Self-Knowledge: Based on Knowledge of the First Cause of Creation (Aristotle’s Conception of the Soul)

Leon Miller Tallinn
{"title":"Self-Knowledge: Based on Knowledge of the First Cause of Creation (Aristotle’s Conception of the Soul)","authors":"Leon Miller Tallinn","doi":"10.12726/tjp.21.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article argues that Aristotle depicts the soul as a detectable aspect of one’s being, is in the form of properties, and is discernable by cognition. Thus, he proposed that it is possible to discern the complementary connection between one’s being and the first cause of creation. Aristotle, like Kant, recognised that the age-old problem of scepticism posed a challenge to epistemological, ontological, and ethical claims. However, Kant did not develop his ideas regarding bridging the gap between what is demonstrable and the first cause of creation – which resulted in perpetuating problems with scepticism and dualism. Consequently, in the effort to resolve the problems of scepticism and dualism, to promote self-actualisation, holistic well-being and, to help individuals realise their full potential there is a resurgence of Aristotle’s explanation of the relationship between self-knowledge and knowledge of the first cause of creation. \nThis article contributes to the philosophy of science, the philosophy of the social sciences, the philosophy of religion, to contemporary literature on social psychology, and to literature addressing the interface between the sciences and perennial philosophy by demonstrating that Aristotle’s perennial wisdom and his epistemic approach – based on logical positivism – resolve problems related to scepticism, materialism, and dualism.","PeriodicalId":279219,"journal":{"name":"Tattva - Journal of Philosophy","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tattva - Journal of Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12726/tjp.21.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article argues that Aristotle depicts the soul as a detectable aspect of one’s being, is in the form of properties, and is discernable by cognition. Thus, he proposed that it is possible to discern the complementary connection between one’s being and the first cause of creation. Aristotle, like Kant, recognised that the age-old problem of scepticism posed a challenge to epistemological, ontological, and ethical claims. However, Kant did not develop his ideas regarding bridging the gap between what is demonstrable and the first cause of creation – which resulted in perpetuating problems with scepticism and dualism. Consequently, in the effort to resolve the problems of scepticism and dualism, to promote self-actualisation, holistic well-being and, to help individuals realise their full potential there is a resurgence of Aristotle’s explanation of the relationship between self-knowledge and knowledge of the first cause of creation. This article contributes to the philosophy of science, the philosophy of the social sciences, the philosophy of religion, to contemporary literature on social psychology, and to literature addressing the interface between the sciences and perennial philosophy by demonstrating that Aristotle’s perennial wisdom and his epistemic approach – based on logical positivism – resolve problems related to scepticism, materialism, and dualism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自我认识:基于对创世第一因的认识(亚里士多德的灵魂观)
本文认为,亚里士多德将灵魂描述为一个人存在的可检测方面,以属性的形式存在,并且可以通过认知来识别。因此,他提出,有可能辨别出一个人的存在与创造的第一个原因之间的互补联系。亚里士多德和康德一样,认识到怀疑主义这个古老的问题对认识论、本体论和伦理主张构成了挑战。然而,康德并没有发展他的关于弥合可证明的和创造的第一原因之间的差距的想法——这导致了怀疑主义和二元论的长期问题。因此,在努力解决怀疑主义和二元论的问题,促进自我实现,整体福祉,并帮助个人实现其全部潜力的过程中,亚里士多德对自我认识与创造的第一原因之间关系的解释再次出现。这篇文章对科学哲学、社会科学哲学、宗教哲学、当代社会心理学文学,以及解决科学和永恒哲学之间的接口的文学做出了贡献,通过展示亚里士多德的永恒智慧和他的基于逻辑实证主义的认识论方法,解决了与怀疑主义、唯物主义和二元论有关的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hard, Harder, and the Hardest Problem: The Society of Cognitive Selves Fundamentality and Conditionality of Existence Monism and Pluralism – A Conceptual Analysis of Their Mutual Interactions within Discourses on Religion Critiquing Critique Knowledge and Action in Non-Dualistic Vedānta: The Incongruity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1