Application of Psychological Nursing Intervention to Patients with Leukemia Chemotherapy

K. Song, Hong Xiao
{"title":"Application of Psychological Nursing Intervention to Patients with Leukemia Chemotherapy","authors":"K. Song, Hong Xiao","doi":"10.11648/J.AJNS.20211001.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In leukemia chemotherapy, leukemia is considered one of the most important diseases in medical field. Also, nursing intervention has been shown to be one of key factors as it can improve the mood of depression and anxiety of patients. Objective: To assess application of psychological nursing intervention to patients with leukemia chemotherapy. Methods: This study is a horizontal comparative, that we assess the application of psychological nursing intervention to patients with leukemia chemotherapy by comparison of mental status of patients and their satisfaction. we collected valid data from 138 patients with leukemia chemotherapy. We randomly assigned patients to two groups: the control group received conventional nursing intervention, and the intervention group received psychological nursing intervention on the basis of conventional nursing intervention. Besides, the data were collected from medical records of patient and some questionnaire, the questionnaire contrasted Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-rating depression scale (SDS) and satisfaction assessment questionnaire. Result: In patient characteristics, there were no significant differences in age, gender and course factors between the two groups [38.69±15.21 vs 40.90±11.87, 26 (66.7%) vs 37 (94.9%), 5.25±5.01 vs 6.05±5.26, p > 0.05]. Additionally, the intervention group had lower assessments of SDS and SAS compare with control group, it means that intervention group had better mental health after carrying out nursing intervention (41.5±8.82 vs 53.4±10.44, 49.65+9.45 vs 40.25+5.11). base on satisfaction assessment, intervention group had 97.1% of satisfaction rate, it was significant differences for satisfaction rate of control group (97.1% vs 85.5%, p < 0.05). Conclusion: psychological nursing intervention had better effect in improvement of mental health in treatment of the patients with leukemia chemotherapy.","PeriodicalId":344042,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Nursing Science","volume":"12 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Nursing Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.AJNS.20211001.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In leukemia chemotherapy, leukemia is considered one of the most important diseases in medical field. Also, nursing intervention has been shown to be one of key factors as it can improve the mood of depression and anxiety of patients. Objective: To assess application of psychological nursing intervention to patients with leukemia chemotherapy. Methods: This study is a horizontal comparative, that we assess the application of psychological nursing intervention to patients with leukemia chemotherapy by comparison of mental status of patients and their satisfaction. we collected valid data from 138 patients with leukemia chemotherapy. We randomly assigned patients to two groups: the control group received conventional nursing intervention, and the intervention group received psychological nursing intervention on the basis of conventional nursing intervention. Besides, the data were collected from medical records of patient and some questionnaire, the questionnaire contrasted Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-rating depression scale (SDS) and satisfaction assessment questionnaire. Result: In patient characteristics, there were no significant differences in age, gender and course factors between the two groups [38.69±15.21 vs 40.90±11.87, 26 (66.7%) vs 37 (94.9%), 5.25±5.01 vs 6.05±5.26, p > 0.05]. Additionally, the intervention group had lower assessments of SDS and SAS compare with control group, it means that intervention group had better mental health after carrying out nursing intervention (41.5±8.82 vs 53.4±10.44, 49.65+9.45 vs 40.25+5.11). base on satisfaction assessment, intervention group had 97.1% of satisfaction rate, it was significant differences for satisfaction rate of control group (97.1% vs 85.5%, p < 0.05). Conclusion: psychological nursing intervention had better effect in improvement of mental health in treatment of the patients with leukemia chemotherapy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心理护理干预在白血病化疗患者中的应用
背景:在白血病化疗中,白血病被认为是医学领域最重要的疾病之一。此外,护理干预已被证明是关键因素之一,因为它可以改善患者的抑郁和焦虑情绪。目的:探讨心理护理干预在白血病化疗患者中的应用。方法:本研究采用横向比较的方法,通过对白血病化疗患者心理状态及满意度的比较,评价心理护理干预在白血病化疗患者中的应用。我们收集了138例白血病化疗患者的有效数据。我们将患者随机分为两组:对照组进行常规护理干预,干预组在常规护理干预的基础上进行心理护理干预。此外,收集患者病历资料和部分问卷,对焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)和满意度评估问卷进行对比。结果:在患者特征方面,两组患者年龄、性别、病程因素差异无统计学意义[38.69±15.21 vs 40.90±11.87,26 (66.7%)vs 37(94.9%), 5.25±5.01 vs 6.05±5.26,p > 0.05]。干预组SDS、SAS评分低于对照组(41.5±8.82比53.4±10.44,49.65+9.45比40.25+5.11),说明干预组实施护理干预后心理健康状况较好。在满意度评估中,干预组满意度为97.1%,对照组满意度为85.5%,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:心理护理干预对改善白血病化疗患者的心理健康有较好的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Challenges Experienced by Caregivers in Communicating with Children with Severe to Profound Intellectual Disabilities New Graduate Nurses Transition: Role of Lack of Experience and Knowledge as Challenging Factors Influence of Stress on Drug Abuse Among Prison Inmates: A Case of Kangeta Prison, Meru County, Kenya Influence of Stress on Drug Abuse Among Prison Inmates: A Case of Kangeta Prison, Meru County, Kenya Construction of Risk Prediction Model for Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis in Patients with Decompensated Cirrhosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1