Designing Optimal Macroeconomic Policy Rules Under Parameter Uncertainty: A Stochastic Dominance Approach

Mariusz Górajski, Zbigniew Kuchta
{"title":"Designing Optimal Macroeconomic Policy Rules Under Parameter Uncertainty: A Stochastic Dominance Approach","authors":"Mariusz Górajski, Zbigniew Kuchta","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3915515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper offers a Bayesian decision-theoretic approach to policy evaluation in rational expectation models. First, we show how to correctly assess and rank simple policy rules under the welfare loss minimization criterion in the presence of uncertainty about the model’s structural parameters. We consider a Bayesian policymaker who assesses the effectiveness of policy actions by comparing the distributions of welfare losses using stochastic dominance orderings. Second, we propose a new Bayesian testing procedure for verifying the k-degree stochastic dominance relation. Third, we apply our approach to a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model, estimated for the U.S. economy. We show that using stochastic dominance to rank simple policy rules yields different rankings than using well-established robust approaches. The contemporaneous monetary policy rule that reacts to inflation and the output gap, with an interest rate smoothing mechanism, minimises the welfare loss for all decision-makers who admit infinite degree stochastic dominance preferences.","PeriodicalId":378721,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Other Comparative Capitalism (Topic)","volume":"57 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Other Comparative Capitalism (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3915515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper offers a Bayesian decision-theoretic approach to policy evaluation in rational expectation models. First, we show how to correctly assess and rank simple policy rules under the welfare loss minimization criterion in the presence of uncertainty about the model’s structural parameters. We consider a Bayesian policymaker who assesses the effectiveness of policy actions by comparing the distributions of welfare losses using stochastic dominance orderings. Second, we propose a new Bayesian testing procedure for verifying the k-degree stochastic dominance relation. Third, we apply our approach to a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model, estimated for the U.S. economy. We show that using stochastic dominance to rank simple policy rules yields different rankings than using well-established robust approaches. The contemporaneous monetary policy rule that reacts to inflation and the output gap, with an interest rate smoothing mechanism, minimises the welfare loss for all decision-makers who admit infinite degree stochastic dominance preferences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
参数不确定性下最优宏观经济政策规则设计:随机优势方法
本文提出了一种基于贝叶斯决策理论的理性期望模型政策评价方法。首先,我们展示了在存在模型结构参数不确定性的情况下,如何在福利损失最小化准则下正确评估和排序简单的政策规则。我们考虑一个贝叶斯政策制定者,他通过比较使用随机优势排序的福利损失分布来评估政策行动的有效性。其次,我们提出了一种新的验证k度随机优势关系的贝叶斯检验方法。第三,我们将我们的方法应用于一个动态随机一般均衡模型,估计美国经济。我们表明,使用随机优势对简单的政策规则进行排名,与使用成熟的稳健方法产生不同的排名。对通胀和产出缺口作出反应的同期货币政策规则,加上利率平滑机制,使所有承认无限度随机优势偏好的决策者的福利损失最小化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Income and Consumption over the Business Cycle: Evidence from Matched Administrative Data Unemployment Hysteresis in Asian Countries: Findings Based on Flexible Fourier Form and Structural Break Unit Root Tests How Americans Respond to Idiosyncratic and Exogenous Changes in Household Wealth and Unearned Income Do Mutual Funds Represent Individual Investors? Global or Country Business Cycles: Developed versus Developing Countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1