Odpowiedzialność dyscyplinarna sędziów w II Rzeczypospolitej na przykładzie wybranych sądów byłego zaboru pruskiego – zagadnienia materialnoprawne

Aleksandra Wasielewicz
{"title":"Odpowiedzialność dyscyplinarna sędziów w II Rzeczypospolitej na przykładzie wybranych sądów byłego zaboru pruskiego – zagadnienia materialnoprawne","authors":"Aleksandra Wasielewicz","doi":"10.4467/20844131ks.21.045.14471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Disciplinary Responsibility over Judges in the Second Republic of Poland. Substantive Law Issues in Light of Judges’ Personal and Disciplinary Files from the Former Prussian Territories\n\nThe issue of disciplinary responsibility over judges is one of the key aspects of the functioning of the judiciary. This mechanism must remain a compromise between respecting a special status for judges based on their independence and their key role in the functioning of the state, versus the need to eliminate negative behaviors on their part. Such oversight in turn should lead to the building up of societal trust in the judiciary. The article is an attempt to present the issue of disciplinary proceedings against judges in the Second Polish Republic in the areas of the former Prussian territories.\n\nBy presenting this issue from the perspective of substantive law, this article complements research already carried out in this area, the issue of the course of procedure in disciplinary proceedings having already been presented in a separate text. In this article, the author focuses on the issues regarding judge’s disciplinary misconduct and actual disciplinary punishments. The legal provisions were compared with the practice of their application, reconstructed on the basis of preserved archival files of judges, both personal and disciplinary.","PeriodicalId":346009,"journal":{"name":"Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4467/20844131ks.21.045.14471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disciplinary Responsibility over Judges in the Second Republic of Poland. Substantive Law Issues in Light of Judges’ Personal and Disciplinary Files from the Former Prussian Territories The issue of disciplinary responsibility over judges is one of the key aspects of the functioning of the judiciary. This mechanism must remain a compromise between respecting a special status for judges based on their independence and their key role in the functioning of the state, versus the need to eliminate negative behaviors on their part. Such oversight in turn should lead to the building up of societal trust in the judiciary. The article is an attempt to present the issue of disciplinary proceedings against judges in the Second Polish Republic in the areas of the former Prussian territories. By presenting this issue from the perspective of substantive law, this article complements research already carried out in this area, the issue of the course of procedure in disciplinary proceedings having already been presented in a separate text. In this article, the author focuses on the issues regarding judge’s disciplinary misconduct and actual disciplinary punishments. The legal provisions were compared with the practice of their application, reconstructed on the basis of preserved archival files of judges, both personal and disciplinary.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
波兰第二共和国法官的纪律责任。从前普鲁士地区法官的个人和纪律档案看实体法问题法官的纪律责任问题是司法机构运作的一个关键方面。这一机制必须在尊重法官基于其独立性及其在国家运作中的关键作用的特殊地位与消除其消极行为的需要之间保持妥协。这种监督反过来应该导致建立社会对司法机构的信任。这篇文章试图提出波兰第二共和国在前普鲁士领土地区对法官进行纪律诉讼的问题。通过从实体法的角度提出这一问题,本文补充了在这一领域已经开展的研究,纪律处分程序中的程序问题已经在单独的文本中提出。本文主要对法官违纪行为和实际惩戒问题进行了探讨。将法律规定与其适用的实践进行比较,并根据保存下来的法官个人和纪律档案档案进行重建。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Polityk dwóch epok, taki, jakim (nie) był. Minister Tadeusz Matuszewicz i jego biografia O naukowych sympatiach i antypatiach Leona Pinińskiego „Dziedzictwo prawne. Spotkania naukowe”. Sprawozdanie z posiedzeń naukowych w roku akademickim 2022/2023 International Memorial Course Marko Petrak – Roman Legal Tradition and Contemporary Legal Systems (Dubrovnik, October 16–18, 2023) Przekład Aktu Związkowego Szwajcarii z 1291 r., sporządzony w 1941 r. w obozie uniwersyteckim w Grangeneuve (Fryburgu). Edycja źródłowa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1