Difficult but Valuable! Learning in Student-centered Assessment Feedback Practices in Higher Education

Maunumäki Minna, Maunula Minna, Harjunpaa Heidi
{"title":"Difficult but Valuable! Learning in Student-centered Assessment Feedback Practices in Higher Education","authors":"Maunumäki Minna, Maunula Minna, Harjunpaa Heidi","doi":"10.9734/jesbs/2022/v35i1130467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: The aim of this study is to fill a gap in research on students' experiences of learning in student-centered assessment feedback practices. The article examines what students tell us about their learning in the context of student-centered feedback practices in higher education during online learning. \nStudy Design: The study was conducted as a qualitative online survey among Finnish university students (N=35). The relationship between learning and assessment was explored in the context of formative and summative assessment practices during an online learning environment. The data was analysed using a discursive approach. \nPlace and Duration of Study: The research was conducted in Finland during spring 2021. \nMethodology: The scientific and philosophical framework of the study is based on the theory of social constructionism, according to which social reality is formed through language in an interaction between people. The methodology used was discursive reading, i.e., how social reality is discursively produced through language. The starting point was the idea that language creates different discourses or perspectives on reality. \nResults: The feedback practices provided a different picture of learning and highlighted different dimensions of learning. Learning was discussed in terms of positive emotions, multiple perspectives, sociality, renewal, and holistic learning. In addition, negative emotions, disinformation, regression, and the playing field metaphor were associated with learning.  \nConclusion: The results show that feedback practices that are presented as student-centered do not necessarily support the learning process of adults. Learning and assessment practices based on pedagogy and a learning theory can best support students' personal and social growth and increase their self-esteem. In online learning, teacher guidance and pedagogically based learning support are emphasized. We argue that in online-learning, where the role of the teacher is often small, student-centered well-intentioned assessment practices can only provide a thin veneer of learning unless students are helped to see the holistic importance of assessment as part of the learning process.","PeriodicalId":394178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/jesbs/2022/v35i1130467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study is to fill a gap in research on students' experiences of learning in student-centered assessment feedback practices. The article examines what students tell us about their learning in the context of student-centered feedback practices in higher education during online learning. Study Design: The study was conducted as a qualitative online survey among Finnish university students (N=35). The relationship between learning and assessment was explored in the context of formative and summative assessment practices during an online learning environment. The data was analysed using a discursive approach. Place and Duration of Study: The research was conducted in Finland during spring 2021. Methodology: The scientific and philosophical framework of the study is based on the theory of social constructionism, according to which social reality is formed through language in an interaction between people. The methodology used was discursive reading, i.e., how social reality is discursively produced through language. The starting point was the idea that language creates different discourses or perspectives on reality. Results: The feedback practices provided a different picture of learning and highlighted different dimensions of learning. Learning was discussed in terms of positive emotions, multiple perspectives, sociality, renewal, and holistic learning. In addition, negative emotions, disinformation, regression, and the playing field metaphor were associated with learning.  Conclusion: The results show that feedback practices that are presented as student-centered do not necessarily support the learning process of adults. Learning and assessment practices based on pedagogy and a learning theory can best support students' personal and social growth and increase their self-esteem. In online learning, teacher guidance and pedagogically based learning support are emphasized. We argue that in online-learning, where the role of the teacher is often small, student-centered well-intentioned assessment practices can only provide a thin veneer of learning unless students are helped to see the holistic importance of assessment as part of the learning process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
困难但有价值!高等教育中以学生为中心的评价反馈实践中的学习
目的:本研究旨在填补以学生为中心的评价反馈实践中关于学生学习体验研究的空白。本文考察了在高等教育在线学习中以学生为中心的反馈实践背景下,学生告诉我们他们的学习情况。研究设计:本研究对芬兰大学生(N=35)进行定性在线调查。在在线学习环境中的形成性和总结性评估实践的背景下,探讨了学习与评估之间的关系。数据是用论述法分析的。研究地点和时间:研究于2021年春季在芬兰进行。方法论:本研究的科学和哲学框架是建立在社会建构主义理论的基础上的,根据社会建构主义理论,社会现实是在人们之间的互动中通过语言形成的。使用的方法是话语阅读,即社会现实是如何通过语言话语产生的。出发点是语言创造了不同的话语或对现实的看法。结果:反馈实践提供了一幅不同的学习图景,突出了学习的不同维度。学习从积极情绪、多元视角、社会性、更新性和整体学习四个方面进行了探讨。此外,负面情绪、虚假信息、倒退和运动场隐喻与学习有关。结论:结果表明,以学生为中心的反馈实践不一定支持成人的学习过程。基于教育学和学习理论的学习和评估实践可以最好地支持学生的个人和社会成长,并提高他们的自尊。在在线学习中,强调教师指导和基于教学的学习支持。我们认为,在在线学习中,教师的作用往往很小,以学生为中心的善意评估实践只能提供一层薄薄的学习表面,除非帮助学生看到评估作为学习过程一部分的整体重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Determinants of Values of Integrity in Bhutanese Youth: An Empirical Study Corruption Risks in Differential Taxation on Goods: Insights from Bhutan Trade Statistics and Case Examples Exploring Primary School Pupils’ Career Aspirations in Ibadan, Nigeria: A Qualitative Approach Investigation of the Status of Music Teaching in Middle School under the Background of "Art into the Middle School Entrance Examination" in Dejiang County, China Promoting Intentional Vocabulary Learning among EFL Learners in Saudi Arabia: The Role of Captioned and Subtitled TV Series
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1