Evaluation of left atrial two-dimensional strain in patients with systolic heart failure using velocity vector imaging

M. Esmaeilzadeh., F. Vakilian, M. Maleki, A. Amin, S. Taghavi, H. Bakhshandeh
{"title":"Evaluation of left atrial two-dimensional strain in patients with systolic heart failure using velocity vector imaging","authors":"M. Esmaeilzadeh., F. Vakilian, M. Maleki, A. Amin, S. Taghavi, H. Bakhshandeh","doi":"10.5812/acvi.14486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Two-dimensional (2D) Strain is a new reproducible technique for assessing regional myocardial function; however, its application for evaluation of left atrium (LA) function is less studied. Objectives: We sought to assess LA function in heart failure patients using velocity vector imaging (VVI). Patients and Methods: Thirty five patients (mean age: 43.34 ± 18.1 years, 59.3% male) with systolic dysfunction [left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) < 35%] enrolled. Standard Doppler echocardiography and 2D strain were performed on all subjects. Strain measurements were obtained from apical views. Results: A significant differences in LA volume index (LAVI) and strain were found in patients with systolic heart failure (SHF) versus normal subjects (23.8 ± 4.1 versus 57.8 ± 19.7 ml/m2, P < 0.001 and 39.6 ± 10.6 versus 8.2 ± 5.3%, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis of separate walls revealed significant inverse relationship between LA size and volume with total and regional (2-ch view) 2D strains of LA. Significant inverse relationship were also detected between pulmonary artery systolic pressure and both total LA strain (22 ± 8 versus 42 ± 10 mmHg, r = -0.4, P < 0.001) and LA strain in 2-chamber (r = -0.5, P < 0.001). A cutoff value of total average LA strain (≥ 23.28%) can differentiate normal and abnormal LA function with a sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 100% and a cutoff value of total LA strain (in average) of 17.2% can differentiate mild and moderate and severe diastolic dysfunction with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 97%. Conclusions: LA strain seems to be a better determinant for diagnosis of abnormal LA function and the degree of diastolic dysfunction in SHF.","PeriodicalId":429543,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Cardiovascular Imaging","volume":"67 8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Cardiovascular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/acvi.14486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Two-dimensional (2D) Strain is a new reproducible technique for assessing regional myocardial function; however, its application for evaluation of left atrium (LA) function is less studied. Objectives: We sought to assess LA function in heart failure patients using velocity vector imaging (VVI). Patients and Methods: Thirty five patients (mean age: 43.34 ± 18.1 years, 59.3% male) with systolic dysfunction [left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) < 35%] enrolled. Standard Doppler echocardiography and 2D strain were performed on all subjects. Strain measurements were obtained from apical views. Results: A significant differences in LA volume index (LAVI) and strain were found in patients with systolic heart failure (SHF) versus normal subjects (23.8 ± 4.1 versus 57.8 ± 19.7 ml/m2, P < 0.001 and 39.6 ± 10.6 versus 8.2 ± 5.3%, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis of separate walls revealed significant inverse relationship between LA size and volume with total and regional (2-ch view) 2D strains of LA. Significant inverse relationship were also detected between pulmonary artery systolic pressure and both total LA strain (22 ± 8 versus 42 ± 10 mmHg, r = -0.4, P < 0.001) and LA strain in 2-chamber (r = -0.5, P < 0.001). A cutoff value of total average LA strain (≥ 23.28%) can differentiate normal and abnormal LA function with a sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 100% and a cutoff value of total LA strain (in average) of 17.2% can differentiate mild and moderate and severe diastolic dysfunction with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 97%. Conclusions: LA strain seems to be a better determinant for diagnosis of abnormal LA function and the degree of diastolic dysfunction in SHF.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
速度矢量成像评价收缩期心力衰竭患者左心房二维应变
背景:二维应变是评估局部心肌功能的一种可重复的新技术;但其在左心房功能评价中的应用研究较少。目的:利用速度矢量成像(velocity vector imaging, VVI)评估心力衰竭患者的LA功能。患者和方法:纳入35例(平均年龄:43.34±18.1岁,男性59.3%)伴有收缩功能障碍[左心室射血分数(LVEF) < 35%]的患者。所有受试者均行标准多普勒超声心动图和二维应变。应变测量是从顶点视图获得的。结果:收缩期心力衰竭(SHF)患者的LA容积指数(LAVI)和应变与正常人相比有显著差异(23.8±4.1 vs 57.8±19.7 ml/m2, P < 0.001; 39.6±10.6 vs 8.2±5.3%,P < 0.001)。多因素分析显示,LA的大小和体积与LA的总菌株和区域(2-ch视图)2D菌株呈显著负相关。肺动脉收缩压与总LA应变(22±8 vs 42±10 mmHg, r = -0.4, P < 0.001)和2室LA应变(r = -0.5, P < 0.001)均呈显著负相关。总平均LA菌株的临界值(≥23.28%)区分正常与异常LA功能的灵敏度为93%,特异性为100%;总平均LA菌株的临界值(平均17.2%)区分轻、中、重度舒张功能不全的灵敏度为100%,特异性为97%。结论:LA菌株可能是诊断SHF患者LA功能异常和舒张功能不全程度的较好决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Noninvasive Assessment of Coronary Flow Reserve Before and After Ranolazine Administration: Does It Improve in Our Real Patients? Postpartum Inverted Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy After Intravenous Atropine Administration Heart Failure in a Case of Inverted Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy due to Cocaine and Methamphetamine Abuse Treated with Levosimendan Strain Echocardiography Immediately Before Acute Left Ventricular Rupture Following Anterior Wall Myocardial Infarction Isolated congenital left ventricular diverticula: A rare cardiac anomaly
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1