Work in progress: A case study of the types and frequencies of conflict in engineering design dyads

J. Mondisa, N. Fila, E. Dringenberg, Tasha Zephirin, Ş. Purzer
{"title":"Work in progress: A case study of the types and frequencies of conflict in engineering design dyads","authors":"J. Mondisa, N. Fila, E. Dringenberg, Tasha Zephirin, Ş. Purzer","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2012.6462510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conflict is a common subject of research on engineering teams. While some conflict may improve team creativity and productivity, it can also detract from team member satisfaction, perceived team efficacy, and overall team performance. In this paper, we present a preliminary framework for identifying conflict within engineering design dyads using a case study approach. Using this framework, we identified instances of conflict in one male-male and one female-male engineering dyad performing a brief engineering design task. We identified more instances of conflict in the male-male dyad than the female-male dyad; however, this conflict appeared to be productive. An implication of this research for educators is to encourage argumentation within the teamwork occurring in their classroom. Students should understand that conflict can be constructive and improve their team's ability to move iteratively through the design process.","PeriodicalId":120268,"journal":{"name":"2012 Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2012.6462510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Conflict is a common subject of research on engineering teams. While some conflict may improve team creativity and productivity, it can also detract from team member satisfaction, perceived team efficacy, and overall team performance. In this paper, we present a preliminary framework for identifying conflict within engineering design dyads using a case study approach. Using this framework, we identified instances of conflict in one male-male and one female-male engineering dyad performing a brief engineering design task. We identified more instances of conflict in the male-male dyad than the female-male dyad; however, this conflict appeared to be productive. An implication of this research for educators is to encourage argumentation within the teamwork occurring in their classroom. Students should understand that conflict can be constructive and improve their team's ability to move iteratively through the design process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正在进行的工作:工程设计对偶中冲突的类型和频率的案例研究
冲突是工程团队研究的一个常见主题。虽然一些冲突可能会提高团队的创造力和生产力,但它也会降低团队成员的满意度、团队效能感和整体团队绩效。在本文中,我们提出了一个初步的框架,以确定冲突工程设计双使用案例研究的方法。利用这一框架,我们确定了一名男性工程师和一名女性工程师在执行一项简短的工程设计任务时发生冲突的实例。我们发现雄性和雄性的冲突比雌性和雄性的冲突更多;然而,这种冲突似乎是有成效的。这项研究对教育工作者的一个启示是鼓励他们在课堂上进行团队合作。学生们应该明白,冲突可以是建设性的,可以提高他们的团队在设计过程中迭代的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Undergraduate hands-on senior capstone project experience on emerging mobile IPV6 technology A program to increase female engineering and science enrollments through NSF STEM scholarships Care ethics in engineering education: Undergraduate student perceptions of responsibility Work in progress: Out-of-class learning: Shaping perception of learning and building knowledge of IT professions Differentiating undergraduates from graduate student and faculty inventors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1