texas public school administrators were compared in a causal-comparison study to determine how leadership skills varied by type of campus (urban, suburban and rural) and by campus student achievement ratings. Data were collected from a 2006-2008 Texas state-approved principal performance assessment, Principal Assessment of Student Success (PASS). Principal leadership skills identified in PASS were compared within campus student achievement categories as measured by Texas (No Child Left Behind) public school accountability ratings, and data were disaggregated by campus type (urban, suburban, rural). Important findings indicate that leadership skills of urban, suburban, and rural principals at campuses with the state’s highest student academic achievement ratings differ from skills of principals at schools with lower student academic achievement ratings. Study findings indicate that principals from all campus achievement levels demonstrate functional domain (managerial) skills; however, as principals increasingly demonstrate programming domain (systemic) skills, campus student achievement increases. This finding suggests the need for professional development aimed at nurturing systemic practices among campus leaders. In addition, clear communication, both individually (i.e. Oral Expression) and within groups (i.e. Staff Development) appears to differentiate leaders at more highly rated campuses, indicating a need to develop these skills to a greater extent. Keywords: school leadership, academic achievement, urban schools, suburban schools, rural schools
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
城市、郊区和农村校长领导的比较
由于培养高技能学校领导的重要性,在一项因果比较研究中,对784名德克萨斯州公立学校管理人员的全州评估进行了比较,以确定领导技能如何因校园类型(城市、郊区和农村)和校园学生成绩评级而变化。数据收集自2006-2008年德克萨斯州批准的校长绩效评估,学生成功校长评估(PASS)。在PASS中确定的主要领导技能在校园学生成就类别中进行了比较,这是由德克萨斯州(不让一个孩子掉队)公立学校责任评级衡量的,数据按校园类型(城市,郊区,农村)分类。重要的研究结果表明,在学生学业成绩最高的校园里,城市、郊区和农村校长的领导技能与学生学业成绩较低的学校校长的领导技能不同。研究结果显示,来自不同校园成就水平的校长表现出职能领域(管理)技能;然而,随着校长越来越多地展示编程领域(系统)技能,校园学生的成绩也在提高。这一发现表明,需要专业发展,旨在培养校园领导者的系统实践。此外,清晰的沟通,无论是个人(即口头表达)还是团体内部(即员工发展),似乎都能在更高评级的校园中区分领导者,这表明需要在更大程度上发展这些技能。关键词:学校领导,学习成绩,城市学校,郊区学校,农村学校
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
When Culture and Change Collide In Higher Education: A Case Study at One University Authentic Engagement through Workplace Pedagogy MASTERING CRITICAL THINKING COMPETENCIES IN ONLINE GRADUATE CLASSES Gender Difference in STEM Career Aspiration and Social-Cognitive Factors in Collectivist and Individualist Cultures PROTECT STUDENTS’ EDUCATIONAL FUTURES THROUGH SOCIAL CAPITAL OPPORTUNITIES IN SPORT AND NON - SPORT EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1