Wonder Nyoni, M. Pillay, Mark Rubin, Marcus Jefferies
{"title":"The relationship between organizational factors and residual risk in the mining industry – a protocol for updating a systematic review","authors":"Wonder Nyoni, M. Pillay, Mark Rubin, Marcus Jefferies","doi":"10.24840/2184-0954_003.002_0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organizational factors have long been suspected to have the greatest influence on individual and group behavior in the workplace, although there is little research on their influence in mining workplaces. In addition, there is little research on the influence of organizational factors on residual risk management in the mining industry. Consequently, a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) is needed in order to explore and understand this gap. This paper is a protocol developed using guidance from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 to update a previous systematic review on a similar topic. The SLR protocol provides information related to the three sections (Administrative Information, Introduction and Methods) suggested by the PRISMA-P 2015. Eligibility criteria is divided into inclusion and exclusion criteria, which also provides the scope of the review. The search strategy will involve identifying studies published between 1980-2018 from the following electronic databases (Scopus, Web of Science, Proquest, EMBASE, ASCE and CINAHL). Quality appraisal of studies will be achieved through a non-structured approach (for non-empirical studies) and a Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool for empirical studies. The review will be presented as a narrative synthesis due to the qualitative nature of the topic under review.","PeriodicalId":201704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Safety","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24840/2184-0954_003.002_0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Organizational factors have long been suspected to have the greatest influence on individual and group behavior in the workplace, although there is little research on their influence in mining workplaces. In addition, there is little research on the influence of organizational factors on residual risk management in the mining industry. Consequently, a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) is needed in order to explore and understand this gap. This paper is a protocol developed using guidance from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 to update a previous systematic review on a similar topic. The SLR protocol provides information related to the three sections (Administrative Information, Introduction and Methods) suggested by the PRISMA-P 2015. Eligibility criteria is divided into inclusion and exclusion criteria, which also provides the scope of the review. The search strategy will involve identifying studies published between 1980-2018 from the following electronic databases (Scopus, Web of Science, Proquest, EMBASE, ASCE and CINAHL). Quality appraisal of studies will be achieved through a non-structured approach (for non-empirical studies) and a Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool for empirical studies. The review will be presented as a narrative synthesis due to the qualitative nature of the topic under review.
长期以来,人们一直怀疑组织因素对工作场所的个人和群体行为有最大的影响,尽管对它们在采矿工作场所的影响的研究很少。此外,组织因素对采矿业剩余风险管理的影响研究较少。因此,系统文献综述(SLR)是必要的,以探索和了解这一差距。本文是根据2015年系统评价和荟萃分析方案首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)的指导制定的方案,以更新先前关于类似主题的系统评价。SLR协议提供了与PRISMA-P 2015建议的三个部分(管理信息、介绍和方法)相关的信息。资格标准分为纳入标准和排除标准,其中也规定了审查的范围。搜索策略将包括从以下电子数据库(Scopus, Web of Science, Proquest, EMBASE, ASCE和CINAHL)中确定1980-2018年间发表的研究。研究的质量评估将通过非结构化方法(用于非实证研究)和混合方法评估工具(用于实证研究)来实现。由于所审查专题的质量性质,审查将作为叙述综合提出。